• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Achilles Heel of Atheism

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
The Achilles Heel of Atheism is also the Achilles Heel of anyone making proclamations about the immaterial. There is no emprical proof either way.


How do you figure? The total lack of empirical evidence is the justification for the Atheist position.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
The Achilles Heel of Atheism is also the Achilles Heel of anyone making proclamations about the immaterial. There is no emprical proof either way.

Well, I'm not sure most atheists make a proclamation about the immaterial. Usually, they just say "I don't believe in that."
 
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
To say 'there is not God' is a proclamation.

That is a proclamation... however that's not what Atheism in it's broadest definition states. The vast majority of Atheists would never make that proclamation, so you are misrepresenting the Atheistic position.

They can't possibly render a verdict because the Judaeo-Christian God brought the material into existence, thus His being could not depend on the material.

What are you talking about... What material?
 
Upvote 0

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,392
✟170,432.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
That is a proclamation... however that's not what Atheism in it's broadest definition states. The vast majority of Atheists would never make that proclamation, so you are misrepresenting the Atheistic position.[quote/]

What would they say? There is no 'evidence' for the existence of God. That is really more an Agnostic position.



What are you talking about... What material?

The physical universe/multiverse, whatever you want to call it. It is all material.
 
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
What would they say? There is no 'evidence' for the existence of God. That is really more an Agnostic position.

Agnosticism and Atheism are not mutually exclusive. Agnosticism has nothing to do with belief or lack of belief in the existence of God.

There's two possible positions someone can have when it comes to belief. They either have a positive belief about something, or they lack a positive belief.

In theological terms, that's Theism and Atheism. If you have a positive belief God exists, you're a Theist. If you do not hold a positive belief (either in a state of indecision or outright rejection), you're an Atheist.

Gnosticism and Agnosticism deals with knowledge.

A Gnostic Christian would claim to know exactly what God is, and that they know he exists. Likewise a Gnostic Atheist would claim to absolutely know that God does not exist.

An Agnostic Christian would claim that God's ways are beyond comprehension and that we can't know his true nature or plan. Most Christian Churches are actually agnostic organizations, and the Catholic Church openly persecuted the Gnostics.

An Agnostic Atheist claims that we can't say for sure that God doesn't exist, but due to a lack of evidence supporting that idea, they can not justify belief in him.

The vast majority of Atheists, including likely everyone on here, and most, if not all of the "famous Atheists" (i.e. Dawkins) would fit under the Agnostic Atheist label.


The physical universe/multiverse, whatever you want to call it. It is all material.

Ok, but even if you're right that still doesn't prove your God. If he's made up of something other than matter and energy, we still have no idea what that is, and have never detected it. That means we lack evidence that would justify belief in him.
 
Upvote 0

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,392
✟170,432.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
Ok, but even if you're right that still doesn't prove your God. If he's made up of something other than matter and energy, we still have no idea what that is, and have never detected it. That means we lack evidence that would justify belief in him.

That was not my point. My point is that both camps (theist and atheist) are on the same weak ground: there is no way to prove/disprove the existence of a God because we have no way to assess things that are not matter or energy.
 
Upvote 0

ToddNotTodd

Iconoclast
Feb 17, 2004
7,787
3,884
✟274,996.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
That was not my point. My point is that both camps (theist and atheist) are on the same weak ground: there is no way to prove/disprove the existence of a God because we have no way to assess things that are not matter or energy.

As was just pointed out to you, the atheist position is not "god does not exist". It is "I do not believe in a god or gods.". A lack of evidence is why atheists are atheists in the first place.
 
Upvote 0

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟30,682.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
That was not my point. My point is that both camps (theist and atheist) are on the same weak ground: there is no way to prove/disprove the existence of a God because we have no way to assess things that are not matter or energy.
And there is no way to prove or disprove leprechauns, unicorns, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or talking snakes.

:doh:
 
Upvote 0
E

Elioenai26

Guest
Mr. Petersen,

I too, used to understand that atheism was the view of not believing in God.

However, from several gentlemen here who have given me a better and deeper understanding of what atheism is today, the position ecompasses a wide ranging and eclectic mixture of ideas, thoughts, beliefs and views.

Most will confirm that atheism is "the lack of belief in gods or God". Now you can better understand the vast amounts of interpretations that may fall under the umbrella of this definition.

The position itself makes no positive assertions as to the existence or non-existence of God. Now assuredly there are some atheists that categorically deny the existence of God. However, I do not think that most atheists here maintain that position though.

I beleive that a good many here simply reserve the right to maintain that they lack a belief in gods or God, and if I may not be presumptuous, I may even say that they do so because they believe that there is no good evidence to believe. This is the position that I believe Belk, and Gadarene hold to, who are two gentlemen I have spoken with at length about this topic.

So if you understand this definition Mr. Petersen, you will be better able to refute it or critique it if you so desire. :idea:

If I am mistaken in what I have said, I hope someone will help me to understand better my error.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dave Ellis
Upvote 0
E

Elioenai26

Guest
'Whoever exalts himself will be humbled and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.' Matthew 23:12



I extend my arms to you as an offer of a sincere hug, that there is peace between us my brother. :hug:

Before he left this life, Samuel had made for me a custom pendant shaped like a stone tablet. And upon that was engraved the simple scriptural chapter reference: Galatians 5.

I wear that to this day, and feel it's presence now as I read your sincere remarks here. It keeps me grounded in my bond with many things. And it brings me back to center when I feel I've veered off course.
It is with sincere and humble heart that I accept your words and offer my own apologies if my remarks regarding the content of your post, and the Wikipedia entry, came across as harsh or as an attack against you personally.
I find in reading myself again in that particular post, that to my own ears at the end especially, I sounded self righteous and perhaps bitter. Perhaps I'm projecting my emotions where they have no place at certain times when I invest my attentions to this particular topic, which I hold to heart having loved dearly an Atheist once upon a time and even still.

Perhaps, if I may be so bold, I can share this passage with you brother. And perhaps it will help you to see Atheists in a softer light, if you will.
1 Timothy 4:10

For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

I think of this scripture and that of Jeremiah, when I write that regardless of whether the Atheist believes in God it does not mean that God does not believe in the Atheist.

I see the community of this Earth as children of God. All people. Even those I see as radicals. Judgment that may be, and still I trust that when there is one God from whence all things sprang then we all are but one family of soul, trying to find our way through life till the day the doors open and call us home.

Having said that in print, I realize I may inspire many Christians to emotion and claiming that is not how a "true" Christian thinks. Projecting that is possible I will say, I have listed my beliefs as Christian seeker. And though I've been quite busy today and not able to peruse the board fully, before I left last time I recall seeing a post that asked something to the effect; Am I a Christian? I have some really strange beliefs.

Though I have not read more than what I recall of the thread title on the "New Posts Menu", maybe this seeker could ask the same thing of herself. Though I do feel and have most of my life, the love and kinship of Christ.

Jeremiah 31:34
For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.


Again, bless you brother for your sincere introspection and daring to be so honest and share your heart here. There are a great many topics on these forums that can bring emotions to a boil, as we all take things personally.
But that's life, isn't it. And what a blessing it is to journey and learn so much from so many. :amen:

God's peace journey with you and all of the CF family. :groupray:

My dear sister,

The Lord Jesus has used you in such a way that I can scarcely take it all in. My heart is full and you cease not to encourage me and help me more than you know, more than you know. I agree with you that God's love is so great that He sent His Son to die for all of us! Not just some of us. Such a love compels me to love Him more and more as the Day draws near.

And I have received this love from your words this day.

I love you Amber Bird,

Yours in Christ
 
Upvote 0

Genersis

Person of Disinterest
Sep 26, 2011
6,073
752
33
London
✟46,200.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Labour
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
That was not my point. My point is that both camps (theist and atheist) are on the same weak ground: there is no way to prove/disprove the existence of a God because we have no way to assess things that are not matter or energy.


As I said, Atheism is not about disproving God.

Most Atheists will readily admit it may be impossible to categorically disprove every possible concept of God (i.e. a Deistic Model of God is certainly unable to be disproven).

It's about a lack of acceptance of existing God claims. We don't find any argument for God that we've been presented with compelling. Therefore we do not believe them to be true.

That doesn't mean we rule them out as impossible, they just haven't met their burden of proof to make acceptance of those claims justifiable.
 
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Mr. Petersen,

I too, used to understand that atheism was the view of not believing in God.

However, from several gentlemen here who have given me a better and deeper understanding of what atheism is today, the position ecompasses a wide ranging and eclectic mixture of ideas, thoughts, beliefs and views.

Most will confirm that atheism is "the lack of belief in gods or God". Now you can better understand the vast amounts of interpretations that may fall under the umbrella of this definition.

The position itself makes no positive assertions as to the existence or non-existence of God. Now assuredly there are some atheists that categorically deny the existence of God. However, I do not think that most atheists here maintain that position though.

I beleive that a good many here simply reserve the right to maintain that they lack a belief in gods or God, and if I may not be presumptuous, I may even say that they do so because they believe that there is no good evidence to believe. This is the position that I believe Belk, and Gadarene hold to, who are two gentlemen I have spoken with at length about this topic.

So if you understand this definition Mr. Petersen, you will be better able to refute it or critique it if you so desire. :idea:

If I am mistaken in what I have said, I hope someone will help me to understand better my error.



That's very well stated.... couldn't have said it better myself :)
 
Upvote 0

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟233,210.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Worship has never required a supernatural being.

I can agree with the definition of atheism being the non-belief in any supernatural power or being, but that is different than a non-belief in a god...which is humanly impossible.

Everyone has a god or gods.
How are you defining God? Is our family our God? Would you consider our children our God? Please explain what it is that you call God.

Ken
 
Upvote 0

jpcedotal

Old School from the Backwoods - Christian Style
May 26, 2009
4,244
239
In between Deliverance and Brother, Where Art Thou
✟28,293.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
As was just pointed out to you, the atheist position is not "god does not exist". It is "I do not believe in a god or gods.". A lack of evidence is why atheists are atheists in the first place.

I think that is a statement of the a minority of atheists, not the majority. Almost all the atheists on here will tell you under no uncertain terms that God does not exist.

One way strong atheists and fundamental Christians are alike is that neither group gives two cents about political correctness.

Don't get me wrong, I can respect a person who puts "personal believed truth" over political correctness any day...right or wrong.

The "I do not believe" argument just doesn't wash for me. That is not the atheists movement stance.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
all the atheists on here will tell you under no uncertain terms that God does not exist.

No, that sort of atheist is definitely in the minority. What most will say is that they aren't convinced by arguments in favor of God's existence, so they lack belief.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

jpcedotal

Old School from the Backwoods - Christian Style
May 26, 2009
4,244
239
In between Deliverance and Brother, Where Art Thou
✟28,293.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
How are you defining God? Is our family our God? Would you consider our children our God? Please explain what it is that you call God.

Ken

yes. one's children and/or wife can be one's god.

Matthew 10:34-37 "Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. (35) For I have come to 'SET A MAN AGAINST HIS FATHER, A DAUGHTER AGAINST HER MOTHER, AND A DAUGHTER-IN-LAW AGAINST HER MOTHER-IN-LAW'; (36) and 'A MAN'S ENEMIES WILL BE THOSE OF HIS OWN HOUSEHOLD.' (37) He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me.

This is Jesus Christ Himself talking.

Anything or anyone a person puts above God is his/her god...
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,538
14,999
Seattle
✟1,128,821.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Mr. Petersen,

I too, used to understand that atheism was the view of not believing in God.

However, from several gentlemen here who have given me a better and deeper understanding of what atheism is today, the position ecompasses a wide ranging and eclectic mixture of ideas, thoughts, beliefs and views.

Most will confirm that atheism is "the lack of belief in gods or God". Now you can better understand the vast amounts of interpretations that may fall under the umbrella of this definition.

The position itself makes no positive assertions as to the existence or non-existence of God. Now assuredly there are some atheists that categorically deny the existence of God. However, I do not think that most atheists here maintain that position though.

I beleive that a good many here simply reserve the right to maintain that they lack a belief in gods or God, and if I may not be presumptuous, I may even say that they do so because they believe that there is no good evidence to believe. This is the position that I believe Belk, and Gadarene hold to, who are two gentlemen I have spoken with at length about this topic.

So if you understand this definition Mr. Petersen, you will be better able to refute it or critique it if you so desire. :idea:

If I am mistaken in what I have said, I hope someone will help me to understand better my error.


The only part I would change is the bolded. Atheists themselves hold a wide range of beliefs since the only common denominator is their lack of belief in a god. Atheism, in and of itself, encompasses only one idea.

Other then that I believe I would agree with your post. :wave:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archaeopteryx
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.