Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Says you - I for one want to know if AB is targeting children, I find it odd you do not.
Because Ted Cruz isn't a regulator or prosecutor. He's claiming that this is to determine if new laws need to be made, but he's focusing on one small campaign by only one distributor, so that claim is doubtful.How do you know Cruz has no need of the data? AB could work to convince him and now everyone else they are not doing what they are accused of.
Don't you want to know if AB is targeting children ... or ?
Still no reply to the question, just word salad.Great Mister Cruz can try for a subpoena if he wants to attempt that, but I’m going to guess that that option isn’t within his purview so he’s stuck with writing strongly worded letters to AB-INBev and issuing press releases.
The plate-spinners on Ed Sullivan were only slightly less entertaining.
AB-INBev are protected against unreasonable searches and seizures by the Amendment that comes Two places after the Second Amendment (which is all the further some seem to go with regard to the Bill of Rights); additionally the Fifth Amendment protects them for self-incrimination which they’d waive should they turn over these document without more than a “pretty-please” from the Junior Senator.Self incrimination? Why what ever could you mean by that?
So the accused says they are innocent, now that make a lot of sense.We do know, because the actual body responsible for determining that has said it wasn't.
Should we stop investigating whether there need to be new laws to protect children?Because Ted Cruz isn't a regulator or prosecutor. He's claiming that this is to determine if new laws need to be made, but he's focusing on one small campaign by only one distributor, so that claim is doubtful.
How does investigating whether or not children are being targeted by a corporation for alcohol consumption, equate to attacking the "woke crowd?"AB-INBev are protected against unreasonable searches and seizures by the Amendment that comes Two places after the Second Amendment (which is all the further some seem to go with regard to the Bill of Rights); additionally the Fifth Amendment protects them for self-incrimination which they’d waive should they turn over these document without more than a “pretty-please” from the Junior Senator.
Cruz is a lawyer and knows all of this, but also knows the base won’t care if he’s ”going after the woke crowd”.
Who regulates such activity?No, the regulators say they are innocent.
I generally don’t answer loaded questions as a rule.
Good!
I see no reason to start it because of Cruz's work.When are we going to start doing that?
Perhaps if such a strong connection hadn't been formed between trans and children, the perceived threat would be less palpable. These days trans and children seems to go together like bread and butter.
When did he say that? Do you have a link; or did you just make that up?
Did the review board review the demographics that AB studied before they created this ad?
Doubt it!
“Maybe they’re all in on it?”Is this review board composed of corporations within the industry, who might also benefit from targeting children?
Why doesn’t Ted contact the ATF since this is probably in their bailiwick?Since this industry is self regulating; isn't that like the fox guarding the hen house?
Right here:How does investigating whether or not children are being targeted by a corporation for alcohol consumption, equate to attacking the "woke crowd?"
The demographics that AB collected will demonstrate their intent.It’s in your OP. He’s alleging that the sponsorship deal is an avenue for marketing alcohol to children. For his allegations to be valid, there has to be some link between Mulvaney and kids, in order for AB to exploit it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?