Speedwell
Well-Known Member
- May 11, 2016
- 23,928
- 17,625
- 81
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Other Religion
- Marital Status
- Married
It was an age of great Messianic expectation and there were various genealogies floating around--which is why Matthew's is slightly different. During the Victorian era it was fashionable to construct genealogies showing the Queen's descent form King Arthur. Do you suppose those genealogies proved anything about King Arthur?'The truth' is a little strong to be used here, don't you think?
Here's another way to consider it... 'Why' in a time when bloodline was so important, which you would think included record-keeping and ensuring its survival (especially for the priesthood), did it just disappear for them (destroyed by something maybe)? Later, Luke was able to get Jesus’ genealogy back through Noah to Adam.
Upvote
0