This source is from one man who is a clothes seller in the UK.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Observatory_for_Human_Rights
Upvote
0
It's really tragic what's going on in there, but honestly, how many good political options there are to actually do something for Western nations?
I read it in a german magazine a few weeks ago. I'm not sure if I can find it as an english web link, but I have little problem believing it.
This source is from one man who is a clothes seller in the UK.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Observatory_for_Human_Rights
Coordinate air support with Russia, which unlike any Western country, actually has permission to be there, or just stay out of it completely.
(against rebels who are fighting against ISIS AND the regime)
With all my anger at the US government for targeting groups besides ISIS, at least the US actually does try to hurt ISIS unlike Russia/Assad who often avoid targeting it.
Not possible. Attacking one objectively helps the other.
If they were really interested in fighting ISIS they would come to an agreement with the government. Instead they talk about committing terrorist acts against Russia to punish them for their intervention. Ask the Chechens how well that works.
Try? Trying and a $5 bill will get you a latte at Starbuck's. The US has been lobbing bombs for over a year with no real results, because air power is only effective militarily when it is coordinated with troops on the ground. Russia's airstrikes are coordinated with the Syrian army, which is why they are effective.
I'm sure that it only appears to be speculation to you.
And why would they come to an agreement with the regime that kills the most civilians in Syria?
They are interested in fighting both ISIS and the regime which is exactly what they've been doing since the end of 2013.
So effective that they hit ISIS territory less than 20% of the time and manage to help ISIS gain land. What a competent group!
To fight ISIS, obviously.
Which first?
ISIS is not the only danger to Syria's stability. As I've pointed out, it's the most immediate danger either. Russian military doctrine hold that it's not how much land you hold that matters, but how many of the enemy you kill.
So they'd come to an agreement with the regime that has killed almost 200k civilians to fight against another group that has killed almost 3k civilians in Syria. That's an utterly preposterous proposal.
Obviously the regime as it was and still is the cause of the most destruction in Syria.
Seeing the starving children of Madaya is shocking – but so is the world’s neglectHorrific images and stories of starving children have suddenly flooded the media as the reality of life in the town of Madaya in Syria, besieged by Syrian regime sources and Hezbollah, has surfaced.
Madaya: residents of besieged Syrian town say they are being starved to deathThough a wooded hill is nearby, snipers have a clear shot, and residents said more than a dozen people had been killed trying to retrieve firewood. They also said children had lost limbs trying to gather grass to eat from nearby fields.
“You don’t see a child whose eyes aren’t sunken and staring from hunger.”