Super-Continent Pangaea

[joshua 1 9]

And they are convicted with real evidence, based on real laws.

When you can establish any of these religious based threats are real, feel free.

Yes they are based on Man's law. All of science is evidence for the Law's of God. You can deny God's moral laws if you want. But then you will have to deny that the shooting in Orlando ever took place. Christians represent the GRACE of God. Muslims represent the LAW of God. Everyone gets to choose if they want the GRACE of God or the LAW of God. If your going to try to defend Evolution, THEN you are going to have to come up with an explanation for all of this. Which you fail to do. So creationism wins out by default because evolution failed to show up and present their care. In fact there are getting to be fewer and fewer evolutionist ready, willing and able to present any sort of a defense for Darwin's theory.

 

[bhsmte]

Yes they are based on Man's law. All of science is evidence for the Law's of God. You can deny God's moral laws if you want. But then you will have to deny that the shooting in Orlando ever took place. Christians represent the GRACE of God. Muslims represent the LAW of God. Everyone gets to choose if they want the GRACE of God or the LAW of God. If your going to try to defend Evolution, THEN you are going to have to come up with an explanation for all of this. Which you fail to do. So creationism wins out by default because evolution failed to show up and present their care. In fact there are getting to be fewer and fewer evolutionist ready, willing and able to present any sort of a defense for Darwin's theory.

LOL

 

[joshua 1 9]

I don't see any scientific evidence.

You so not see any scientific evidence for the agricultural or neolithic revolutions? If you want to argue that Adam was not a real person then you have to accept that Adam was a allegory dealing with the beginning of agriculture. Gen 3:23 "Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken." Adam was the first man to till the ground. Perhaps it would do you some good to do a little research and study on the subject.

http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/History_of_agriculture

 

[-57]

This evidence would be from legit geologists, correct?

I ask because, it was a group of Christian geologists, that first slammed the door on acknowledging there was zero scientific evidence of a global flood ever happening.

I'm sorry your ignorances causes you to feel that way.

 

[joshua 1 9]

LOL

That is your defense for Darwin's theory? You expect tons and tons and tons of evidence from me and what do you give me in return? Nothing? Zip, Zero, Zilch, that is your contribution to the discussion?

 

[-57]

You so not see any scientific evidence for the agricultural or neolithic revolutions? If you want to argue that Adam was not a real person then you have to accept that Adam was a allegory dealing with the beginning of agriculture. Gen 3:23 "Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken." Adam was the first man to till the ground. Perhaps it would do you some good to do a little research and study on the subject.

http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/History_of_agriculture

Of course Adam was the first man to till the ground...Adam was the first man God created.
As you said "Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken."

 

[bhsmte]

That is your defense for Darwin's theory? You expect tons and tons and tons of evidence from me and what do you give me in return? Nothing? Zip, Zero, Zilch, that is your contribution to the discussion?

Garbage in, garbage out.

 

[bhsmte]

I'm sorry your ignorances causes you to feel that way.

You can provide that evidence whenever it is convenient for you.

 

[joshua 1 9]

You can provide that evidence whenever it is convenient for you.

It is your turn and we are waiting for YOU to present YOUR evidence.

 

[bhsmte]

It is your turn and we are waiting for YOU to present YOUR evidence.

Shifting the burden is weak, real weak.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Why is that, dad? Well, because dad says so.

My son Graduated Manga Cum Laude with a 3.969, He knows more about it then I do. He would have gotten a 4.0 but I wanted him to develop social and communication skills so I wanted him to invest some of his energy into that. My first son taught me how to use computers when he was Kindergarten. He always knew more about it then me. In fact that was how I got started using the computer. His aunt bought him an Amiga 500 and I played with it more then he did. But he understood it better then me.

 

[bhsmte]

My son Graduated Manga Cum Laude with a 3.969, He knows more about it then I do. He would have gotten a 4.0 but I wanted him to develop social and communication skills so I wanted him to invest some of his energy into that. My first son taught me how to use computers when he was Kindergarten. He always knew more about it then me. In fact that was how I got started using the computer. His aunt bought him an Amiga 500 and I played with it more then he did. But he understood it better then me.

And this post has what to do with the discussion?

 

[joshua 1 9]

Shifting the burden is weak, real weak.

Yes that is exactly what I am telling you. Your agreement is to weak to be taken serious. Glad that you understand the point I am making.

 

[joshua 1 9]

And this post has what to do with the discussion?

No this post has to do with the post I was responding to.

 

[bhsmte]

Yes that is exactly what I am telling you. Your agreement is to weak to be taken serious. Glad that you understand the point I am making.

Demonstrate how I have shifted the burden?

I will await patiently, but won't hold my breath.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Demonstrate how I have shifted the burden?

By investing all of your energy into the passive aggressive behavior of doing nothing. Ie your using all of your energy to stop yourself from taking action to actually do something.

 

[-57]

You can provide that evidence whenever it is convenient for you.

Why? So you can reply back with your typical ad-hominem attacks?

 

[bhsmte]

Why? So you can reply back with your typical ad-hominem attacks?

Probably so we can see this scientific evidence you claim to have, to demonstrate this biblical flood happened.

But hey, if you don't want to present this evidence, I understand.

 

[bhsmte]

By investing all of your energy into the passive aggressive behavior of doing nothing. Ie your using all of your energy to stop yourself from taking action to actually do something.

What action should I be taking?

 

[joshua 1 9]

What action should I be taking?

You should actually be doing some research to become informed about the topic. That is not going to happen though because you have alternative motives for your rhetoric. So you would first need to find a more functional and healthy way to deal with your issues. Although in your case your issue seems to be with boredom more then anything else.