• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Super-Continent Pangaea

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
61
✟100,301.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
image.jpeg
The Canaanites were their cousins, since the Canaanites came from Ham and the Jews from Shem. :doh:

Your "we have met the enemy and they are us" Chicagoan philosophy does not apply.
You are prone to makeing false accusations that you can't substantiate.

Biblical scholars have known for a long time that the OT books were redacted based on an analysis of the material. And anyone with a little common sence, outside of the childish threats of hell, can see the rediculous claims for themselves.

And the Israelites do still in fact suffer from their own expectations that their ansestors wrote about in the scriptures that they largely invented.

Meanwhile, in realville, 2,000 years after the so called Jewish Messah left without fulfilling the false hopes of an ill conceived nationalist King, there is a mosque built on top of the flattened temple.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,103
52,639
Guam
✟5,147,017.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Canaanites were their cousins, since the Canaanites came from Ham and the Jews from Shem.
You are prone to makeing false accusations that you can't substantiate.
Really?

What's this?

Genesis 10:6 And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan.

Luke 3:34 Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor,
35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala,
36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,
Colter said:
Biblical scholars have known for a long time that the OT books were redacted based on an analysis of the material.
Even if that was true, I've never heard of the lineage being redacted.
Colter said:
And anyone with a little common sence, outside of the childish threats of hell, can see the rediculous claims for themselves.
I've got a little common sence [sic], show me.
Colter said:
And the Israelites do still in fact suffer from their own expectations that their ansestors wrote about in the scriptures that they largely invented.
What does this have to do with the Jews being the Canaanites' cousin?
Colter said:
Meanwhile, in realville, 2,000 years after the so called Jewish Messah left without fulfilling the false hopes of an ill conceived nationalist King, there is a mosque built on top of the flattened temple.
Realville says Jesus fulfilled 109 of 333 prophecies concerning Him; and He will fulfill the other 224 when He returns.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
61
✟100,301.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
What's that? Its the CNN-like Hebrew priest writing fake news, motivated by the desire to trace their all important blood lines back to Adam who they assumed was the first man. They appropriated existing stories in Mesopotamia when they went on their nationalist ego trip. In doing so they had God mix up the languages to account for the existing races and cultures all over the earth, cultures that predate the creation story by tens of thousands of years.

* In the scriptures of Judaism, God had no divine Son, and their Messiah wasn't going to leave for 2000+ years. They mistranslated the same prophets that their forefathers had abused.

* The Jews never destroyed all the Canaanite's.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,103
52,639
Guam
✟5,147,017.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What's that? Its the CNN-like Hebrew priest writing fake news, motivated by the desire to trace their all important blood lines back to Adam who they assumed was the first man.
Like I said, your Chicago-based authors wrote a book that's anti-Semitic.
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
61
✟100,301.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Like I said, your Chicago-based authors wrote a book that's anti-Semitic.
And you never provided any evidence because you aren't an honest person.

Besides, the Old Testament books are racist, written by the same anti-Christ faction who conspired to kill Jesus and held utter contempt for the Gentile world.
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Besides, the Old Testament books are racist, written by the same anti-Christ faction who conspired to kill Jesus and held utter contempt for the Gentile world.
Uh... don't people usually argue that the coming of Jesus was a prophecy among the Jewish people?

From my understanding of history, Jesus was crucified because his preaching was actually breaking a law in and of itself, and his doing so alienated some of the Jewish people that did not view him as the Christ. -_- the "Gentile world" at the time would have been what, a few dozen people, maybe a thousand if all witnesses of his "miracles" were different people and all converted?

From the perspective of most people at the time, Christianity would have been a dangerous and growing cult.

-_- also, the Dead Sea Scrolls and other ancient texts conclusively demonstrate that the Old Testament existed for hundreds of years before the New Testament, and people tried their hardest not to mistranslate.
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
61
✟100,301.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Uh... don't people usually argue that the coming of Jesus was a prophecy among the Jewish people?

From my understanding of history, Jesus was crucified because his preaching was actually breaking a law in and of itself, and his doing so alienated some of the Jewish people that did not view him as the Christ. -_- the "Gentile world" at the time would have been what, a few dozen people, maybe a thousand if all witnesses of his "miracles" were different people and all converted?

From the perspective of most people at the time, Christianity would have been a dangerous and growing cult.

-_- also, the Dead Sea Scrolls and other ancient texts conclusively demonstrate that the Old Testament existed for hundreds of years before the New Testament, and people tried their hardest not to mistranslate.
The OT books as we now have them, date to the Babylonian captivity period when they were redacted. The Dead Sea scrolls are later.

The Gentile world was anything other than the so called Israelites. They actually had to begin to accept converts from the Gentiles due to their dwindling numbers. There was a Court of the Gentiles in the temple.

There were some hazy prophecies that hinted about a coming savior (also known outside of Judaism). Jesus was forced into other prophecies which is in dispute.
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
The Gentile world was anything other than the so called Israelites. They actually had to begin to accept converts from the Gentiles due to their dwindling numbers. There was a Court of the Gentiles in the temple.
Looked up the definition of Gentile, you are correct in that it refers to anyone that is not Jewish.

There were some hazy prophecies that hinted about a coming savior (also known outside of Judaism). Jesus was forced into other prophecies which is in dispute.
Most things about Jesus are in dispute. Saying something is known outside of a religious group doesn't mean the ideas didn't originate with that group. I know some of the ideals of Scientology, but I want no part of that.
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
61
✟100,301.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Looked up the definition of Gentile, you are correct in that it refers to anyone that is not Jewish.


Most things about Jesus are in dispute. Saying something is known outside of a religious group doesn't mean the ideas didn't originate with that group. I know some of the ideals of Scientology, but I want no part of that.
I was thinking of the 3 Magi from a far away land that knew if the impending birth. It's a funny thing, the Magi weren't Jews but they believed that a savior was coming into the world from within the Jewish people.
 
Upvote 0