Summing Up My Work's Main Idea & Conclusion

[Humble Penny]

I've written and said quite a bit on biblical world chronology and it seems the main idea is lost within the mountain of information provided. This I am rectifying today by explaining in brief what my work is implying:

Main Idea
The original original Scriptures record a Creation Date of -5470 BC meaning there are:

• 5,470 Years from Adam to the birth of Christ in 0 BC/1 AD
• 5,500 Years from Adam to the death of Christ in 30 AD
• 6,000 Years from Adam to the Second Coming of Christ 530 AD

Since this is so there are:

• 530 Years from the birth of Christ to His Second Coming
• 500 Years from the Death of Christ to His Second Coming

Conclusion
Since 5470 AM + 530 Years = 6000 AM
And 5500 AM + 500 Years = 6000 AM
Our current Anno Domini year of 2021-2022 AD is incorrect as it would not fit with Scripture or prophecy which truthfully tell us about world history. Therefore many of the dates after Constantine the Great were falsified and put in the wrong chronological order for the many wars and kingdoms should have all happened at the same time: for Daniel tells us we are living in the 5th age of the Great Statue whose Feet are of Iron mixed with Clay.

 

[Petros2015]

500 Years from the Death of Christ to His Second Coming

? are you saying Christ died less than 500 years ago ?
I can understand the calendar being off a year or two, but not 1,500+...

 

[Humble Penny]

? are you saying Christ died less than 500 years ago ?
I can understand the calendar being off a year or two, but not 1,500+...

Well that is exactly where the evidence is pointing towards. Now as I stated in my conclusion, I'm not declaring all of the history we learned to be false, I'm simply saying that they were placed at the wrong time periods to make it look as if +2,000 Years passed from Christ...and the only way to do that is to set the date of creation at a later time like -4004 BC or -3761 BC...and for this to be feasible you need to shorten the times from Adam to the birth of Abraham.

 

[Benjamin Müller]

?

You're saying the Second Coming of Jesus Christ occurred in 530 AD?

 

[Humble Penny]

?

You're saying the Second Coming of Jesus Christ occurred in 530 AD?

Slight correction, the Second Coming of Christ did not occur in 530 AD but...will occur in 530 AD
My work is showing that we aren't actually living in the 21st Century AD but the 6th Century AD. And this is just following the data provided by the Septuagint and world history.

 

[Humble Penny]

? are you saying Christ died less than 500 years ago ?
I can understand the calendar being off a year or two, but not 1,500+...

?

You're saying the Second Coming of Jesus Christ occurred in 530 AD?

Slight correction, the Second Coming of Christ did not occur in 530 AD but...will occur in 530 AD
My work is showing that we aren't actually living in the 21st Century AD but the 6th Century AD. And this is just following the data provided by the Septuagint and world history.

Now of course to be fair in all of this one would have to show two things for my work to be false:

1. The Masoretic Text predates the Septuagint.
2. The Septuagint inflated the numbers of the Masoretic Text in Genesis 5 & 11.

 

[Petros2015]

Now of course to be fair in all of this one would have to show two things for my work to be false:

Christianity in China - Wikipedia

Timelines: CHINA | Asia for Educators | Columbia University

 

[Humble Penny]

Christianity in China - Wikipedia

Timelines: CHINA | Asia for Educators | Columbia University

Try again dear brother... You can't address world history without addressing the date of creation and the Septuagint and Masoretic Text.

 

[Petros2015]

You can't address world history without addressing the date of creation and the Septuagint and Masoretic Text.

I think you are confusing me with you.

 

[Humble Penny]

I think you are confusing me with you.

Actually before I gave the summary of my work in this post my blog and the Messianic Judaism forum show all of my work. So I've not confused the two of us dear brother.

 

[Humble Penny]

Try again dear brother... You can't address world history without addressing the date of creation and the Septuagint and Masoretic Text.

I think you are confusing me with you.

Actually before I gave the summary of my work in this post my blog and the Messianic Judaism forum show all of my work. So I've not confused the two of us dear brother.

This blog post of mine will get you up to speed on my work:

Did Methuselah Die 14 Years After The Flood?

 

[Petros2015]

It's interesting work, but to say we've had 1500 years deleted by conspiracy on one part of the world doesn't gel with the rest of the world having its history well documented. Can't have Christian missionaries in China 7th century AD and then another 1300 years of Chinese history on top of it if we haven't reached 7th century AD yet.

But thanks for sharing

 

[Humble Penny]

It's interesting work, but to say we've had 1500 years deleted by conspiracy on one part of the world doesn't gel with the rest of the world having its history well documented. Can't have Christen missionaries in China 7th century AD and then another 1300 years of Chinese history on top of it if we haven't reached 7th century AD yet.

But thanks for sharing

Actually you'll see I haven't even left that stone unturned:

Auditing The Chroniclers

You'll see that there was a major orchestrated conspiracy to cover up the first and second coming of Christ in that blog post.

 

[Humble Penny]

It's interesting work, but to say we've had 1500 years deleted by conspiracy on one part of the world doesn't gel with the rest of the world having its history well documented. Can't have Christen missionaries in China 7th century AD and then another 1300 years of Chinese history on top of it if we haven't reached 7th century AD yet.

But thanks for sharing

And keep in mind no one, I mean zero people were using the Anno Domini timeline prior to Dionysius Exiguous creating it in 525 AD. Aside from each nation having their own unique dating system, the Jews and Christians were the only ones using the ancient Anno Mundi system to synchronize the otherwise disjointed dates of kingdoms by aligninging the key figures mentioned in the Bible with the official records and histories of their respective kingdoms.

To put this into perspective:

• The Septuagint/LXX covers 5,500 Years from creation in -5470 BC to the death of Christ in 5500 AM/30 AD.
• Eusebius of Caesarea is the only ancient Church historian who covers the 300 Years from the death of Christ to the 20th Anniversary of Constantius in 5800 AM/330 AD.

This data alone shows the world wouldn't be using the Anno Domini timeline for another 195 Years or put another way: no one used the Anno Domini timeline until 5,995 Years had passed from Adam. This is clearly incorrect as it means we are in the 2nd Year of the 70th Week of Daniel, and we know that's not true because the 3rd Temple hasn't been rebuilt yet not are the Jews sacrificing.

 

[Humble Penny]

To show everyone that I am not simply favoring the Septuagint/LXX over the Masorteic Text or any other biblical manuscript please read my clear and succint views in posts #95-98 on page 5 of this thread:

Date of Christ's Crucifixation

There I show straight from the Masoretic Text and the Greek version of Luke 3:23 that Christ died in 30 AD and the 69 Weeks/483 Years begins with Cyrus the Great and not Artaxerxes I.

 

[daq]

Slight correction, the Second Coming of Christ did not occur in 530 AD but...will occur in 530 AD
My work is showing that we aren't actually living in the 21st Century AD but the 6th Century AD. And this is just following the data provided by the Septuagint and world history.

So then, if we are living in the sixth century AD, as you say, that means the return of Messiah is less than thirty years away because, according to what you say, he will return in 530AD, which is the sixth century.

I'm not sure exactly where in the sixth century you believe we are, but at the very least that means 530AD, (according to your calculations), is less than thirty years away.

Moreover, and this is one of the more fascinating aspects of what you are saying, according to your calculations the 1611 King James Bible was actually translated published in 119 AD. That's 89 years after your dating of the crucifixion.

 

[Humble Penny]

So then, if we are living in the sixth century AD, as you say, that means the return of Messiah is less than thirty years away because, according to what you say, he will return in 530AD, which is the sixth century.

I'm not sure exactly where in the sixth century you believe we are, but at the very least that means 530AD, (according to your calculations), is less than thirty years away.

Moreover, and this is one of the more fascinating aspects of what you are saying, according to your calculations the 1611 King James Bible was actually translated in 119 AD. That's 89 years after your dating of the crucifixion.

Yes well the work on my blog shows see are precisely in the year 5977 AM...and this came about after critiquing the work of rabbi Simon Schwab's Comparative Jewish Chronology, whose paper I also have on my blog and elsewhere in the Messianic Judaism forum for people to freely download and view themselves.

And as you rightly assess this would alter all dates occuring after 476 AD, or in short completely ruin the Middle Ages period. That said we can say for certain that some high level historians and chronologists not only created certain false histories, but also deliberately stretched out the time of certain events and the reigns of kings connected to them to make it look as if they happened in succession as opposed to simultaneously.

Aside from this it is well known among academia that the Catholic church created many false written documents and relics in order to promote some false idea, obtain material goods, or simply help them to escape the law by keeping all judges and kings out of the matters of their "holy church". And it is also very odd how one dimensional the Middle Ages are...especially when you consider the pope having his hand in nearly everything and all rulers needing to get his approval and say so on matters...it's very euro-centric with a few non-europeans thrown in as an after thought...and overall a very suspicious time as it is the only period in history where we seem to have the most perfect records kept which preserve an "unbroken narrative".

 

[Humble Penny]

@daq Really if you think about it we can only account for the last 122 Years from the 19th Century to the 21st Century AD plus 2 Decades and 2 Years. And right around 1910 the number of modern cars outnumbered horses for mode of transportation; and by 1920 the motorized truck supplanted the horse drawn buggy. So from creation until about 110-112 Years ago the whole world was using the horse for everything.

In reality were we really 2,000 Years removed from Christ and Rome? Well our civic buildings and their Roman style of architecture would say no. And you'd think two millennia would be more than enough time for another world power to rise and we wouldn't be using the letters of the Roman or Latin Alphabet! Sure we haven't had any official Roman Emperors ruling the world for sometime, but it is clear that each country and nation has worked on using imperialist tactics to dominate their neighbors...all while under the guise of democracy or the republic...or whatever other silly front of non-kingdom government they want to espouse in the midst of their double speak and rhetoric.

 

[daq]

@daq Really if you think about it we can only account for the last 122 Years from the 19th Century to the 21st Century AD plus 2 Decades and 2 Years. And right around 1910 the number of modern cars outnumbered horses for mode of transportation; and by 1920 the motorized truck supplanted the horse drawn buggy. So from creation until about 110-112 Years ago the whole world was using the horse for everything.

In reality we're we really 2,000 Years removed from Christ and Rome? Well our civic buildings and their Roman style of architecture would say no. And you'd think two millennia would be more than enough time for another world power to rise and we wouldn't be using the letters of the Roman or Latin Alphabet! Sure we haven't had any official Roman Emperors ruling the world for sometime, but it is clear that each country and nation has worked on using imperialist tactics to dominate their neighbors...all while under the guise of democracy or the republic...or whatever other silly front of non-kingdom government they want to espouse in the midst of their double speak and rhetoric.

Speaking of the Roman or Latin alphabet, you reminded me of the invention of the printing press, and the first ever printed book known as the Gutenberg Bible.

Let's see, if it was not around 1455AD it would rather be, according to your calculations, another 156 years before the KJV Bible was published, and thus, 119AD minus 156 years, or better said, 38BC, (without a "zero year" between 1BC and 1AD).

So then, according to your theory, the Gutenberg Bible was published before the advent of the Messiah.

 

[Humble Penny]

Speaking of the Roman or Latin alphabet, you reminded me of the invention of the printing press, and the first ever printed book known as the Gutenberg Bible.

Let's see, if it was not around 1455AD it would rather be, according to your calculations, another 156 years before the KJV Bible was published, and thus, 119AD minus 156 years, or better said, 38BC, (without a "zero year" between 1BC and 1AD).

So then, according to your theory, the Gutenberg Bible was published before the advent of the Messiah.

Yes brother you're correct again in your assessment here, and I came to the same conclusion as you did. That is why I said that we haven't been told all the historical facts truthfully, I'm really pleased you do understand the implications of my work.