• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Sufficient vs Necessary

shturt678s

Regular Member
Dec 11, 2013
2,733
118
✟25,797.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
I also don't believe that repentance and faith comes from 'natural theology'. My point is that from natural theology, men have no excuse for recognizing God exists. Combine that with the fact that God created mankind to seek Him, from Acts 17:26-27, and from natural theology, the seeking of God (for relationship) will result in coming face to face with the gospel.

Let's take to the bank the little one's at conception have precious souls, ie, after one hits 70 for some reason one has a tremendous and exponential caring for the little ones? However let's put the latter on hold for now as is a difficult passage, and not only agree to agree with the former - well stated with perspicuity. :thumbsup:

I guess I'm not getting your point about "distressing the kingdom". Sorry.

As to aborted fetuses, (an infant has been born), the issue is whethere they have a soul or not. That's why I mentioned Traducianism.


I agree.


:) Which is why I call my NIV the "nearly inspired version". Usually gets a chuckle in my SS class.

:thumbsup: :amen: :thumbsup:

Head's up: What I've been contending with for decades is until one meets the Truth (IIThess.2:10b) can the burden of the documents of IIThess.2 for example be construed with Rev.8:13-9:21 where all comports, and those that don't meet the Truth God nowhere states where they end up for forever, ie, absolutely another Sphinx kind of thread - no chuckle here, however a chuckle with you with your SS class. :amen:

Old Jack
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Heb.11:1, "firm confidence....conviction regarding things not seen." The A.V.'s "the substance of things hoped for" goes back to aquinas and to others who rendered it substantia and to the idea of Chrysostom: faith, for instance, takes the resurrection, which is not yet a reality, and "substantiates" it in our soul. Not good, however will have to reject along with others for religious reasons and understand. :o

"evidence": Because "elegxos" is used also in the sense of "proof" some prefer this meaning in the present connection. Thus the A.V. renders "evidence," which the R.V. seeks to improve by rendering the word as a term expressing as anction: "the proving". The A.V. perpetuates the idea of the Vulgate which has rendered the word argumentum.

Mr. Calvin didn't help matters with his evidentia. But we cannot conceive of faith as proof, evidence, an action of proving something unseen or an argument for unseen things. Again you folks will have to disagree so won't expound any further. :idea:

Old Jack

Too many today see faith as a token a currency whereby we please God and as a result (which indicates merit) salvation is granted , they come to this conclusion because they misunderstand Romans 4 , "Abraham believed God and it was reckoned to Him as righteousness ". They mistake the "it" for their faith and see Abrahams reward as being salvation by being justified because he believed !

But what is the "it" referring to ? And is faith in anyway meritous ?

Soteriology is a massive subject , covering many topics and many sides to a doctrine , salvation is past present as well as future . Salvation has several causes , ultimate as well as proximate .

If a man can be saved even before Christ's sacrifice (OT saints ) then why is I too difficult to see salvation secured even before any believe ?

Faith today by and large has been turned into a work , by it many think themselves to be saved because they by their faith obeyed , they unlike others didn't resist , didn't stop up their ears , and truly believe their actions account for their salvation seeing as it is available to each and every person , they , whether they will admit it or not , think "if only my neighbour hadn't hardened his heart and disbelieved they too could have been saved just like me " not realising it is. God that made the difference , it is Grace not free will that saves .

Yet faith is , when truly understood , a renunciation of merits , why?

Because it is faith in another FOR righteousness ! It is faith in another's power ,will , ability and word.

I mean we are no match for Satan , and we are saved by an obedience wrought in us , we are becoming tamed , and our faith is of no merit , because it is imperfect and often lacking , we are saved by Gods unchanging grace and love , Christ won the victory not us , Christ chose us not we Him , Christ leads and chastens , faith is but an instrument , we receive the atonement by faith . This cannot be a work of man , it's not even a joint venture , salvation is by the discretion of God worked in and through faith .

If God were to withdraw His Grace today none could remain saved .
 
Upvote 0

shturt678s

Regular Member
Dec 11, 2013
2,733
118
✟25,797.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Too many today see faith as a token a currency whereby we please God and as a result (which indicates merit) salvation is granted , they come to this conclusion because they misunderstand Romans 4 , "Abraham believed God and it was reckoned to Him as righteousness ". They mistake the "it" for their faith and see Abrahams reward as being salvation by being justified because he believed !

But what is the "it" referring to ? And is faith in anyway meritous ?

Rom.4:3, "it" = "believed"

Soteriology is a massive subject , covering many topics and many sides to a doctrine , salvation is past present as well as future . Salvation has several causes , ultimate as well as proximate .

If a man can be saved even before Christ's sacrifice (OT saints ) then why is I too difficult to see salvation secured even before any believe ?

Faith today by and large has been turned into a work , by it many think themselves to be saved because they by their faith obeyed , they unlike others didn't resist , didn't stop up their ears , and truly believe their actions account for their salvation seeing as it is available to each and every person , they , whether they will admit it or not , think "if only my neighbour hadn't hardened his heart and disbelieved they too could have been saved just like me " not realising it is. God that made the difference , it is Grace not free will that saves .

Yet faith is , when truly understood , a renunciation of merits , why?

Because it is faith in another FOR righteousness ! It is faith in another's power ,will , ability and word. I mean we are no match for Satan ,

and we are saved by an obedience wrought in us ,

"and we are saved at one's 'instant of faith' as was Abraham, ie, obedience as the result of 'faith'. btw 'conviction' is wrought in us and 'faith' is produced in us. :idea:

we are becoming tamed , and our faith is of no merit , because it is imperfect and often lacking , we are saved by Gods unchanging grace and love , Christ won the victory not us , Christ chose us not we Him , Christ leads and chastens , faith is but an instrument , we receive the atonement by faith . This cannot be a work of man , it's not even a joint venture , salvation is by the discretion of God worked in and through faith .

If God were to withdraw His Grace today none could remain saved .

God has not only withdrew His grace, but has replaced it, eg, IIThess.2:9 & Rev.13:14b. :o Whatever one wants to religiously believe, God will make sure you beleive "it". ;) However there is a small porthole of grace for those that have a right heart condition from heaven's view.

Old Jack

btw about 90% of all the 65% or so Christians of this nation's over 300 million really think they will awake in heaven upon passing where in actuality it's a secret and forensic judgment from heaven where the universe will know publically at the last day thus the ol' OSAS is on sinking sand, ie, only my opinion. :idea:

Decades ago I would ask those in the Church where they would end up upon passing, and they would repond "in heaven" then outside privately I would ask again then many many responded with "no one really knows" Jack as they were quickly distancing themsevles from me. :confused:
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Rom.4:3, "it" = "believed"





"and we are saved at one's 'instant of faith' as was Abraham, ie, obedience as the result of 'faith'. btw 'conviction' is wrought in us and 'faith' is produced in us. :idea:


"And he believed in the Lord; and He counted it to him for righteousness" (Gen. 15:6). The one point to be decided here is: was it Abraham’s faith itself which was in God’s account taken for righteousness (horrible idea!), or, was it the righteousness of God in Christ which Abraham’s faith prospectively laid hold of? The comments of the Apostle in Romans 4:18-22 settle the point decisively. In these verses Paul emphasizes the natural impossibilities which stood in the way of God’s promise of a numerous offspring to Abraham being fulfilled (the genital deadness both of his own body and Sarah’s), and on the implicit confidence he had (notwithstanding the difficulties) in the power and faithfulness of God that He would perform what He promised. Hence, when the Apostle adds, "Therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness" (v. 22), that "therefore" can only mean: Because through faith he completely lost sight of nature and self, and realized with undoubting assurance the sufficiency of the divine arm, and the certainty of its working."
AWP

In Romans 4 we read "his faith is counted for righteousness" (v. 5), "faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness" (v. 9), "it was imputed to him for righteousness" (v. 22). Now in each of these verses the Greek preposition is "eis" which never means "in the stead of," but always signifies "towards, in order to, with a view to": it has the uniform force of "unto." Its exact meaning and force is unequivocally plain in Romans 10:10, "with the heart man believeth unto ["eis"] righteousness": that is, the believing heart reaches out toward and lays hold of Christ Himself. "This passage (Rom. 10:10) may help us to understand what justification by faith is, for it shows that righteousness there comes to us when we embrace God’s goodness offered to us in the Gospel. We are then, for this reason, made just: because we believe that God is propitious to us through Christ" (J. Calvin).
 
Upvote 0

shturt678s

Regular Member
Dec 11, 2013
2,733
118
✟25,797.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
"And he believed in the Lord; and He counted it to him for righteousness" (Gen. 15:6). The one point to be decided here is: was it Abraham’s faith itself which was in God’s account taken for righteousness (horrible idea!),

God didn't think it was a horrible idea in Rom.4:5. One must know the Biblical conception of faith; it's the hand and the heart filled with Christ. It's not just believing, but the possession of Christ. State it thus: God reckons the possession of Christ by faith for righteousness, ie, because of the contents of God-wrought faith. :o

or, was it the righteousness of God in Christ which Abraham’s faith prospectively laid hold of? The comments of the Apostle in Romans 4:18-22 settle the point decisively. In these verses Paul emphasizes the natural impossibilities which stood in the way of God’s promise of a numerous offspring to Abraham being fulfilled (the genital deadness both of his own body and Sarah’s), and on the implicit confidence he had (notwithstanding the difficulties) in the power and faithfulness of God that He would perform what He promised. Hence, when the Apostle adds, "Therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness" (v. 22), that "therefore" can only mean: Because through faith he completely lost sight of nature and self, and realized with undoubting assurance the sufficiency of the divine arm, and the certainty of its working."
AWP

Rom.4:22: This faith, this believing being what it was, "it was reckoned unto him for righteousness." This restates vs.3 & 9 and sums up the vital point of the entire discussion regarding Abraham. Christ, the substance and heart of the promise to Abraham. :idea:

In Romans 4 we read "his faith is counted for righteousness" (v. 5), "faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness" (v. 9), "it was imputed to him for righteousness" (v. 22). Now in each of these verses the Greek preposition is "eis" which never means "in the stead of," but always signifies "towards, in order to, with a view to": it has the uniform force of "unto."

eis "for" regularly used in phrases which signify purpose and also result ("in order to")., eg, "effect" or "sphere" also common. :confused: Also at times uses "towards".

Its exact meaning and force is unequivocally plain in Romans 10:10, "with the heart man believeth unto ["eis"] righteousness": that is, the believing heart reaches out toward and lays hold of Christ Himself. "This passage (Rom. 10:10) may help us to understand what justification by faith is, for it shows that righteousness there comes to us when we embrace God’s goodness offered to us in the Gospel. We are then, for this reason, made just: because we believe that God is propitious to us through Christ" (J. Calvin).

Rom.10:9, 10 Confesses faith already wrought through one's 'instant of faith'. :amen:

Old Jack's opinion
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
RT affirms not denies that Christ died for mankind , not angels etc
The only issue of who Christ died for is the scope. RT claims that He did not die for everyone. I find support from Scripture that He did.
 
Upvote 0

shturt678s

Regular Member
Dec 11, 2013
2,733
118
✟25,797.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Why is everyone not saved then?

Grace is "resistible," for example for those that are obdurate, and those that don't have an agape for the Truth, for example if someone has the Truth on this thread and rejected for whatever religious reason, "gong," "head bump," you understand. :idea:

Old Jack

Don't be concerned about me, ie, I don't have that truth. :o
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Grace is "resistible," for example for those that are obdurate, and those that don't have an agape for the Truth, for example if someone has the Truth on this thread and rejected for whatever religious reason, "gong," "head bump," you understand. :idea:

Old Jack

Don't be concerned about me, ie, I don't have that truth. :o


men choose according to their PREFERENCES , if men had no preferences "choice" would be indifferent , and wouldn't be choice but passivity ; so men are either divided into ;

a) Men who choose Christ because they prefer good .

b) Men who choose sin because they prefer evil.

Christ said men prefer sin , to light , they actually love darkness rather than light (John 3:19)


If there are men created by God who love light rather than darkness then why are all men not created with this propensity ?


why the difference in creation ?

Truth is , either
1. Men are changed from a depraved nature by God ,
or
2. SOME Men are born with a depraved nature while others arn't.

so which is it ?

either way it isn't down to our decision to be born with or without a fallen nature ; a wicked disposition that is at war with God , or on the contrary to be born desiring the light and loving God , which simply describes someone Regenerate anyway !


if men have been born , some good , some bad , how is that anything to do with human choice ? Folks it isn't!!!

either way taking the anti-Calvinist view , or the Biblical view , it all comes down to God's Sovereignty.




.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
men choose according to their PREFERENCES , if men had no preferences "choice" would be indifferent , and wouldn't be choice but passivity ; so men are either divided into ;

a) Men who choose Christ because they prefer good .

b) Men who choose sin because they prefer evil.
This is merely someone's opinion. God created mankind to seek Him for relationship. And He has revealed Himself to mankind, so that no one has an excuse for not seeking Him for relationship.

Men choose Christ because they realize that they are sinners and cannot save themselves. It has nothing to do with "preferring good", whatever that means.

Others reject Christ because they don't realize they are sinners, OR, they think they can earn salvation by works. Either way, they lose.

Christ said men prefer sin , to light , they actually love darkness rather than light (John 3:19)
Generally, but not absolutely everyone.

If there are men created by God who love light rather than darkness then why are all men not created with this propensity ?[/QUOTE}
That's not the question, or issue. All were created to seek Him. But it seems RTR doesn't want to discuss that. And He has revealed Himself to everyone, so that no one has an excuse for not seeking Him. It seems RT doesn't want to discuss that either.

why the difference in creation ?
There is no difference. God created everyone to seek Him and He has revealed His attributes to everyone.

Truth is , either
1. Men are changed from a depraved nature by God ,
or
2. SOME Men are born with a depraved nature while others arn't.

so which is it ?
#1 is true ONLY after one believes and is regenerated. We know that the Bible doesn't teach regeneration before faith.

if men have been born , some good , some bad , how is that anything to do with human choice ? Folks it isn't!!!
Faulty claim. All humans were created to seek God, and He has revealed Himself to everyone. That is what the Bible teaches.

either way taking the anti-Calvinist view , or the Biblical view , it all comes down to God's Sovereignty.
The Biblical view is non-Calvinist as well. God's sovereignty doesn't equate to God choosing who will believe, which is the logical and obvious conclusion of the RT doctrine of election.

God chooses to save those who believe (1 Cor 1:21).

God does NOT choose who will believe, or the Bible would teach that.

If God chose who would believe, Paul's answer to the jailer was quite incorrect, and even disingenuous. He told (imperative=command) the jailer to believe on Christ and he WILL BE SAVED.

Why give such a command IF God chooses who will believe?

I would greatly appreciate an answer to this question. Thanks.
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
FreeGrace2 said:
This is merely someone's opinion. God created mankind to seek Him for relationship. And He has revealed Himself to mankind, so that no one has an excuse for not seeking Him for relationship.

Men choose Christ because they realize that they are sinners and cannot save themselves. It has nothing to do with "preferring good", whatever that means.

Others reject Christ because they don't realize they are sinners, OR, they think they can earn salvation by works. Either way, they lose.


Generally, but not absolutely everyone.

"If there are men created by God who love light rather than darkness then why are all men not created with this propensity ?"
That's not the question, or issue. All were created to seek Him. But it seems RTR doesn't want to discuss that. And He has revealed Himself to everyone, so that no one has an excuse for not seeking Him. It seems RT doesn't want to discuss that either.


There is no difference. God created everyone to seek Him and He has revealed His attributes to everyone.


#1 is true ONLY after one believes and is regenerated. We know that the Bible doesn't teach regeneration before faith.


Faulty claim. All humans were created to seek God, and He has revealed Himself to everyone. That is what the Bible teaches.

"either way taking the anti-Calvinist view , or the Biblical view , it all comes down to God's Sovereignty. "
The Biblical view is non-Calvinist as well. God's sovereignty doesn't equate to God choosing who will believe, which is the logical and obvious conclusion of the RT doctrine of election.

God chooses to save those who believe (1 Cor 1:21).

God does NOT choose who will believe, or the Bible would teach that.

If God chose who would believe, Paul's answer to the jailer was quite incorrect, and even disingenuous. He told (imperative=command) the jailer to believe on Christ and he WILL BE SAVED.

Why give such a command IF God chooses who will believe?

I would greatly appreciate an answer to this question. Thanks.

These are merely your opinions

I will stay with scripture :

2 Thes 2:13

But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:

I already explained the duality of purpose in the command , but you can only see your own limited view

Your last question reminds me of "why pray if God already knows what your going to say and need " ?


again scripture does support my STATEMENTS , NOT YOUR ASSERTIONS



John.3

[1] There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:
[2] The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.
[3] Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
[4] Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
[5] Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
[6] That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
[7] Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
[8] The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
[9] Nicodemus answered and said unto him, How can these things be?
[10] Jesus answered and said unto him, Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things?
[11] Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and testify that we have seen; and ye receive not our witness.
[12] If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?
[13] And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.
[14] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:
[15] That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
[16] For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
[17] For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
[18] He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
[19] And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
[20] For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
[21] But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
[22] After these things came Jesus and his disciples into the land of Judaea; and there he tarried with them, and baptized.
[23] And John also was baptizing in Aenon near to Salim, because there was much water there: and they came, and were baptized.
[24] For John was not yet cast into prison.
[25] Then there arose a question between some of John's disciples and the Jews about purifying.
[26] And they came unto John, and said unto him, Rabbi, he that was with thee beyond Jordan, to whom thou barest witness, behold, the same baptizeth, and all men come to him.
[27] John answered and said, A man can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven.
[28] Ye yourselves bear me witness, that I said, I am not the Christ, but that I am sent before him.
[29] He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.
[30] He must increase, but I must decrease.
[31] He that cometh from above is above all: he that is of the earth is earthly, and speaketh of the earth: he that cometh from heaven is above all.
[32] And what he hath seen and heard, that he testifieth; and no man receiveth his testimony.
[33] He that hath received his testimony hath set to his seal that God is true.
[34] For he whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God: for God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him.
[35] The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into his hand.
[36] He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

shturt678s

Regular Member
Dec 11, 2013
2,733
118
✟25,797.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
These are merely your opinions

I will stay with scripture :

2 Thes 2:13

But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:

I already explained the duality of purpose in the command , but you can only see your own limited view

Your last question reminds me of "why pray if God already knows what your going to say and need " ?

IIThess.2:13 Chosen in the act of sanctification and faith as well as Calvin's execution of the act, ie, hey, he at least got part of the passage's interpretation correct. :idea:

Old Jack
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Let's back up , again , do we admit that God knows and has always known every single person that will be saved ?

Does God know and has He always known every single person who shall not be saved ?

If He knows , then it is certain and cannot fall under the "might" "maybe" "perhaps" , such words describing a hypothetical salvation.

Then if God knows for certain who will be saved , then how can we speak of those who might have been , or deny the truth that some couldn't have been saved ?

Either God knew you would be saved , in which case how could you not be saved ?

Or God didn't know one way or another if you were going to be saved or not , in which case it may be correct in asserting you MIGHT have been saved or lost.
 
Upvote 0

shturt678s

Regular Member
Dec 11, 2013
2,733
118
✟25,797.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Why doesn't everyone believe then?

Those that have met the Truth of the Word and resist is due to being obdurate refusing God's gift of grace, ie, having a lack of an agape of the Truth sort of thing (IIThess.2:10b). :blush: God forenew allll, ie, He knows who would resist and be cast in the lake of fire forever, and who would be with Him forever. :amen:

Yet let's not go too far the other way with "free-will" as all have an "enslaved-will" thus grace cannot be rejected, ie, all happens by God's necessity. End point: Grace has always had it's limits,, eg, parables regarding the Kingdom of God that are more veiled than ever before. :confused:

Old Jack
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
These are merely your opinions
I see. You're rather not answer my question. Probably for good reason; the answers refute RT.

I will stay with scripture :

2 Thes 2:13

But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:
This verse refutes RT. It doesn't say that people are chosen to believe, but chosen for salvation through faith in the truth. iow, those who believe are chosen for salvation. Not too different than 1 Cor 1:21 - God is well pleased to save those who believe.

Your last question reminds me of "why pray if God already knows what your going to say and need " ?
Why won't you answer the question?

again scripture does support my STATEMENTS , NOT YOUR ASSERTIONS
I asked a question, which you have dodged. And my response to your comment here is what you began your post with: "these are merely your opinions".
 
Upvote 0