I don't like such labels, but honestly, "
What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." I think so. You can call it whatever you like, but the message that God's word puts forth will still shine through to any objective reader.
Mrk 11:13-14
- "And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet.
- And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard it."
Mark 11:20-21
- "And in the morning, as they passed by, they saw the fig tree dried up from the roots.
- And Peter calling to remembrance saith unto him, Master, behold, the fig tree which thou cursedst is withered away."
Matthew 21:42-44
- "Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
- Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
- And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder."
You can call it whatever you want, but the message God gives is clear. God's visible Kingdom or congregation upon earth up to this time was represented by the nation of Israel. But Christ is now
making it clear that that kingdom of God representation shall be taken from the Old Testament Congregation, the nation of Israel and given to a nation that will bring forth the fruits thereof. Namely, the New Testament Congregation that is the church would now hold that distinction. And let's be clear, these words are neither polysemous, subtle, abstruse or difficult. They're not subject to private interpretations or out of context revisions. The Messiah and Kingdom of Israel that prophesy foretold was rejected by His Own People, the Jews, and therefore they were cursed with blindness (
in part) to never bear fruit as a nation again, as they would no longer be the representatives of God's Kingdom on earth. Christ clearly taught that the Kingdom has been taken from them, and given to the church, who will bring forth the fruit of the Spirit, rather than the flesh. Jesus Christ, of course, reveals as the foundation stone of this restoration of the Kingdom of Christ. Again, use whatever word you choose, call it whatever you want, the Biblical facts of Scripture are without ambiguity concerning their judgment, what that concerned, and who are the children of God and who are not. For example,
anyone who rejects Christ, by definition
cannot be the children of the Kingdom.
Acts 4:10-12
- "Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.
- This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
- Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved."
Israel cannot be saved by still rejecting Christ, cannot be the kingdom, cannot be the children of God or the election. Neither is their salvation in any other person, place or thing. There is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. So while someone talks about "a miracle of the birth of a nation" that they also say could never have been un-birthed or not a nation in the first place, the Bible says differently. Biblical facts, versus visions and delusions of grandeur. You can call it Supersessionism, You can call it Restoration Theology, you can call it Replacement Theology, you can call it Antisemitism, but God calls it Biblical fact.
Selah.