- Aug 6, 2005
- 17,496
- 1,568
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Republican
Let me see here.
1. You CANNOT "prove" it from Scripture.
Never said that. What I said was that the CC is not Sola Scriptura. The CC uses both Scritpure and Tradition.
Here's your former position, as stated in # 68, "How ever the Dogma that is being questioned is mentioned by the Church fathers and is in Scripture.
Our friend WarriorAngel posted in # 91, "It's right there in Scripture!"
Now you seem to be saying that it's NOT in Scripture.
I disagree with you that the Catholic Denomination uses it's own Tradition AND Scripture. Here's a classic example of the real rubric of "My Tradition OR Scripture." Because, as you've noted, it's not using Scripture here - just it's own very late Tradition. OR not AND.
2. It's from the 4th Century - at the very, very earliest.
Moot. The first Scripture was inscribed about 1500 BC, the last about 90 AD - that makes Scripture 600 to 2100 years older than this rumor. The "compilation" of the Canon began in 1500 BC and was largely finished by 100 AD and entirely finished before ANY meeting of ANY denomination - certainly long before the Catholic Denomination officially embraced it in the 16th Century - some 3000 years after the first Scripture. But it's an entirely moot point.Same time that the Bible was compiled.
3. It doesn't come from Scripture, Mary, the Apostles, the earliest Catholic Denomination Fathers or the Early Church.
And the Bible does not come from any of those.
So, you admit that this rumor doesn't come from Scripture or Mary or any Apostle or any earliest Catholic Denominational "Fathers." We agree on that.
Thank you.
Pax
- Josiah
.
Upvote
0