Some wrong ideas about life

[JohnEmmett]

quote and reference a Bible verse that explicitly bans abortion

Precept 1. Refrain from taking life

Not killing any living being. For Buddhists…

 

[JohnEmmett]

Monks, the taking of life — when indulged in, developed, & pursued — is something that leads to hell, leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to the realm of the hungry shades.

Vipaka Sutta: Results

 

[GodLovesCats]

Precept 1. Refrain from taking life

Not killing any living being. For Buddhists…

I have no idea what you are talking about.

If you want to answer the question, go ahead, but that is obviously the opposite of an answer.

 

[JohnEmmett]

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Of course

 

[AV1611VET]

Tell me how a fetus with no brain who was conceived by rape is a gift from God.

No such thing.

 

[AV1611VET]

Exactly what I said: quote and reference a Bible verse that explicitly bans abortion after the book of Deuteronomy.

Now who's moving the goalpost?

I didn't say a word about banning abortion.

I simply said, "Abortion is murder."

That means the "banning" is implied, since murder is banned.

And why "after Deuteronomy"?

Can't it be "before Deuteronomy" or "in Deuteronomy"?

 

[GodLovesCats]

No such thing.

Read the story about the fetus with no brain who was conceived by rape. There obviously is such a thing.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Read the story about the fetus with no brain who was conceived by rape. There obviously is such a thing.

There is no such thing as… it’s fine (to kill) in this case


Sorry!

 

[AV1611VET]

Read the story about the fetus with no brain who was conceived by rape. There obviously is such a thing.

Does this answer your challenge?

Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,

 

[GodLovesCats]

Now who's moving the goalpost? I didn't say a word about banning abortion. I simply said, "Abortion is murder." That means the "banning" is implied, since murder is banned.

Murder is explicitly banned in Exodus 20.

And why "after Deuteronomy"? Can't it be "before Deuteronomy" or "in Deuteronomy"?

I clearly explained why: because most Jewish people, whose holy book is the first five books of the Bible (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy in that order), are pro-choice. If Jews don't think any verses in the Five Books of Moses ban abortion, Christians must use verses in books after them to prove God bans abortion.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Christians must use verses in books after them to prove God bans abortion.

Karma?

 

[GodLovesCats]

Does this answer your challenge?

Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: 17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,

There is no innocent blood in a woman's uterus. Innocence requires the ability to choose obedience or disobedience, which obviously does not exist before birth.

There is no blood in a zygote, blastocyst, or young embryo anyway.

 

[AV1611VET]

Read the story about the fetus with no brain who was conceived by rape. There obviously is such a thing.

What story about a fetus with no brain?

I googled it and got this:

Anencephaly is a serious birth defect in which a baby is born without parts of the brain and skull.

Is this what you're talking about?

 

[JohnEmmett]

Innocence requires …

in·no·cent
2. not responsible for or directly involved in an event yet suffering its consequences.

 

[AV1611VET]

I clearly explained why: because most Jewish people, whose holy book is the first five books of the Bible (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy in that order), are pro-choice. If Jews don't think any verses in the Five Books of Moses ban abortion, Christians must use verses in books after them to prove God bans abortion.

What kind of exegesis is this?

Since when do Christians align their doctrine in lockstep with Jewish doctrine?

Jews don't think Christ is God, despite the fact that He's all through the books of Moses.

Should we deny His deity as well?

 

[GodLovesCats]

There is no such thing as… it’s fine (to kill) in this case

There is no such thing as it is bad to abort in this specific case.

 

[AV1611VET]

There is no innocent blood in a woman's uterus. Innocence requires the ability to choose obedience or disobedience, which obviously does not exist before birth.

Got it.

Guilty until proven innocent ... right?

We're all born sinners, so let's just all line up to be aborted.

Don't just abort some -- abort them all.

 

[JohnEmmett]

There is no such thing as it is bad to abort in this specific case.

If you ignore all warnings

 

[GodLovesCats]

What kind of exegesis is this?

Since when do Christians align their doctrine in lockstep with Jewish doctrine?

Jews don't think Christ is God, despite the fact that He's all through the books of Moses.

Should we deny His deity as well?

Messianic Jews have something to say about this. Go to their forum.

 

[AV1611VET]

Messianic Jews have something to say about this. Go to their forum.

No thank you.

Abort is murder.

'Nuff said.