That means Goodyears were an ancestral characteristic and will be found on all wheels with 4 or 5 holes. Is this true?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you find wheels with 5 holes that have Goodyears then it simply means that 5 holes evolved from a Goodyears with four holes, completely in line with the nested hierarchy. We already discussed this.
Yep, I read those few days ago. Great explanation by PZ.There is a recent paper by Axe and company. The problem is that it never tests ID, nor does it really test evolution. PZ does a good job of explaining the problems here:
How not to examine the evolution of proteins : Pharyngula
How to examine the evolution of proteins : Pharyngula
But that's not what we find. Under my hypothetical rules, 18" and a chrome cap means five nut-holes will also be found on that wheel, without exception. Just like in nature, where having hair/fur and mammary glands means the animal will have three middle-ear bones.
In human-designed tires, we don't find such a rule, because they were designed. And designers are not constrained by a nested hierarchy. Evolution is.
Only if it's there. If it's not then it evolved, completely in line with the nested hierarchy.
Under the definition of fish, these are gill bearing aquatic vertebrates. Then you have lung-fish. Finding organisms with hair and four middle ear bones would be called -four-midear mammals. So either way works.
If we wanted we could call it a four-chrome cap.
We could also emulate the cessation of creation by choosing no vehicles after...say... umm....1950. This means we have a group of cars with certain 1950s and back technology and no 2011 technology (no exceptions), completely in line with the nested hiearchy.
Or it evolved from from a five holed, completely in line with the nested hierarchy.
Under the definition of fish, these are gill bearing aquatic vertebrates. Then you have lung-fish. Finding organisms with hair and four middle ear bones would be called -four-midear mammals. So either way works.
We could also emulate the cessation of creation by choosing no vehicles after...say... umm....1950. This means we have a group of cars with certain 1950s and back technology and no 2011 technology (no exceptions), completely in line with the nested hiearchy.
In Australia they probably would say G'new year.....That means Goodyears were an ancestral characteristic and will be found on all wheels with 4 or 5 holes. Is this true?
That gives me an idea for my halloween maskYes, that hits the nail .........on the head ROFLOL
That gives me an idea for my halloween mask
Search for 'Genesis 1:1' in the version
NKJV) Judges 4:21 Then Jael, Heber's wife, took a tent peg and took a hammer in her hand, and went softly to him and drove the peg into his temple,
and it went down into the ground; for he was fast asleep and weary. So he died.
my theory on the subject is there is no evolution only crossbreeding of different species and my two examples below is proof.
breed an ass with a horse and you get a mule
breed a scientist with an evolutionist and you get a smart donkey
Hahaaaaa.
Funny.
But Genesis DOES mention a cross breeding between two different Kinds of humans, which is ALSO mentioned by the Paleontologists:
Gen. 6:1 And it came to pass, when men, (hominoids), began, (during the sixth day, the Cenozoic Era of Geological Time), to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
Gen. 6:2 That (the hominoid line of mans ascent), the sons of God, (the Methusaelian Homo erectus who were to lead to the completed "Adam's" genetic progeny), saw the daughters of (other humanoid) men, (Lamechian Homo antecessors), that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
Genesis 6: Sons of God
To call that a stretch would be an insult to all things stretchy.
Hmmm....
Recent science confirms that we all have Neanderthal genes.
In fact, the paleontologists say that hybrids between us and other species of men took place.
Check out the whole argument:
The text of Genesis 5 compared to the present paleonotology.
I worked in a Junk Yard once. We had to learn the rims based on the company that made them. So we grouped Ford Rims together. That made it a lot easier to find when someone was looking for a Rim for their Ford. Then we would divide them in that group according to their size. At the time they were mostly 14 & 15 inches in size.Because you're just grouping them, not placing them into any kind of hierarchy.
I worked in a Junk Yard once. We had to learn the rims based on the company that made them. So we grouped Ford Rims together. That made it a lot easier to find when someone was looking for a Rim for their Ford. Then we would divide them in that group according to their size. At the time they were mostly 14 & 15 inches in size.
I accept your fact, but I reject your theory.
In some creation beliefs, the world was masturbated into existence. Obviously this is an allegory to the necessity of water for carbon based life. Ergo belief systems that say the world was masturbated into existence are scientifically accurate.
Yes that is all true.
However the only creation story reaching us from 3362 years ago that still conforms with the facts we now know is Genesis.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?