I'm not going to make this an actual reply, since the OP apparently isn't interested in discussion. It's just a thought problem I'm interested in working on.
In physical reality, interdependent systems are material. And anything material that didn't exist at the time of universe's birth can arise only by rearrangements of matter. As such rearrangements are constrained by computational capacity of the universe they are insufficient for arranging matter into system that fits an interdependent system. In other words, the number of matter arrangements that won't functionally fit an interdependent system is way above the number of matter arrangements that are generated since the universe's birth 15 billion years ago.
The computational capacity of the universe. There appears to be no known basis in reality for this concept, but for the sake of argument, let's entertain the notion, since I'm a science fiction fan. So nature is incapable of arranging matter into anything more complex than what, a snowflake? Or maybe God designed snowflakes. The problem here is that if I point to any complex natural structure, I could conclude that it was designed and created by God, so it's not really natural. Maybe nature isn't capable of producing anything beyond simple molecules.
However, if we're going to use the scientific method, then we need to try to find purely natural explanations for things. We might fail, if the supernatural was actually involved, but we still make the attempt. We see complex, interdependent things in nature. Earth's weather system, for example. It's dynamic, very complex, and involves the Sun and Moon. What universe computational capacity does a hurricane need to form?
We can safely rule out the computation capacity of the universe.
Also, interdependent systems must be logically linked to one another. Nature lacks causality for such linking. So it is physically impossible to arrange matter into interdependent state. You can't just wave a magic wand of just so story and make this impossibility disappear. So, nobody cares about what "the real theory of evolution" has to say about how interdependent systems arise because this theory inherently negates physical reality.
Causality for linking interdependent biologic systems. Again, there is no basis for declaring that nature lacks a causality for such linking, but that's not really important anyway. The systems were linked in the first place. Maintaining the link is a role of evolution. In the case of male and female, better ability to mate is selected for. Reduced ability to mate is selected against.
Well, there are also symbiotic relationships between different species. But I don't think the OP was concerned about those, so I won't bother doing the research, since I don't actually like biology all that much.
