• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Some random discussion on evolution...

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
No you can't. Your detection of design in this instance is merely equivocation over the words "gears" and "motors"

again: why the gears i showed here arent real gears? i think that this is the problem with your position and why you reject id.
 
Upvote 0

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟344,333.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
again: why the gears i showed here arent real gears? i think that this is the problem with your position and why you reject id.

Labeling something is not a design detection method.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
so you dont see design here?:

1.jpg


i think that many people will disagree.

(image from White Plastic Gears Loop Stock Footage Video (100% Royalty-free) 3054055 | Shutterstock)
Not because they are gears, but because they appear to be made of molded plastic, which would be evidence of design if that appearance proved to be correct. Just being gears is not, in itself, evidence of design.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
again: why the gears i showed here arent real gears? i think that this is the problem with your position and why you reject id.
They are real gears, but that is not evidence that they were designed.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
so if we can detect design according to your criteria? give me your main criteria.
Evidence of intentional manufacture; mold lines, tool marks, use of refined or non-natural materials, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
tell it to others here. it seems that they dont think so.
Everybody here thinks they are real gears, it's just that nobody but you thinks that means they must have been designed.
 
Upvote 0

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟344,333.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
so if we can detect design according to your criteria? give me your main criteria.

Design detection is typically based on pre-existing knowledge of how things are created.

If you can explain how things in biology were designed, then you might be able to start developing a criteria for detecting them.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
irrelevant. id is only about the abillity to detect design in nature. nothing more. and we indeed can detect design in nature as we seen with gears and spinning motors.

So you assume that gears=design, and thus you conclude that gears in nature must have been designed. And since you have concluded that they were designed, you use that as proof that you were correct when you first assumed that gears=design.

Do you even understand what circular logic is?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Jimmy D
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So you assume that gears=design, and thus you conclude that gears in nature must have been designed. And since you have concluded that they were designed, you use that as proof that you were correct when you first assumed that gears=design.

Do you even understand what circular logic is?
Except...gears are designed obviously. last time you found several in sync gears in your rock garden?
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Rock gardens are designed, too.

Great. But some peole could get confuse dand claim nature made the rocks in that formation or whatever. If several in sync gears are in the garden, there is no doubt.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Great. But some peole could get confuse dand claim nature made the rocks in that formation or whatever. If several in sync gears are in the garden, there is no doubt.
And if nature made the rocks, they still could have been designed. That's the nature of the design hypothesis--it's unfalsifiable. I can claim the rocks were designed and you can never prove me wrong.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Kylie
Upvote 0

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Design detection is typically based on pre-existing knowledge of how things are created.
so take a look at this ufo photo:

220px-PurportedUFO2.jpg


say that that object is real for the sake of the argument. can you say why you conclude design?

(image from wiki)
 
Upvote 0