• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Some harmful side effects of free will.

Cormack

“I bet you're a real hulk on the internet...”
Apr 21, 2020
1,469
1,408
London
✟102,307.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Why a loaded question on a topic I couldn't care less about.

Loaded, in what sense? I’m asking if you agree with a particular position, but you’re acting so timid you won’t even answer.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Loaded, in what sense? I’m asking if you agree with a particular position, but you’re acting so timid you won’t even answer.
Does my position agree? If not, I don't plan to change it.
 
Upvote 0

Cormack

“I bet you're a real hulk on the internet...”
Apr 21, 2020
1,469
1,408
London
✟102,307.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Does my position agree? If not, I don't plan to change it.

All you have to do is read the quote, assess your own beliefs in light of the quote, and then answer my question. Honestly Dave, this is a shameful display of question dodging.
 
Reactions: John Mullally
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
All you have to do is read the quote, assess your own beliefs in light of the quote, and then answer my question. Honestly Dave, this is a shameful display of question dodging.
I tell you the truth and let you decide. Isn't that best?
 
Upvote 0

chilehed

Veteran
Jul 31, 2003
4,732
1,399
64
Michigan
✟250,124.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Grace does not depend on free will.
No one's ever said otherwise. Quite the opposite: due to the effects of Original Sin, my will can be truly free only by the grace of God. And he does give us that grace.

Law does. You destroy grace and the gospel when you mix in free will.
I don't know how it is that you came up with such absurd ideas, but it appears that you don't know the meanings of all of the words you're using.
 
Upvote 0

A_Thinker

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2004
11,915
9,069
Midwest
✟979,176.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Law works because it is based on free will. Run a stop sign and get fined. Why? Because you were free to obey the law. You turn grace into law when you drag free will into the mix. Why? Because grace saves apart from law.
Do the saved not have the option to run a stop sign ?

If free-will does not exist under the umbrella of grace, ... then why are christians urged to confess their sins, ... and thus, receive God's forgiveness ?
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You are correct. The new birth (salvation) happens before the will can be free. And then only to do righteousness. If we sin it has a saving effect through God's chastisement and our repentance.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It can't, but that means that the Law is 'part' of free will, not the other way round.
You reap what you sow. Laws of cause and effect prove you need to reconsider your position.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Free will depends on the law. How can law exist apart from it?
Actually, life itself depends on free choice. The law has nothing to do with it. The law is just part of life, at least for Jews.

Romans 2:14,15 proves that free will is limited to law. God created everyone with a conscience. And that is where freedom to choose is found; the conscience.
 
Upvote 0

Silly Uncle Wayne

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,332
598
58
Dublin
✟110,146.00
Country
Ireland
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
You reap what you sow. Laws of cause and effect prove you need to reconsider your position.
When you leave your house to go for a walk you can choose to turn left or choose to turn right or cross or go straight ahead. None of those are accounted for in the Law.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
When you leave your house to go for a walk you can choose to turn left or choose to turn right or cross or go straight ahead. None of those are accounted for in the Law.
They are based on natural law. Why turn if you don't think the laws of physics will fail in getting you to your destination? The Law and the gospel are far different, but people unwittingly blend them. Wicked people need the law to keep God from killing them. Grace instead gives a new heart to those God chooses to save so that they keep the law by nature in their hearts. They hate sin and prefer righteousness. Everything the law upholds.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sorry, I don’t think that is supported well by the Bible.
We died spiritually and cannot discern spiritual truth. Unless born again we worship only idols.
Before the New Birth;

“Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

After the New Birth;

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.” Galatians 5:19–23 (KJV 1900)
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
How can you be right when faith is a fruit of the Holy Spirit?
The "faith" in the list of characteristics in Gal 5 is a characteristic itself. So, it means "faithfulness". Certainly not "saving faith".
 
Reactions: Cormack
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,878
3,304
67
Denver CO
✟239,973.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It's perfectly understandable that there are labels for differing interpretations or doctrines. Unfortunately, there may also exist misinterpretations and even misrepresentations in those doctrines or about those doctrines. For example, I have no idea if what you have described as compatibilism is part of Calvinism. I'm sure you'll understand what I mean when I say that we all need to know Jesus and experience the Spirit of Christ firsthand, and to that end, the Holy Spirit has been provided to be our guide and teacher.

Therefore I also think you will also believe me when I say that my aversion to discussing the subject of Calvinism or Augustinism comes from understanding the sentiments expressed here: "Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment". 11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you. 12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. 13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

I'm sorry if you've been disappointed by any disinterest in discourse. As for me, I felt I had sufficiently discussed God confronting Cain and it's meaning in post #68. There I pointed out why scripture shows that Cain did not deliberately offer a bad sacrifice, and that he probably didn't fully understand the point of the offering. I'd be happy to discuss the matter further.

With some humility I would like to say that I am a student of linguistics. As such I see words as vehicles of sentiment. I find that in the moral/immoral purview, any reasoning based on something false will end in a contradiction because it violates seeing others and loving others as myself.

For the sake of clarity, I have objectively pointed out the semantics occurring in scripture regarding the descriptive term 'free' manifesting in two subjective views of servitude to opposing masters. The main point being that the sentiment of being free is a deception in one of them, wherefore it ends in a contradiction of reasoning. Since God defines the good, whatever reasoning is governed by the knowledge of God is the only true free will. Hence faith is the necessary item, esteeming God as good and therefore trustworthy.

Having said that, there is that which is commonly described as a free will, wherein the term 'free' being discussed, is an equivocation between the two Masters, which for all intensive purposes I view as futile/vanity since one cannot serve two masters as a matter of circumstance. This can be corroborated by evidence in semantics that reveals that divisions produce polarization rather than manifesting in a random dispersal of individuality. Because the equivocating definition of free will is based on vanity, it too produces contradictions when reasoned upon, because it is a state of being doubleminded and therefore manifests hypocritical judgment.

I have come to understand that True worship is drawn out by the object of worship and is not the product of one's discretion. Wherefore to Love God with all your heart mind and soul, should not be counted as a prerogative, but seen as a byproduct of knowing Him.


I assume you realize that under the definition of free will as an equivocation, Cain must contrarily be fully capable of choosing wickedness and fully capable of choosing righteousness, when in reality he can only do one or the other in any given situation. As such I view the fact that God says Cain should exercise dominion over sin as unequivocal. So the question is why does Cain inwardly end up discounting or maybe even despising God's counsel? I don't find the teaching that it's Cain's free will to despise/discount God's Word to be a sufficient answer. I don't believe a free will can be based on the ignorance that allows sin to be be pondered as a viable alternative to God, which would to me be vanity. The issue as I see it is understanding the necessity of faith/trust in God as a prerequisite for obedience. After all it's not reasonable that God can be counted as both trustworthy and untrustworthy at the same time. Truth is authoritative not subjective, wherefore God's Character does not become trustworthy or untrustworthy according to our will.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

RickReads

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2020
3,433
1,068
60
richmond
✟72,331.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced

I almost do.
 
Upvote 0