So I keep evolving perfectly, and all the feminine are attracted to me? Why?

[Gottservant]

Because intelligence is a measurable attribute of an individual and evolution is not.



Exactly. It isn't measured or managed meaningfully on an individual level.

Yes. It doesn't apply to an individual scale or timescale.

I find that distressing.

 

[Shemjaza]

Which is it: the statistic or the whole, that affects adaptation? I don't think you've specified either?

No, it's the adaption that affects the population statistically.

The presence of a beneficial adaptation will lead to the individuals with the advantage having an advantage on a statistical level... that doesn't mean that all of them will benefit, just that their odds are slightly better.

Over the long term this will lead to a greater percentage of the population having that advantage, possibly the entire population.

Again, is the individual a member of the species, or is the species a number of individuals? The lack of subtext in Evolution, is making this hard to determine?

It's absolutely both.

As an example.

If I cut down a single tree, I haven't cut down the whole forest.

 

[Gottservant]

Don't you get it? My commodity is time...?

I am an average bloke and I can keep a fraction of that time dedicated to doing what Evolution does for you and me both.

If you came to me and said "what do you believe?", I would say
"Keep these words: "What I say to you, I say to everyone "Watch!" for the miracles that were possible to Jesus are possible to you and greater" - I'm not going to make you twice the son of hell as myself, all I know to believe is that it is worth telling people to "watch": if it was good enough for Jesus, it is good enough for you and me both.

I keep saying it, "Watch" - in this context: for you and me both!

 

[Gottservant]

No, it's the adaption that affects the population statistically.

Because it is adaptively statistical, it is selected? Or its adaptively popular? You are using these terms interchangeably?

The presence of a beneficial adaptation will lead to the individuals with the advantage having an advantage on a statistical level... that doesn't mean that all of them will benefit, just that their odds are slightly better.

But if something is resurrected, it may go on to be more successful than it ever was in its previous life?

Over the long term this will lead to a greater percentage of the population having that advantage, possibly the entire population.

Over time resurrection would become more likely, or a specific adaptation's associations?

It's absolutely both.

As an example.

If I cut down a single tree, I haven't cut down the whole forest.

Even if you cut down a single tree, the soul of the single tree lives with the forest (through the trees that are remaining).

Are you saying nothing can be evolved in the memory of a tree or that trees don't remember each other because they evolve?

 

[Shemjaza]

Don't you get it? My commodity is time...?

I am an average bloke and I can keep a fraction of that time dedicated to doing what Evolution does for you and me both.

If you came to me and said "what do you believe?", I would say
"Keep these words: "What I say to you, I say to everyone "Watch!" for the miracles that were possible to Jesus are possible to you and greater" - I'm not going to make you twice the son of hell as myself, all I know to believe is that it is worth telling people to "watch": if it was good enough for Jesus, it is good enough for you and me both.

I keep saying it, "Watch" - in this context: for you and me both!

And none of that is relevant to evolution.


You don't need to understand evolution... but you clearly spend a lot of time and thought on it, except you have been unable to understand even the most basic facts about it.

I would recommend you forget all about it and concentrate on things that make you happier and more content in the world.

Because it is adaptively statistical, it is selected? Or its adaptively popular? You are using these terms interchangeably?

No, I'm not using those terms interchangeably.

The adaptation is an aspect of individuals that give them an advantage to surviving and reproducing.

Because of that advantage, more of the next generation with the adaptation will thrive. That is what I mean by a statistical advantage.

But if something is resurrected, it may go on to be more successful than it ever was in its previous life?

Unless resurrection is some kind of inherited trait, then it isn't relevant to evolution.

Over time resurrection would become more likely, or a specific adaptation's associations?

Unless resurrection is some kind of inherited trait, then it isn't relevant to evolution.

Even if you cut down a single tree, the soul of the single tree lives with the forest (through the trees that are remaining).

No, I'm saying that despite a forest being made of trees, a forest is not a tree. And action to a single tree isn't meaningful action against a forest.

Are you saying nothing can be evolved in the memory of a tree or that trees don't remember each other because they evolve?

I'm not saying that.

 

[Gottservant]

Scientifically then, what happens when Evolution goes "full circle"?

What is the phenomena?

You know, like scientists study at CERN, with atoms going full circle...

 

[Gottservant]

[...]
Unless resurrection is some kind of inherited trait, then it isn't relevant to evolution.
[...]

Resurrection is a resurrection of "heritability".

Everything that was previously learned, can be learned again more readily (than before).

It is an acceleration of everything believed to be advantageous, about heritance - that is before death is able to prohibit certain adaptations.

 

[Shemjaza]

Scientifically then, what happens when Evolution goes "full circle"?

What is the phenomena?

You know, like scientists study at CERN, with atoms going full circle...

That's not a meaningful question.

Evolution is a continuous process for as long as reproduction with variation continues.

When reproduction ends, so does evolution.

Resurrection is a resurrection of "heritability".

Everything that was previously learned, can be learned again more readily (than before).

It is an acceleration of everything believed to be advantageous, about heritance - that is before death is able to prohibit certain adaptations.

Unless it's relevant to some inheritable traits, then it isn't relevant to evolution.

In this scenario, what is causing this resurrection?

 

[SkyWriting]

Hi there,

So I just thought, you know what "what we have been avoiding, is what it means to evolve perfectly, by repeatedly returning to Jesus"?

In concrete terms, does it mean that the feminine will be attracted to me? In the expectation that I will be able to lead them, into greater Evolution?

I mean think about it, you don't keep mutating, if you are getting the selection pressure response "perfect", do you?

Or you would argue you "can't" because "no one can"? Even though we have Jesus - seems a little disingenuous?

It's not like the feminine will cut me off, if I have what they needed? You would have all kinds of expectation, if you could perfect it consistently? I would have "Evolution to spare"?

If I could give you another angle, I would, but as you may have guessed, I am not that affected by the possibility of Evolution, so much as the proper practice encouraged on the basis that it is verifiable?

I would like for you to be able to evolve perfectly, I am not proposing that your evolved countenance has been outed, by greater - I am suggesting we may be able to move beyond "outing" in general?

Tell me what you think.

Natural selection is all the ladies who seek other men.

 

[Homeowner]

Natural selection is all the ladies who seek other men.

Although after all the generations of natural selection we still have these kinds of threads makes you wonder if the evolution is all it is cracked up to be.

 

[SkyWriting]

Although after all the generations of natural selection we still have these kinds of threads makes you wonder if the evolution is all it is cracked up to be.

All religions are education in nature and held in place with sacred texts and regular associations with like minded peers. They just follow the rules of influence.

The 7 basic principles of persuasion were devised by Dr. Robert Cialdini and include: scarcity, authority, social proof, sympathy, reciprocity, consistency and later unity was added.

But that's also true for public education.

 

[SkyWriting]

Although after all the generations of natural selection we still have these kinds of threads makes you wonder if the evolution is all it is cracked up to be.

You have a good point.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

but two is more than one.

??

Yet there is no such thing as being 'more evolved'.

 

[Gottservant]

In this scenario, what is causing this resurrection?

Rebirth of spirit.

Conscious substantiation, of a resonant soul (becoming hyper-resonant).

The reverberation of the Word of God, syncopating a renewed grasp of life - being open to receiving a new body.

You could come at it scientifically and say "life force, reconfiguring a stronger energy, on the basis of attenuation to the possibility, that a single expression of being is not an effective limitation (to objections against, on the basis of infidelity)"

The rebirth comes from God, and is given life by the Holy Spirit (thus passing through the Son of God, and empowering Him by Wisdom).

 

[Shemjaza]

Rebirth of spirit.

Conscious substantiation, of a resonant soul (becoming hyper-resonant).

The reverberation of the Word of God, syncopating a renewed grasp of life - being open to receiving a new body.

You could come at it scientifically and say "life force, reconfiguring a stronger energy, on the basis of attenuation to the possibility, that a single expression of being is not an effective limitation (to objections against, on the basis of infidelity)"

The rebirth comes from God, and is given life by the Holy Spirit (thus passing through the Son of God, and empowering Him by Wisdom).

This phrase:
"life force, reconfiguring a stronger energy, on the basis of attenuation to the possibility, that a single expression of being is not an effective limitation (to objections against, on the basis of infidelity)"
is not scientific. None of the terms are defined and don't appear make any sense.

This means your resurrection idea is meaningless to evolution unless it causes an effect on a species level.

 

[Gottservant]

I have worked out "why": females have an excess of available 'design'; in seeking a mate, they (females of my species) are trying to find the best fit, for the added design in their womb.

If females find a best fit for their womb, the odds of the survival of the young, are dramatically increased.

This puts a downward pressure, on the male's ability to stray from the completion of the design, that is in him.

The young then, are able to grow their own variation of design, that is best suited to the instinct, that their parents confer.

In other words, the parents conferring instinct by design, have greater of both (instinct and design).

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I have worked out "why": females have an excess of available 'design'; in seeking a mate, they (females of my species) are trying to find the best fit, for the added design in their womb.

If females find a best fit for their womb, the odds of the survival of the young, are dramatically increased.

This puts a downward pressure, on the male's ability to stray from the completion of the design, that is in him.

The young then, are able to grow their own variation of design, that is best suited to the instinct, that their parents confer.

In other words, the parents conferring instinct by design, have greater of both (instinct and design).

No, that's not how evolution works, as you have been told repeatedly.

 

[Gottservant]

No, that's not how evolution works, as you have been told repeatedly.

You say macro-Evolution is as real as micro-Evolution, what about the macro-Evolution of micro-Evolution?

Please.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You say macro-Evolution is as real as micro-Evolution, what about the macro-Evolution of micro-Evolution?

Please.

Micro-evolution leads to macro-evolution. Lots of small steps combined together reach a destination.

 

[Gottservant]

Micro-evolution leads to macro-evolution. Lots of small steps combined together reach a destination.

No, tell me what stages of micro-Evolution there are...

.. tell me, where are the stages of micro-Evolution becoming something differently micro-Evolution?

You are making an error of parallax?