So I keep evolving perfectly, and all the feminine are attracted to me? Why?

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

There is no subjective?

Wow, you really try to dictate everything.

That is 100% not what I said and you know it.

Perfection is a subjective term that is not found in evolutionary theory or biology because there is no such thing in this world as perfect.

 

[Mr Laurier]

You are saying females can't be attracted to my perfection?

They can be attracted to my Evolution, but not my perfection, in the same context?

What is your perfection?


Evolution is a PROCESS.

 

[tas8831]

Pretty certain no 'feminine' are attracted to you.

 

[Ophiolite]

Pretty certain no 'feminine' are attracted to you.

That's a bit harsh and probably inaccurate (statistically).

 

[tas8831]

That's a bit harsh and probably inaccurate (statistically).

I suppose so - there are 'feminine' that have pity-crushes and the like.

 

[Gottservant]

No seriously.

Lack of wisdom teeth is supposed to be a recent evolution.

Am I supposed to say "hey babe! Want to date a guy without wisdom teeth?"

Like because you believe in Evolution, you will back me up, right?

 

[jacks]

hey babe! Want to date a guy without wisdom teeth?

That is the best opening line I've ever heard!
BTW don't worry about evolving, God loves us how we are.

 

[Shemjaza]

No seriously.

Lack of wisdom teeth is supposed to be a recent evolution.

Am I supposed to say "hey babe! Want to date a guy without wisdom teeth?"

Like because you believe in Evolution, you will back me up, right?

A lack of wisdom teeth is not a trait that leads to sexual selection, it does make you less likely to suffer from the injuries and infections that wisdom teeth bring, so your health is likely improved over your life, which has a lot of advantages.

 

[Larniavc]

Evolution involves a loss of information,

What units are you measuring that loss in?

 

[AV1611VET]

What units are you measuring that loss in?

gene functions

 

[Shemjaza]

gene functions

Can you present an objective measure for that?

 

[AV1611VET]

Can you present an objective measure for that?

No.

 

[Shemjaza]

No.

Then I'm at a loss as to why you would suggest it.

I've interpreted that the possibility or impossibility of evolution was completely irrelevant to you.

 

[AV1611VET]

Then I'm at a loss as to why you would suggest it.

You've never heard that before?

 

[Larniavc]

gene functions

There is no such unit a gene functions. My point is that there are several standard units proposed for measuring information. Which one are you using here?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

No seriously.

Lack of wisdom teeth is supposed to be a recent evolution.

Am I supposed to say "hey babe! Want to date a guy without wisdom teeth?"

Like because you believe in Evolution, you will back me up, right?

No.

 

[Shemjaza]

You've never heard that before?

Typically from ID fans who care about pretending that science already agrees with them.

You're usually more of a "Phtth. What, Me worry?" as a response to scientific evidence disagreeing with you.

 

[AV1611VET]

Typically from ID fans who care about pretending that science already agrees with them.

For the record, I'm not a cdesign proponentsist.

You're usually more of a "Phtth. What, Me worry?" as a response to scientific evidence disagreeing with you.

I have no qualms explaining my position simply and in detail:

1. Bible says x, Science says x = go with x
2. Bible says x, Science says y = go with x
3. Bible says x, Science says ø = go with x
4. Bible says ø, Science says x = go with x
5. Bible says ø, Science says ø = free to speculate on your own

Prime Directive: Under no circumstances whatsoever is the Bible to be contradicted.

People should know exactly where I stand on most any given issue.

 

[Shemjaza]

For the record, I'm not a cdesign proponentsist.I have no qualms explaining my position simply and in detail:

1. Bible says x, Science says x = go with x
2. Bible says x, Science says y = go with x
3. Bible says x, Science says ø = go with x
4. Bible says ø, Science says x = go with x
5. Bible says ø, Science says ø = free to speculate on your own

Prime Directive: Under no circumstances whatsoever is the Bible to be contradicted.

People should know exactly where I stand on most any given issue.

The whole "Evolution/mutation only loses information" falls cleanly into the "4. Bible says ø, Science says x = go with x" category.

The consequences of the evidence might violate the Prime Directive... but the point itself doesn't appear to be particularly relevant to any detail of the Bible.

 

[Gottservant]

A lack of wisdom teeth is not a trait that leads to sexual selection, it does make you less likely to suffer from the injuries and infections that wisdom teeth bring, so your health is likely improved over your life, which has a lot of advantages.

No but seriously, if it comes down to who will be a potential partners mate, you will give me center stage because I am more adapted than you?

You realise this destroys the notion of the Nash Equilibrium?

I'm not trying to corner you, maybe Evolution isn't something that develops out of a partnership? Like the entire species would have to put people like me first, before we would see wisdom teeth removed? You would do that? Even if you have wisdom teeth?