If we are not above what you call "ignorant assumptions", are you going to beat us up to make us understand? (Yes, sarcastic, but where does the physical force end?)
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If we are not above what you call "ignorant assumptions", are you going to beat us up to make us understand? (Yes, sarcastic, but where does the physical force end?)
Cerberus~ said:My mom didn't spank me for the first 6 years of my life. In first grade, I was Brat Numero Uno. Fortunately my parents divorced and my step father (a Marine) wasn't into the "Ophra" parenting style and kicked my ass. I've seen violence, and the occasional swat on the ass isn't it.
I smoke pot, and I curse like a sailor.....
...And I could have little brat minding in 20 minutes.
"let's to go to bed honey"
"Screw you, mommy!"
"hun, let's to bed now, or I'm gonna make you go to bed"
"Shove it up your ass, mommy!"
Spank em, carry them to bed, and let them cry it out. If they come back of their room, spank them, and take them back to bed. Eventually, they'll stop coming out when their ass starts hurting enough...
...It's simple.
Cerberus~ said:Well I wasn't before, I now I'm starting to think it might do you a world of good...
I clearly stated in my post the appropriate time for spanking a child.
Chrystabelle said:Is a light slap on the face child abuse?
christalee4 said:Do you see any connection between the above and this:
No, I see no connection between the 2, Dr Phil. Please, enlighten me.
This should be interesting.
I am sorry that your stepfather mistreated you.
Honestly, I'm not. I mean there are better ways of getting the results that he got, ways that I would have prefered more, but hey, I like who I am today. And a big reason I am who I am is because of my stepdad.
Mistreatment does not make someone "tough" or "straighten" them out.
Sure it does.
It makes them angry, resentful and teaches them to be less patient.
That's true to an extent. There was a time when I was all of those things. I even learned some patience.
The above scenario portrays something that Michael and Debbie Pearl, the couple whose No Greater Joy website advocates repeated spanking (with an instrument) until the child is broken, or as you say, "when their ass starts hurting enough".
There's no need to use an instrument. A hand is sufficient.
It's angry and denotes that there is some kind of war going on between the parent and child, that the parent must wage with full force until he subdues the child.
1. It should never be done in anger. But if the kid is telling you to p*ss off, then having him sit in corner for 10 minutes isn't going to work, because he isn't going to do it, because if he did, he would be listening, thus nullifying having to spank him in the first place!
2. Sometimes it is a war. When the kid will not behave, will not listen, does what they please, then that kid is going to make it a war when you make him obey.
3. Full force is punching a kid like you would a dude who touched your wife's breasts.
Ya know, I don't think ya'll could be exagerating about this any more than you already are.
spinto said:I totally disagree with the "we don't spank" mentality. I can pick these kids out of a crowd... These are the ones screaming and running around the resturant, while Mommy threatens to count to 3.
Small children are EGOSENTRIC. This means they cannot be reasoned with on the level you think they should be reasoning at. They're little minds are just not there yet. Sometimes they need a little pop on the butt, and that it brings their attention back to you... Then, you can make them understand why they are not to do whatever it was they did wrong. And then you need stick to it. As they get older you won't need to spank because you will then be able to appeal to their maturing ablity to understand how their actions effect the world around them--outside of their direct perspective.
To me, when you try to reason, "aka" bargin, with small children. All you are doing is teaching them to how manipulate you. And that is truely counter productive.
I never feel children should be beaten... But spanking it neccesary in most cases it seems to me. And it varies. Some kids need a lighter touch than others.
Gomez said:"let's to go to bed honey"
"Screw you, mommy!"
"hun, let's to bed now, or I'm gonna make you go to bed"
"Shove it up your ass, mommy!"
Spank em, carry them to bed, and let them cry it out. If they come back of their room, spank them, and take them back to bed. Eventually, they'll stop coming out when their ass starts hurting enough.
It's simple.
I agree with Cerberus. Some kids don't need to be spanked, but there are kids that try to walk all over their parents because they know they can get away with it. Those are the kids that can use a spanking(by spanking I don't mean kick the crap out of them).
You don't beat the child in public, and make it worse.
You don't beat the child at all.
If your child is saying, "Screw you mommy," and "shove it up your *** Mommy" ... they learned it from you, and again - you are the one who needs the spanking, not the child.
I am convinced that threatening helpless beings with things they are afraid of is not a good idea.KalEl76 said:I've only used hot sauce on my son twice in his five years of existence, and both times the amount of hot sauce was the amount on my fingertip. I put it on his tounge. Since then, I just threaten him with it, not actually do it. He's afraid of the hot sauce technique.
I think the term "child abuse" has a pretty clear definition, and I do not really like the idea of broadening the meaning of such terms - it leads to undifferenciated equivocations.Chrystabelle said:Is a light slap on the face child abuse?
This is an example for what I consider respectless communication, and it is an example for a way of communicating that I don´t want children to learn. That´s why I would try my best not to talk that way, neither to adults nor to children.Cerberus~ said:What's wrong with you? Why are you so dense as to not understand the vast difference between beating and spanking?
Cerberus~ said:Honestly, I'm not. I mean there are better ways of getting the results that he got, ways that I would have prefered more, but hey, I like who I am today. And a big reason I am who I am is because of my stepdad.
Patience for what - for when you could grow up and give it back to your stepfather?That's true to an extent. There was a time when I was all of those things. I even learned some patience.
1. It should never be done in anger. But if the kid is telling you to p*ss off, then having him sit in corner for 10 minutes isn't going to work, because he isn't going to do it, because if he did, he would be listening, thus nullifying having to spank him in the first place!
2. Sometimes it is a war. When the kid will not behave, will not listen, does what they please, then that kid is going to make it a war when you make him obey.
Hmmmmmm. You do know kids learn cuss words at school and from hearing other people in public swear? Not everything is learned from the parents. Maybe you should be spanked for making huge generalizations?TexasSky said:If your child is saying, "Screw you mommy," and "shove it up your *** Mommy" ... they learned it from you, and again - you are the one who needs the spanking, not the child.
christalee4 said:Here's my Dr. Phil moment, since you've asked me. "Cerebus: perhaps you are angry at your mother, who never spanked you, for not sticking up for you when your stepfather beat you. Which is why you categorize people who don't spank as wusses. Which is why you seem to be an angry, hostile person." End of Dr. Phil moment.
quatona said:I am convinced that threatening helpless beings with things they are afraid of is not a good idea.
This is conditioning, not education.
It is counterproductive to what I would like children to understand and learn.
Considering that children (and humans in general) learn social behaviour by modeling others´ behaviour (as opposed to what people say), it teaches them that threatening physically weaker persons with frightening physical actions is a good idea (those who claim to be their models, and want to be acknowledged as such, do it, after all).
I don´t want to teach this standard to children.
Ymmv