The Eucharist can be celebrated with juice in lieu of wine.
Actually....no it can't. (See definitions for Sacramental Wine in Canon Law and various other threads)
That being said, the entirety of the body blood soul and divinity of Jesus is present in both the bread and wine species, and one is not obliged to partake of both to complete communion. In fact, for most of modern history, only the priest took the wine, and the layity were given only the one species. In the Eastern church, the two are mixed, so it may be difficult to avoid in that circumstance of the Divine Liturgy. But.....I'm sure an EO or Eastern Catholic can let us know if they have an alternative for their layity. At the Divine Liturgies I have attended, intinction was used. But back to the main point......
Prohibition doesn't work. If one is an alcoholic, and doesn't have a spiritual change. (see AA, 12 steps etc.), they'll still drink. Heroin has been illegal my entire lifetime, and I think there are still plenty of addicts. Addiction is a personal spiritual problem, It is not a problem to be solved by law. We'd just have wall to wall prisons. The evils that come from over consumption are evils committed by the person, not the material. Alcohol is a good.
It is better that individuals with a difficulty abstain from it's use personally, than to impose an impossible law on the general public. Right?
Having said THAT, as a law abiding person, if prohibition returned, I would not drink alcohol as an obedient citizen. But that would be because of grace and virtue, and obedience. Not because of the law itself. I don't refrain from murder because it is illegal. I refrain from murder because it is morally repugnant, and wrong. I think we're all okay that it IS illegal. But that law is based on a commandment from God, and natural law. Restraint from alcohol is not a commandment from God or natural law. Only temperance.