I realise that what I wrote may seem negative & may cause fear in some people. This of course is not my aim, rather it is to inform people so that hopefully it will make a difference, help people & reduce the enemy's influence.
I have a little difficulty keeping up with your thinking & typing - I still have to look at the keyboard. But it seems to me one your earlier points was that it is only when people believe the curse that it causes a problem.
We have some different views here. We must be due for another stouch on the forum
I agree that fear associated with these things gives them a greater authority & impact. I also agree with the scripture that says "Like a fluttering sparrow or a darting swallow, an undeserved curse does not come to rest." (Prov 26:2) I
also agree that Christians are covered by the blood of Jesus & we just need to trust in Him & His blood for protection. So the curse is undeserved for believers & we have nothing to fear.
So I am not scared of it. I just want to make sure there is no influence from anything like that, particularly affecting non-Christians who do not have the protection of the blood of Jesus and therefore they deserve to be cursed because of their sin (Prov 26:2). For me in that particular case, it was an act of obedience to what I believed God was saying to me.
If Paul's handkerchief can be blessed & bless/heal people it comes into contact with (Acts 19:11), then it stands to reason that the opposite also applies - things associated with wickedness can have an effect (e.g. an idol). For people not in Christ, disobedience to the law (e.g. witches/satanists worshipping other gods Deut 27:15) results in the land (Jer 23:10, Mal 4:6) & the crops (Deut 28:18) of the land being cursed in that location (Deut 28). I don't think it's too much of a stretch from crops (which come out of the ground & which people consume) to a road which sits on the land & which people 'consume' by driving on it. This curse occurred whether they believed they were cursed or not - it's an absolute truth. So it's not only the curse (on tape & the location), there is also the associated act of disobedience
(worshiping other gods).
If a verbal curse has an effect only based on what one believes, why was Balaam told not to curse the Israelites (Numbers 22)? Why would God turn Balaams verbal curse into a blessing (Deut 23:5) if it didn't matter? The Israelites were in the distance, they wouldn't have even heard, let alone had the opportunity to believe it or not.
Years after Joshua cursed of the person who would rebuild Jericho (Jos 6:26), it had an impact (1 Kings 16:34). I guess you could argue that news of this was passed down & the person feared it. But if this were the case & the person believed it, they wouldn't have built it & put themselves in that situation.
In 2 Kings 2:23-24, Elisha cursed a group of youths. The bears that came out of the woods & mauled them as a result of this were separate & distinct from any belief or not that the youths may have had.
Proverbs 30:10 Says "Do not slander a servant to his master, or he will curse you, and you will pay for it." It doesn't say "Do not slander a servant to his master, or he will curse you, and if you believe what he says you will pay for it."
In Mark 11:21, Jesus did not spray plant killer on the tree, He simply cursed it. And being an inaminate object, it could not choose to believe or disbelieve.
Proverbs 18:21
The tongue has the power of life and death, and those who love it will eat its fruit.