Are there any? All I can think of is Tina Turner's "Simply the Best".
This.Ideas like this make me want to run head first into a brick wall. Why take a song that has nothing to do with religion and completely vitiate the meaning the original writer had for it?
And why would we want to use such man centered songs as "You Raise Me Up" to worship God? Shouldn't it be about Him and not us?
By that thought process, I'm going to start suggesting our church sing a couple Marilyn Manson songs... because it's about what's in our hearts, you know. I can think of a few that I could twist around to work well.I think it is perfectly plausible to use secular songs for worship purposes, the song itself is not nearly as important as what the individuals singing it have in their hearts.
By that thought process, I'm going to start suggesting our church sing a couple Marilyn Manson songs... because it's about what's in our hearts, you know. I can think of a few that I could twist around to work well.
Are there any? All I can think of is Tina Turner's "Simply the Best".
Honestly if I heard a secular song being played in worship I would grab my stuff and walk out of the church right then. How can one worship in spirit and in truth to a song written by a non-believer for the purpose of praising something other than God?
We are all wicked sinners only by faith and love for Jesus can we be saved.It hurts me to see this because only God knows our hearts and who loved him,we are all in the hands of God we cannot judge our brothers and sisters and as long as you love Jesus you are saved.Yes I have actually seen Michael profess his love and faith for God and i dont believe everything the media says just as i we take no notice of what the pharises say about our lovely Jesus.peace by the wayPlenty of thoroughly wicked people have been "very religious" throughout history. Jesus said that we would know his followers by their fruit, not by how religious they are. And the fruit of the life of Michael Jackson was humanism, excess, and perversion. He never made a confession of faith (except to say that he liked the teaching of Muhammed), and never wrote songs to glorify God. There's nothing wrong with enjoying his work for its artistic merits, but using his songs for worship would be contrary to the purpose of worship. The same applies to other secular artists, and for that matter, to any song written by a Christian which was meant to entertain rather than to glorify God.
Again, there's nothing wrong with enjoying music for its own sake, but worship is a sacred thing, and music written for any purpose other than God's glory is by definition profane. No reason should need to be given for why the two must be kept separate.