You just know.... when he sends all heathens and non-believers to the fire pits of hell.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sorry about that ALW, if you would let me know what puzzles you I will do my best to put that right.ALW said:Navigator6,
Who/what are you??? I have read some of your posts and you are most puzzling.
N6 is the same person as Wayman, before he was banned. If you want to get an idea of his beliefs take a look at Wayman's posts.ALW said:Navigator6,
Who/what are you??? I have read some of your posts and you are most puzzling.
Boanerge, dont say "cant" (actually you said can not in post 17) omnipotence remember![]()
Of course I have no problem with those beliefs, although I do not hold to them myself. Wayman/N6s Difficulty is that he's a bit of a Fundie where those beliefs are concerned. Like most religious zealot's he insists that his particular set of beliefs are "absolute truth" and anyone else's are completely wrong. Of course, like other Fundies, he has absolutely no substantive evidence to back up these claims, and requests for evidence are met with circular arguements at best. This combined with his haughty attitude and abuse of other people for daring to believe differently is what led to his being banned as Wayman and his subsequent return as N6.This Book of Man has been written by Robert George Crosbie, known to the followers of The Way as The Son of The Widow. The purpose of writing this book is to offer Mankind the final opportunity to look about them as the foretold time of his ending draws ever closer. This book of Man is the original text of the book which was later corrupted and misinterpreted, and became known as the Bible.
Many will reject this book, and many will fear because of it. The few will not, as it will stir their minds in accordance with the workings of reason which resides within those very minds. That faculty of reason--which is the genetic inheritance bestowed upon them by the original reasoning mind of Adam Edam, who first stood upright, walked upon the Earth and gained reason many thousands of years ago--will be a faithful guide to them, as it was to Adam Edam in his times. It remains to be seen if those who profess reason will be able to look at the less palatable parts of their nature. Will you recognise the lower nature of the beast, which resides within you, even as the birth pangs of the Ending of Days begins to wipe the beast that professes to be humane, but is not, from the very face of the Earth? Will you overcome that nature by reason and follow that which is reasoned?
Beware of the beast that resides within, as it will consume itself as the serpent in the circle, at the Ending of Days by virtue of blind and untenable belief and brazen stupidity. The book is set before you; read it or reject it. The choice is simple. As always in matters of The Way, the choice is yours.
About the Author:
Rober George Crosbie is known to the followers of The Way as the Seventh Sign, the Son of the Widow and the First and the Last. He is the High Commander of the Brotherhood of Nazarenes, who are also known as the Brotherhood of Light. He awaits for the few--the very few--who have mind to reason and understand of his words and of the message within this Book of Man, as the beginning of the ending of the days of Man comes upon us.
I asked you previously if you would like me to post some evidence, you declined to answer, so I did not post any. As it happens I have recently posted some in the thread " The Seventh Coming". This is not from the Book of Man although it is still Nazarene material.Havoc said:"he has absolutely no substantive evidence to back up these claims,and requests for evidence are met with circular arguements at best."
Havoc said:actually I said substantive evidence, but who's counting.
You provided your "evidence" before when you were Wayman. Your idea of what constitutes evidence is no different than the average Fundie Christians idea. Which is not surprising.
You are not alone, I don't think anyone here has a clue where I am coming from, and Havoc is a prime example.ALW said:N6What puzzles me most is that I cant seem to tell if some of your phrases are in jest or if I just have no clue where you are coming from.
The Book Of Man was written over a long period of time, it was started way before Jesus was around, sorry to be vague but I can't give a precise date, I don't think anyone can, but I will make some inquiries.ALW said:From Havocs post, I see there is a train of thought that I was unaware of and need to look up. First big question set when was the Book of Man written?
The bible was constructed by removing portions from the Book of Man and adding on other bits as it suited them. The bible is a completly *******ised pocket version of the Book of Man. The Book of Man has seven volumes, each roughly the size of the bible.ALW said:and how is it that it is the original text of the Bible (not going to disagree with the corruption part)?"
Bob Crosbie is around right now, the Way is hated by "other Christian denominations.", as what we have describes Jesus as a VERY different person that the Jesus of the bible. I don't think it would be fair to describe the Way as a Christian denomination, as we have just as much respect for Odin and Buddha as Jesus. I guess this will confuse you even more, but it happens to be the case.ALW said:and when was Robert George Crosbie around? and how is the Way viewed by other Christian denominations.
Thanks, ALW
Navigator6 said:As I think I said earlier, if you would let me know what exactly puzzles you I will do my best to explain.
Navigator6 said:The Book of Man has seven volumes, each roughly the size of the bible.
Navigator6 said:the Way is hated by "other Christian denominations.", as what we have describes Jesus as a VERY different person that the Jesus of the bible. I don't think it would be fair to describe the Way as a Christian denomination, as we have just as much respect for Odin and Buddha as Jesus. I guess this will confuse you even more, but it happens to be the case.
Hmmm, I posted the statement from the pope about the "revelation of Christ" as I thought it relevant to the thread. I took it to mean that as far as the pope was concerned, Jesus was not coming back, which flies in the face of christian doctrine.ALW said:Lets see - from this thread - your first post was a statement, a question and a challenge all in one. Makes me wonder what kind of person approaches things that way. Not that its a bad thing because I have been known to do that in other areas of life![]()
All this originated from a group known amongst other things as the Nazarenes, they go back many thousands of years before the start of christianity, there is no connection with the place now known as Nazareth. *The Nazarenes are also known as the Brotherhood of Light. They are the same people that are responsible for the dead sea scrolls, and are generally refered to nowadays by those not familiar with the Way as the Essenes.ALW said:How about where it originated from? What group of people?
When those knowledgeable on biblical matters are confronted with the Book Of Man the response is a deafening silence. I will post a bit from volume one.ALW said:Do Bible historians generally ecknowledge the exsistance of the Book of Man?
Really ?ALW said:Nope, not confused even more. That actually makes sense to me.
I don't think you were mistaken, as we have a very high regard for Jesus, which I suppose would make us technically christian, amongst other things. It's just that christianity as we now know is what Jesus would have despised.ALW said:Sorry I mistakenly considered the Way a Christian denomination.
I see him as a real man, the son of a man, not some weird man/god hybrid, let me just say that i see him as nothing like the wally of the bible who wandered aimlessly around the middle east hallucinating all over the place.ALW said:Could you pick the top 3 (sorry, I see you like things in 7s) ways of how you see Jesus differently than most Christians?
This......(All numbers are added together until you are left with one number e.g. 22 + 35 = 57 = 5+7 = 12 =1 + 2 = 3 ) is not a part of the prophecy, it is there just to explain the system, I think it could have been worded better as as it is, it only serves to complicate things. I have myself pointed out exactly what you have pointed out to me, but at the end of the day the odds are exactly the same. Don't get hung up on the numbers thing, there is far more convincing evidence than that.ALW said:Oh, and this number 10 thing from your other thread..... most places I have seen the number 10 is reduced down to the number 1. Why not in your case?
I suppose one could have a whole theory on 1+0=1 in a symbolic sense....... Oh, golly, going to be pondering that concept for a while.![]()
Navigator6 said:Hmmm, I posted the statement from the pope about the "revelation of Christ" as I thought it relevant to the thread. I took it to mean that as far as the pope was concerned, Jesus was not coming back, which flies in the face of christian doctrine
The challenge was to try get people to post their thoughts on the matter, as it has been my experience that when confronted with something that threatens their beliefs they tend to go into denial, it's a bit like "don't bother me with the facts, my mind is made up " Nobody took up the challenge as can plainly be seen which is a pitty.
Navigator6 said:All this originated from a group known amongst other things as the Nazarenes, they go back many thousands of years before the start of christianity, there is no connection with the place now known as Nazareth. *The Nazarenes are also known as the Brotherhood of Light. They are the same people that are responsible for the dead sea scrolls, and are generally refered to nowadays by those not familiar with the Way as the Essenes.
Navigator6 said:I am a follower of the Way. The Way as it is known, is not really a religion as it has no deities or any system of worship, the cornerstones of the way are Truth, Knowledge, Reason, and Logic. The Nazarenes are the teachers of the Way.
Navigator6 said:When those knowledgeable on biblical matters are confronted with the Book Of Man the response is a deafening silence. I will post a bit from volume one.
Navigator6 said:I see him as a real man, the son of a man, not some weird man/god hybrid, let me just say that i see him as nothing like the wally of the bible who wandered aimlessly around the middle east hallucinating all over the place.
Navigator6 said:as it is, it only serves to complicate things Don't get hung up on the numbers thing, there is far more convincing evidence than that.
ALW said:I dont see how the Popes statement is related to the second coming .
The Nazarenes and the Way are World wide.ALW said:do you know the geographic location?
I guess it could be described as such. The Way is a dedicated anti religion organisation.ALW said:If you dont consider it a religion, do you consider it a philosophy?
Who knowsALW said:Well, what I read looks to take a bit of time to work through. Maybe they are processing????
He was the Sixth High Lord of The Veil, and he paved the way for the Seventh.ALW said:In that case, what do you see as his significance?
Navigator6 said:THE SUNDAY TIMES: NEWS
MARCH 12 2000
"Even his grip on doctrine is being prised away. One Jesuit theologian has accused him of "rank heresy" after a previously unreported public meeting last month at which the Pope announced that the revelation of Christ was " definitive and complete", a view that ammazed theologians. According to orthodox doctrine, the revelation will not be complete until the second coming of Christ."
Please can you give me a link, I would be interested to see the original speach myself. One thing puzzles me though, if as you are saying, the pope was saying something altogether different, then why has he been accused of "rank herresy" by the jesuits?ALW said:I went and tracked down what I think is the Pope's original speech (I would link here but I seem to get computer yelled at each time I try to paste). To me, what the Pope is saying is not what many of the quotes I found seem to think he is saying.