Actually in Luke 2, there is a reference to Jesus and the concept of being a full member of the community. Jewish boys from the Galilee area (more orthodox than the Judean area) were only allowed go to Jerusalem for Passover if they had completed the bet sefer portion of their education (memorization of the Torah for one). They were permitted to go to Jerusalem and present the Passover lamb at the Temple on behalf of their family as was the custom of the day. This was an informal bar mitzvah if you will and indicated to the community that this boy was ready to move on to the bet Talmud portion of their education.
Luke 2 doesn't say anything about Jesus presenting a lamb for his family, or that he was now authorized to read the Torah in the Temple. This is a case of an explanation being invented to support a later ceremonial development.
Luke 2:41 Every year his parents went to Jerusalem for the Feast of the Passover. 42 When he was twelve years old, they went up to the Feast, according to the custom. 43 After the Feast was over, while his parents were returning home, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem, but they were unaware of it.
Not a word about a coming of age ceremony, a lamb being presented, a custom of having a son present the lamb for the family as part of a bar mitzvah, nothing like that. It's especially weird since even Jewish historians agree that bar mitzvahs came about in the 12th century, 1,200 years after the events of Luke 2.
Upvote
0