This is well reasoned and I appreciate your position.
Thanks.
Why do you and I read the same verse yet hear in our hearts two different meanings?
Could it be one of us hears only what they want to believe? I pointed out the error of comparing the phrase "I have not showered" with "I have not believed". Showering is a routine activity, as understood by everyone but bush people. Believing is not.
A person has ever believed or never believed. It is that simple.
When the Bible speaks of who will be condemned as "those who have not believed", it isn't speaking about those who haven't showered today but did yesterday.
Here's the fact: if a person has ever believed, it cannot be said of them that they "have not believed", because they actually did at one time.
And there's nothing in either verse (Jn 3:18, 2 Thess 2:12) to indicate that believing needs to be done more than once.
Here's an example that is closer to the verses.
"I have not been to Mount Everest". Can you honestly say that this statement doesn't preclude that the person HAD been to Mount Everest in the past? Of course not.
Why? Because visiting Mount Everest doesn't include the idea that it is something routinely done. Anyone would have to agree that it could easily be a one time event.
Why are there literally millions of people on either side of this issue?
The Bible tells us that Satan has "deceived the whole world".
1 John 5:19 -
We know that we are children of God, and that the
whole world is under the control of the evil one.
...
Rev 12:9 - The great dragon was hurled down—that ancient serpent called the devil, or
Satan, who leads the whole world astray. He was hurled to the earth, and his angels with him.
One way he leads the world astray is by false doctrines, to disrupt Christianity. That would explain diametrically opposed theologies and denominations.
I am grateful that you have shared with me your thinking on this. And I admire your steadfast assurance that your reading is correct.
If anyone can show me from the texts HOW my reading is incorrect, I'd be very grateful.
I am far less certain than you that my understanding is correct. However, I have learned over the years to trust the actual words of the Bible, as I am best able to understand them, and not rely on the understanding of others.
My understanding of Scripture is based directly on the actual worlds of the Bible and compared with the rest of Scripture.
The glaring hole in the doctrine of loss of salvation is that are no actual clearly stated verses to support the idea.
All the verses include metaphors, which are anything but clear, or statements that don't complete the idea. For example, Arminians point to "all the warning verses", as if each and every one is a warning about loss of salvation. Yet, upon examination, none of them even speak of salvation, but less loss of salvation.
In fact, these warnings to believers are a warning of God's divine discipline, such as Paul listed in 1 Cor 11:30, or James 5:19,20. Nothing about losing salvation, but directly about loss of blessings, health, and even ultimately physical death. That's no way to be called home, don't you think?
I don't think my salvation depends on getting this one issue correct, or yours either.
Well, consider this. What is the essence of saving faith? What, exactly, are you actually trusting IN for your salvation? iow, what is the ultimate determining factor regarding whether you enter heaven or not?
So, God bless you Brother and forgive me if I do not have the energy to contend with you further on this. I think you enjoy the "battle" and there is nothing wrong with that.
I do enjoy defending God's word. I hope my challenge about the essence of saving faith will help you to determine where your actual faith is placed.
From too many Arminians, I see from their posts that their real faith is in their own behavior and efforts in final salvation. Even though they won't admit it.
For me, my faith is ONLY in what Christ did for me and what has been said about those who have believed in Him for salvation.
1. They receive eternal life. John 5:24, 6:47, 1 John 5:11, 13
2. They are forgiven once for all. Acts 10:43, Heb 7:27 with ch 10
3. They are new creatures. 2 Cor 5:17
4. They are sealed with the Holy Spirit, who is a deposit which guarantees our inheritance for the day of redemption, as God's possession. Eph 1:13,14
5. They have passed from death to life. John 5:24
There are probably a few more points, but they escape me for now.
Anyway, what I have seen from Arminians is this:
1. no verses that clearly and plainly state that salvation can be lost.
2. their emphasis on what they MUST DO to either keep or regain salvation.
3. direct opposition to what Jesus said in John 10:28.
I have asked several posters this question.
Can recipients of eternal life perish?
No one has answered the question.
It's not a trick question, but rather a very important one.
For, Jesus said recipients of eternal life shall never perish.
Yet, the loss of salvation crowd does believe that recipients of eternal life CAN perish.
That's the difference between me and Arminians.
I believe what Jesus so very plainly said. Recipients of eternal life SHALL NEVER PERISH.