MichaelFJF
Well-Known Member
After the last couple of years, the UN is not a measuring stick of anything. The fact that they hesitated only shows they are incapable of action. M
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
MichaelFJF said:After the last couple of years, the UN is not a measuring stick of anything. The fact that they hesitated only shows they are incapable of action. M
Hmmm - and what was the name of the operation again? I think they name 'em before they start 'em. Mwatt said:when the war started was anyone thinking of this as a war to save iraq? all i heard were threats.
have you ever thought of what if they had passed the second resolution based on WMDs and invaded Iraq?MichaelFJF said:If they were right, Saddam would still be in power. Nice thought. M
I'm sorry but very explicit in the UN charter is that the UN cannot infringe on the right of soveriegn nations to manage their own internal affairs.alonesoldier said:The United Nations lost it's cred along time ago.. you think something else would have made it worse? They played the part of Saddams harlot for 12 years, what could have made that worse? What were they waiting for sweeps week to stop him. lol![]()
alonesoldier said:In other words...
If anyone sincerly believes that then they don't deserve freedom.
alonesoldier said:No, I don't care to hear for your reasoning for leaving Saddam Hussein in power. I'm not in the mood for your lawyering, but it's a free country, just don't expect me to respond to some inane reference to international law to justify genocide.
Except that to spend the 3.5 trillion, we have to suck every drop of oil out of the ground in Iraq. Is that what you insinuate we are going to do?sedders said:Blemonds, you know that you (incorrectly) said the war cant possible be about oil because it would be cheaper to just buy the oil then spend what you have on the war (about$US87b i think).
Well my point was to show that you were wrong, as there is at least $US3.5 trillion worth of oil.
Unless of course you think you're going to spend that much to rebuild it, but i doubt it.