wow there we have a tiny snip of your post where it appears that I actually agree with a piece of it -- and so not too surprising that it is also found in centuries old documents written by Ellen White.
"Christ was not alone in making his great sacrifice. It was the fulfilment of the covenant made between him and his Father before the foundation of the world was laid. With clasped hands they had entered into the solemn pledge that Christ would become the surety for the human race if they were overcome by Satan's sophistry" Youth's Instructor - 1900 ( YI June 14, 1900, par. 6)
The text explicitly states that it was made before the foundation of the world, and it was a clasped-hands agreement between the Father and Son rather than a forced mandate of the Father to the Son
"The purpose and plan of grace existed from all eternity. Before the foundation of the world it was according to the determinate counsel of God that man should be created and endowed with power to do the divine will. The fall of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent. Redemption was not an after thought, a plan formulated after the fall of Adam, but an eternal purpose, suffered to be wrought out for the blessing, not only of this atom of a world, but for the good of all the worlds that God had created". (Signs of the Times - 1893) ST February 13, 1893, par. 3
That text specifically states that it was NOT an "after thought" it was NOT "a plan formulated AFTER the fall".
But "should we expect" such informed clarity on what was being taught in Ellen White's day - among ex-SDAs? some say it is not reasonable to expect them to have such a clear presentation of the historic facts. I am not sure that is the case. Maybe they should indeed be informed on that point though they might be reluctant to post it.
"Sorrow filled heaven as it was realized that man was lost and that the world which God had created was to be filled with mortals doomed to misery, sickness, and death, and that there was no way of escape for the offender. The whole family of Adam must die. I then saw the lovely Jesus and beheld an expression of sympathy and sorrow upon His countenance. Soon I saw Him approach the exceeding bright light which enshrouded the Father. Said my accompanying angel, “He is in close converse with His Father.” The anxiety of the angels seemed to be intense while Jesus was communing with His Father. Three times He was shut in by the glorious light about the Father, and the third time He came from the Father we could see His person. His countenance was calm, free from all perplexity and trouble, and shone with a loveliness which words cannot describe. He then made known to the angelic choir that a way of escape had been made for lost man; that He had been pleading with His Father, and had obtained permission to give His own life as a ransom for the race, to bear their sins, and take the sentence of death upon Himself, thus opening a way whereby they might, through the merits of His blood, find pardon for past transgressions, and by obedience be brought back to the garden from which they were driven. Then they could again have access to the glorious, immortal fruit of the tree of life to which they had now forfeited all right." (Early Writings) EW 126.1
Wow! it is the "exact opposite" of the ex-SDA post! How is that possible that the real historic position in published statements is exactly the opposite of the suggested accusations made?
It appears to me that the environment for making such false accusations is most "ideal" when the group these accusations are made for - has the absolute least amount of information on the topic specific to the false charge made.
So then why come here to make those false accusations? how does that make any sense at all? why not go some place where the readers are much less likely to have read the public documents that refute the accusation?
IT appears that you provide the text book example of a failed accusation as if you had not read the basic material. You would not even have needed to read nine-volumes to get this one right - and still you missed it? How is that even possible.
