Ok..... She obviously means an entirely different sense of "stolen".... as in she never disputed that Trump was the completely legit president.Sort of. Not in quite the same sense. Four Years Later, Bitter Hillary Clinton Claims 2016 Election Was 'Stolen' From Her She doesn’t claim fraud in the actual election, but that she would have won without the FBI announcement that after the election turned out to be nothing. I’m inclined to agree. But she didn’t fire up her supporters or inspire them to storm the capitol.
Louie Gohmert would certainly vote to have her stay.I am not the only one who would like to forget about her, she is a serious problem. BUT then every party has to have one.
Interesting assertion. Also interesting that you provided zero evidence that anyone should take it seriously.I checked it out.
Your claim about the contents fell through spectacularly.
Of course an election "could be" stolen sometime in the future.
She claimed that Trump stole the election, with the help of Russia, that he is an illegitimate president I could post an article for evidence if you like but I think almost everyone knows what she has said many times over the past four years.Of course an election "could be" stolen sometime in the future.
But to our point: she never claimed any electoral college winner was anything but legit.
Of course she said he got Russian help, which is true.She claimed that Trump stole the election, with the help of Russia, that he is an illegitimate president I could post an article for evidence if you like but I think almost everyone knows what she has said many times over the past four years.
Again, this was a claim that Russia influenced how people voted by spreading disinformation. I think there's good reason to believe this. But it's not a claim that the vote itself was faked or that it should be set aside.She claimed that Trump stole the election, with the help of Russia, that he is an illegitimate president I could post an article for evidence if you like but I think almost everyone knows what she has said many times over the past four years.
Bottom line. Thats should be enough for this sub topic now.....But it's not a claim that the vote itself was faked or that it should be set aside.
Hear it with your own ears, Hillary said He is an illegitimate president.Of course she said he got Russian help, which is true.
But she's always admitted Trump is the legit pres. There's was no "Stop the steal!" nonsense.
Is saying that he is an illegitimate president anything to be concerned about or that the elections was stolen?Again, this was a claim that Russia influenced how people voted by spreading disinformation. I think there's good reason to believe this. But it's not a claim that the vote itself was faked or that it should be set aside.
Is saying that he is an illegitimate president anything to be concerned about or that the elections was stolen?
If there had been a violation of law he would have been charged by now thinking otherwise is simply not thinking.Nope. She said that as a private citizen, simply exercising her right to free speech, and nothing more.
Trump, on the other hand, as President of the United States, made accusations of election fraud -- without evidence of any kind -- and took steps to overturn the election. Some steps were legal, such as the 60+ court cases (all unsuccessful) and some weren't, such as trying to coerce Georgia's governor to "find" votes and demanding VP Pence decertify electoral votes.
Entirely different situations.
-- A2SG, trying to conflate them is both ludicrous and ridiculous.....
Wow let's be thankful neither she nor her fans built an anti constitutional insurrectionist movement around that.Hear it with your own ears, Hillary said He is an illegitimate president.
Hillary Clinton calls Donald Trump an ‘illegitimate president’
If there had been a violation of law he would have been charged by now thinking otherwise is simply not thinking.
He has not been sitting for a while not so what is the next excuse.He was charged, in the only way a sitting president can be: he was impeached.
-- A2SG, it was in all the papers, surprised you missed it.....
He has not been sitting for a while not so what is the next excuse.
Go back and Read the post I responded to, thenHe was still president when he was impeached, dude.
The Senate just hasn't held the trial yet. But the impeachment happened before January 20.
Out of curiosity, what point do you think you're making by denying these simple, provable facts?
-- A2SG, if you're just defending Trump in everything and for everything, no matter what, then just say so....
Go back and Read the post I responded to, then
Read my post again. anyone figure this out, it is not complicated
to make this simple and easy to understand, Trump could have been charged with a crime the moment he left office, that did not happen, because there is no evidence that would support criminal charges. Is that understandable? Impeachment is a political process if you have control of the House you can impeach anyone in government for almost any reason without much of anything in the way of evidence. Is that understandable?I read them the first time, and I stand by my response.
The facts remain.
-- A2SG, but by all means, feel free to show me the factual errors I've made....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?