M
MrPirate
Guest
Claiming something is a fact implies actual evidence to back it up.It's a known fact that human sexuality changes over time regardless of one's religious persuasion. In my lifetime I've seen straights turn gay and gays turn straight.
And surprise surprise. You provided no evidence for this fact
you are misrepresenting people (what a shock there)Look at the people in the public eye that have crossed over -- Elton John from married to totally gay, David Bowie from bisexual to married, Anne Heche from gay to married.
gee bisexual people getting married. Who would have thought?
Again this claim of facts yet no facts providedTo rationalize all this away, one political wing defines sexuality in a such way that change isn't really possible. I call it "sexual predestination." It is based on the illogic of a posteriori rationalization where the facts must be forced to explain the "holy grail" theory of "sexual immutability" rather than theory explaining the facts.
No one, including Ms. Heche, is claiming she is or was gay or that these is now heterosexual for that matter.This is how it works:
Let's say Anne Heche stays married for the rest of her life and she is no longer physically attracted to the same sex at all. Well then she's a bisexual according to the "predestinators." The fact that she even dabbled with gay sex at some time in her life makes her bi-sexual according to them. It's an irreversable "taint" that she's always stigmatized with by the gay-affirming crowd that says: once-gay always-gay.
No one, including Ms. Heche, is claiming she is or was gay or that these is now heterosexual for that matter.Let's say Anne Heche divorces, renounces anything to do with hetero sex -- and says that she's really interested exclusively in the same sex. Well then she's really "gay" according to the predestinators, and she just found it out through self-discovery.
Particularly since the claims made by you are unfoundedAs you can see there is no science involved in this definition.
Gee like predicting David Bowie is bisexual .If immutabilaty theory had a scientific basis, then it could be used to predict a person's final sex-orientation long beforehand.
Just like no one can tell if a person is right or left handed at the moment of birth .oh wait you probably didnt want any facts like that in this little discussion sorry carry on.If there was science involved then a person's sexuality could be determined on an a priori basis. To further prove that "immutability" theory is logically flawed, nobody can tell if a person will be gay or straight when they are born.
When human cloning becomes a reality, inevitably there will be two people identical in every respect except one will be gay and the other straight.

Upvote
0