Sorry, but humans tend to be rather subjective creatures with various subjective beliefs. That's the problem with free will.![]()
Do you agree that God is truth?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sorry, but humans tend to be rather subjective creatures with various subjective beliefs. That's the problem with free will.![]()
Do you agree that God is truth?
Yes. I believe however that we as humans aren't always all that great at detecting "truth".![]()
Hence the Holy Spirit. Truth itself.
Sorry, but humans tend to be rather subjective creatures with various subjective beliefs. That's the problem with free will.![]()
No doubt but that wasnt my point.
The poster stated God is truth and God owns science, yet the poster decides to reject portions of science, that they claim God owns.
Seems to be a significant contradiction to me.
The Holy Spirit is certainly our direct connection to truth. We as humans however do subjectively interpret all of our life experiences, even our experiences of/in the Holy Spirit.
Yes, we see that with many, when God's will happens to always align with what is best for those who seek it.
Not really. I essentially do the same thing. I reject Lambda-CDM outright, and yet I believe that God essentially "owns" science. Over the whole of eternity, he's certainly mastered it better than mere humans.
The Holy Spirit is certainly our direct connection to truth. We as humans however do subjectively interpret all of our life experiences, even our experiences of/in the Holy Spirit.
That is the beauty, and some might perceive as a pitfall, of unconditional love.
That happens a lot in string theory too by the way.![]()
I do lack belief in some types of hypothetical "science" based on a lack of laboratory evidence to support such a claim. String theory would be a great example.
I understand what you choose to reject based on your personal beliefs. So you are ok with Gods ownership with parts of science, but are not satisfied with his ownership in other parts of science?
I wouldnt call it unconditional love. I would call it unmitigated need to see what you want to see. I know, I know, parts of science you disagree with do this as well.
Don't be modest. God is all truth and all who reject God reject truth.
None the less, science that claims to be for truth and rejects truth, isn't really for science.
God owns science.
I think a lot depends on how one practices their "science" as well as their religion. IMO there doesn't *necessarily* have to be a conflict between religion and science. Furthermore, they can both be in agreement at various points in history and still both be wrong as the Ptolemaic astronomy model demonstrates.![]()
Is Lambda-CDM a part of 'scientific truth' as God perceives it, or just a part of "human theory"? IMO God owns everything that I see, everything that exists, absolutely everything, including religion and science.
Some religion and 'scientific theory' just don't square well with what God might perceive as 'truth science' from the perspective of an ancient being that may have existed for eternity. Our human concept of 'science' probably seems pretty primitive and quite laughable to God IMO, particularly as it relates to "how did humans get here" type questions.![]()