• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Refuting Calvin's TULIP

RC1970

post tenebras lux
Jul 7, 2015
1,904
1,557
✟88,184.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
"Straw man fallacy" From Wikipedia

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".
 
Upvote 0

gordonhooker

Franciscan tssf
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2012
1,883
1,046
Wellington Point, QLD
Visit site
✟319,632.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Yep there are some really different doctrine within some of the denominations - I most assuredly reject the doctrine of Calvinism as described by TULIP. I have seen the details spoken of in the original post before and I have to agree with the author, but that is only my opinion.
 
Upvote 0

Winken

Heimat
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2010
5,709
3,505
✟213,877.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I acknowledge and appreciate your efforts in this thread, but I do not believe that you can lift OT scripture out of its context then place it in the NT, specifically the Good News according to the Apostle Paul in the latter case. I also wonder about utilizing scripture directed to the Jewish folk, as recorded in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and others in the NT. I could go through your presentation line-by-line with what I believe to be necessary to "adjust" your conclusions in this thread.
 
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,695
8,049
.
Visit site
✟1,249,161.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single

Which would be OK. Remember though, that I quoted this work from another source.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,908
...
✟1,319,906.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The following are very popular beliefs today.

(a) Calvinism,
(b) Eternal Security, or
(c) the Belief that Sin does not separate you from God

But what is popular does not mean it is correct or true.


...
 
Reactions: rockytopva
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,695
8,049
.
Visit site
✟1,249,161.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
For me if you can show me the Christian life then yes, I will buy into your eternal security. If you are partaking of the evil of this world then no, I cannot buy into your eternal security. I have a lot of Baptist friends whom I believe are eternally secure... And then I have some Baptist friends who think no wrong of fornication, whom I don't believe as eternally secure. I have told people who believe they are eternally secure and don't think nothing of fornicating with others that I do not think they can live that life and make heaven... In which they will look at me and say, "Are you trying to threaten my salvation?"

So apparently... They have embraced enough Calvin that it has become dangerous to them!
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
That sounds like a good idea.

I'd like to see what you think. It probably would be easier for you to add your comments in red.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Please don't put Calvinism side by side with eternal security. Yes Calvinists believe in eternal security but a lot of other fluff. Eternal security does not define a non-Calvinist or Calvinist.
 
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Please don't put Calvinism side by side with eternal security. Yes Calvinists believe in eternal security but a lot of other fluff. Eternal security does not define a non-Calvinist or Calvinist.

That's true, but it is still not supportable and it is a dangerous heresy. It can lead to presumption and sin.
 
Reactions: rockytopva
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,695
8,049
.
Visit site
✟1,249,161.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
That's true, but it is still not supportable and it is a dangerous heresy. It can lead to presumption and sin.

I have thought the same exact thing. Nothing wrong about being confident of the salvation, as long as the life backs up the profession.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
That's true, but it is still not supportable and it is a dangerous heresy. It can lead to presumption and sin.
Anything can be taken out of context and misconscrewed, but eternal security is the way God set it up. So we could reside with Him forever.

Talk to Jesus if you don't like the answer.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I have thought the same exact thing. Nothing wrong about being confident of the salvation, as long as the life backs up the profession.
And whose thinking is that? Yours. Of course. Man comes along as says what they think and insert it into what God says and what God will do, to satisfy what mankind thinks is justice.

Was it justice that a perfect God took your sin upon Himself? Not in anyone's mind but God's. But His love wants us, His Children reconciled back to Himself.

Remember love which is the base of both of the commandments Jesus left us with?

We are not justified by our works or the outcome of our life or Jesus's death was not enough. The Father seems to think so as He raised His Beloved Son in glory at the ressurection, but hey if you think that a good life is needed, who is God to say any different?mm Excuse me if I believe that when my Lord tells me that God's gifts are irrevocable and that we are sealed in the New Covenant by the Holy Spirit in our hearts as a pledge of what IS TO COME. The future.

Romans 11:29
29 For God’s gifts and His call are irrevocable.

2 Corinthians 1:21-22
21 Now it is God who establishes both us and you in Christ. He anointed us, 22 placed His seal on us, and put His Spirit in our hearts as a pledge of what is to come.

It is your and others lack of faith that tells you Jesus sacrifice is not enough unless you do something. But that is not what God says. Jesus says IF YOU LOVE ME follow my commandments, not if you don't want to go to hell or anything else. Just so blessed to hear what men think when they lack the faith to believe what God has already told us.

I know there are a few key texts in James that your ilk use to justify their works based platform because their faith is not enough and Jesus death is not enough, but maybe think a little more highly about what God says, after all it is Him who decides, not human beings.
 
Upvote 0

Mountainmike

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nov 2, 2016
4,819
1,644
67
Northern uk
✟666,474.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The fascinating thing of course is that even the most ardent "sola scriptura" adherent such as Calvin, did not believe in Sola Scriptura at all.

"TULIP" is Calvins tradition, he put in place of early apostle tradition, except in his case it was certainly man made tradition, made up by Calvin at the time of the reformation.

It is also a tacit admission by Calvin that Sola Scriptura is false.

If scripture carried unambiguous meaning with it - as all sola scriptura adherents must believe - why did Calvin find it necessary to add "tulip" to scripture? Not that any disproof of Sola Scriptura was needed. The bible and simple logic clearly oppose it.

Calvin didn't actually want to do away with authority either (as was the magisterium, councils and pope) Calvin clearly wanted to BE pope and ACT in place of councils, whilst having no valid claim to apostolic succession at all. I can find Peter and the succession office of keys in the bible, and apostolic succession and the passing of faith by tradition, I certainly cannot find Calvin anywhere. Or Tulip!

"by their fruits you will know them".
The fruits of the reformation and Calvin has been tens of thousands of schisms and disagreements on doctrine. In Calvins case take just one disagreement of many, even amongst Calvins followers...double and single predestination. Because once you lose tradition and authority and empower the priesthood of all believers to make up their own version, the result was inevitable! Endless versions of doctrine. Visible in endless mutually contradictory permutations of eucharist, baptism, clergy, liturgy, salvation (including predestination), rapture, sacraments, LGBT, prolife and marriage issues....you name it reformationists disagree profoundly on it. Calvin, Luther and Zwingli were the fathers of Chaos of tens of thousands of denominations and non denominationals besides.. And tulip.

But Jesus promised us HIS church would be one, and the gates of hell would not prevail against it.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Thursday
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,695
8,049
.
Visit site
✟1,249,161.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single

I always thought of it as a great doctrinal web... In which they keep spinning, and spinning, and spinning!
 
Upvote 0

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian

For many of us one only needs to accurately state the Calvinist position to "disprove" it, insomuch as their view of God would seem contrary to God's character as many of us understand God's character.

Take for example God's judicial nature. Calvinists clearly embrace the idea of "imputed guilt", which by its very nature is unjust and therefore should be discarded. And much as Calvinists insist upon interpreting passages to support such an idea, and discarding any interpretation contrary to Calvinism, they end up embracing an inherent contradiction.

When I've talked with Calvinists about this particular point they generally come back with "God is not just in human terms". But the scriptures were written to humans. So when we read in 2Th 1:6 for examaple that "God is just", the word "just" is supposed to mean something to us humans, namely that God punishes evil and compensates victims of unjustified suffering. But to say God is not just in human terms is the same as saying God is not just, since you're talking to humans. And so in Calvinism God imputes guilt to people who hadn't actually committed the crimes of which they are accused, which is what we humans call "unjust".

The fact that Calvinism views God as "unjust", in human terms is for me sufficient evidence against Calvinism. And this is just one of the evidences against Calvinism. But likely you'll never convinced a "Calvinist" of that.
 
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,695
8,049
.
Visit site
✟1,249,161.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
When a wise scholar hears the Tao, he practices it diligently.
When a mediocre scholar hears the Tao, he wavers between belief and unbelief.
When a worthless scholar hears the Tao, he laughs at loud at it. - Lao Tzu

There are also degrees of Christian (Mark 4)

Some on good ground - I would give them their eternal security
Some on stony ground - Unstable - I would not consider them eternally secure
Some by the way side - Inconsistent - I would not consider them eternally secure
Some in the thorny way - Lustful - I would not consider them eternally secure

So I would say to the one in four... I have no problem with you eternal security. To the 3 of 4 I would warn them of the perils of their way.
 
Upvote 0

jimmyjimmy

Pardoned Rebel
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2015
11,556
5,727
USA
✟257,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married

If as a child your father spent the rent check on booze, and he made you work on the farm rather than attend school, do you imagine that you would be attending Harvard Law or work in a coal mine?

Through no fault of your own, you suffer for what your "head" did.

The same goes for any nation. Did Germans suffer the greatest possible pain for the actions of Hitler?

It takes more than a surface understanding to wrestle with these issues.
 
Upvote 0