Refreshing...If There Were Only More Black Leaders Like This One...

[rjs330]

how is that working out?

attack like how you keep falsely claiming that Charlie Craig and David Mullins targeted Jack Phillips bakery?

Like the idea that police brutality is wrong?

what beliefs exactly?

i have no idea what color your skin is all i can judge is your character

I think it was getting better every day. Miles and miles of difference from Malls day. This day and age racism is practically out the door, with a few pockets still around. But over all we are in a good spot. A few minor tweeks are all that are needed.

They did target his bakery.

Police brutality is wrong. But it's an extremly rare circumstance. They make it out to be rampant. See it's the ideas they present, not the color their skin. So you are still in error making accusations that our opposition is based on race. You still prove my point.

The woman's Marxist beliefs of course. Which again have NORHONG TO DO WITJ HET SKIN COLOR.

Weren't you judging people for attacking black people and black organizations? Because of the color of their skin? You're not trying to say black people are attacking BLM, it's founder etc cause of their skin color are you?

 

[rjs330]

just try to explain Jim Crow or lynchings or the KKK without talking about the basic tenants of CRT

Easily done. We did it for years without accusing all white people of being racist just cause if their skin color. Our even stating the entire white race must pay for the sins of their fathers. Even if they weren't involved.

 

[rjs330]

Duplicate

 

[variant]

Right but we don't just take accounts at their word...they're evaluated against known facts. Magellan writing about an island of dog headed people isn't to be taken seriously, it was a lie to sell books.

Known facts, obvious bias, other accounts from different perspectives.

Pretty much everything we can get our hands on to figure out what happened.

Even still it can be tough.

 

[Chrystal-J]

Exactly, like reading the bible. (Though a large quantity of christians have never really read the bible, only some bits)

I wish more atheists would read it instead of making snap judgments based on snippets of scripture and articles about the bible (from atheist sites). (Referring to people I know, not you.)

 

[SilverBear]

They did target his bakery.

no, that isn't true

 

[SilverBear]

Easily done.

well go ahead

 

[rjs330]

no, that isn't true

Somebody did then cause he got dragged into the legal system for it. Who was it then?

 

[rjs330]

well go ahead

See post 102

 

[rjs330]

Here are some examples of the evil of CRT in schools.

Some examples of critical race theory in schools

Critical Race Theory in American Classrooms | City Journal

In the city journal there is a link to slides for the teaching program for the high schoolers. Reading through those slides will.give a good idea on just how bad this is. "Confronting Whiteness in the Classroom."

Dad-daughter duo speaks out against critical race theory

 

[Arcangl86]

Somebody did then cause he got dragged into the legal system for it. Who was it then?

So if you come up to me to say hi, I punch you in the face and then you sue me for battery, were you targeting me?

 

[SilverBear]

Somebody did then cause he got dragged into the legal system for it. Who was it then?

he broke the law, it was his own doing.

 

[SilverBear]

See post 102

if you had answered in post #102 i wouldn't have had to prompt you to go ahead and explain Jim Crow or lynchings or the KKK without talking about racism

 

[Ana the Ist]

Known facts, obvious bias, other accounts from different perspectives.

Pretty much everything we can get our hands on to figure out what happened.

Even still it can be tough.

Exactly....it's a process of evaluating the reliability of evidence and trying to account for knowns and unknowns.

This is the opposite of CRT which just starts with assumptions about what is true and apparently, who should be believed.

 

[variant]

Exactly....it's a process of evaluating the reliability of evidence and trying to account for knowns and unknowns.

This is the opposite of CRT which just starts with assumptions about what is true and apparently, who should be believed.

If It's a theory it would have to seek to explain evidence rather than make assumptions.

 

[Ana the Ist]

If It's a theory it would have to seek to explain evidence rather than make assumptions.

Well it's not really "critical" nor is it really a "theory".

It is about race though.

 

[SilverBear]

Well it's not really "critical" nor is it really a "theory".

That is your assumption

 

[rjs330]

So if you come up to me to say hi, I punch you in the face and then you sue me for battery, were you targeting me?

I don't get your point. What's that got to do with anything. If they were the ones to sue him or they and get him in trouble they targeted him. They could have left him alone.

 

[rjs330]

he broke the law, it was his own doing.

The law is wrong.

 

[rjs330]

if you had answered in post #102 i wouldn't have had to prompt you to go ahead and explain Jim Crow or lynchings or the KKK without talking about racism

You said CRT, you didn't say racism. Two different things. We talked about racism of the past while I was in school. We didn't have CRT hogwash shoved down our throats.