- I do find it remarkable that the objection to this forum has made a seemless transition from an accusation that forum members and the administration of the website were deliberately promoting Satanism through the secret forum to a range of concerns about its effectiveness in helping the members on it. This started as a witch hunt, literally, and it still has traces of that.
- Questions about the suitability of a website to help people with this problem are legitimate. They are not, however, limited to this secret forum, nor did they suddenly become legitimate after 7/7/7. I do think the entire effort to help people through the recovery forums ought to be revisited, and some sort of consensus should be estabished as to what responsibility the forum staff will take in dealing with the issue. That should be communicated to the membership clearly in each and every recovery forum, and it should guide decisions about what is and is not appropriate procedure for the recovery forums.
Rule 3 of the Recovery guidelines does tell people not to pose as experts, but what is needed is additional language to the effect that staff at 4U are not to be considered experts, and will not act in such a capcity, etc. If such qualifiers (and actions in accordance with them) are not adequate to the new secret forum, then they are certainly not adequate for ANY of the other recovery forums either. There is no particular reason to believe the staff have overstepped their authority in this case any more than the others, but if it's an issue, then deal with the issue at large.
- As a side note: not all help is professinal help. Sometimes helping someone in recovery means taking your recovering alcoholic friend out for a sober activity on Friday night. Sometimes it means talking to someone in a friendly manner about things on their mind. Sometimes, it means just not being a jerk when the subject comes up or assuming the worst about them on a regular basis. I think a lot of the support forums could be looked at in such a manner, but that does mean establishing some boundaries for both those helped and those trying to help. It may well be that this forum goes beyond that, and it may not. Most of us will probably never know. I would personally hope that the goal of the staff included a very concerted effort to help Moriah seek professional help, and if that is the case, then that alone makes a plausble case for the forum.
- The website structure is not legislation. If the staff feels it is appropriate to create a special forum with special rules, then they are certainly entitled to do so. The wisdom of that decision is certainly open to question (though in this case lots of relevant info is missing). In either event, the notion that this is precedent (a theme in many of the objections to this forum) does seem quite out of place.
- Sometimes you have to say 'no' to people who want help, for your sake as well as theirs. Maybe this was/is one of those times. It would really help if a large part of the argument in favor of doing that was not tied to the political infighting of this forum.