Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The rule of evidence is that you need some. You have NO DNA from pre KT. (where I reckon that the flood era was near). You have diddly squat. Talking about court cases in recent history is disingenuous.
Since you evidence that science cannot tell us about the former nature, no one really cares if you disbelieve the Almighty or not, because He dun told us the future and past.
I was working with what geology and other so called sciences preach, that the present is claimed to be the key to it all.
That would be Jesus.
It is an extension of the truth and life of God and is alive!
Not the way it would here. Not in heaven.
Gold will be clear then, transparent. That is further evidence nature is different!
Exactly, so forget radioactivity...that is of this present state. Get it yet?
It is caused by the forces and laws in place now. You get that much??
Because the ratios came about by creation, and then the different nature in the past, as well as to a small small degree by today's nature. Today's nature is just a little piggy backer. It had to work with what was here, and do so in a way that God ordered for the new nature. That means seamlessly. Notice Noah spanned both natures?
Really? How on earth did you get to that conclusion? I think that you're not telling the truth about the natural science of geology here.I was working with what geology and other so called sciences preach, that the present is claimed to be the key to it all.
No it doesn't, but thanks for playing.
That changes with the wind. It also is worthless. You need to show the basis for your claim and the support, not allude to some opinion.By "The opinion" I meant the scientific one.
False. Provable??!! What a joke. They are religious twaddle. Show the basis for any deep time claim on earth and we will see.Yes, it's unscriptural. That's because I am of the opinion that the majority of scripture is false. I used evidence that I accept to be true. "You cannot do time well." Meaning? What is the basis for my "time claims"? Also, they aren't "a religious joke" as you put it. They are scientific truths, absolutely provable by science.
You have an opinion, wow. Ignorance based opinion at that.No, I would never use their perspectives because I am of the opinion that neither exist. I meant the perspectives of current, information age man and ancient, bronze age man.
Prove it or lose the claim. If the different nature in the far past did not allow man to leave remains like fossils, how would you know??!Firstly, although Pangaea existed, it was not in existence when humans were around.
Totally imaginary years and time. No basis in reality, they are based solely on a belief that our state existed along with it's forces and laws that cause radioactive decay.Pangaea was formed about 270 million years ago, and broke up about 200 million years ago.
Mankind was here from the start. You have no basis for your fantasy claims. If you think you do, get to it man, time is a wastin.As mentioned in my post about dinosaurs, humans ( referring to homo sapiens ) first arose about 200,000 years ago. 200,000<200,000,000. Considering that humans several thousand years ago had little to no effective medicine, used bronze tools as opposed to any stronger metal, and believed the Earth was flat, among other things, they were not smarter than us. The edges of Pangaea weren't well know until very recently, within the last hundred years in fact.
Not now. Irrelevant. Totally.1) Fossilization is not selective in which animals it fossilizes.
Circular logic. 'We know they were not here because they didn't fossilize as our laws would have them do'. You are peddling religion here. Fables.2) Humans couldn't fossilize 70 mya because they didn't exist that long ago.
Now...maybe. However in a different state past where little and large animals and bacteria like little thingies may have specialized in rapidly disposing of certain life forms, that would not be the case.3) Every animal with a skeleton (regular or exoskeleton, it doesn't matter) can have fossilized given the right environmental conditions.
Billions of us over time do not think Christ rising from the dead is balderdash. They even set the year to His life. The prophesies are tested fulfilled, a done deal. Proven over and over and over and over.Science uses clear criteria for dates, that much is true. However, I can say that christians use even clearer criteria for dates based on godly balderdash ( the previous statement does not make either of us right,nor is it an attempt to do so. ) . You still have provided no evidence for why science is wrong, or christians are right.
A gift is given. Face it.No it doesn't. It isn't up to you.
To post requires a poster. To be defeated requires someone or something to do the defeating. A gift requires a giver. To be endowed means something ot someone did some endowing. Etc. How sweet it is.You've been defeated. Face it.
And ... I didn't use the word post. Trying tmake things up?To post requires a poster.
I'm AirPo, The Defeator. Nice to meet you.To be defeated requires someone or something to do the defeating.
No, it doesn't, as I have shown.A gift requires a giver.
I didn't use the word endow either. Making things up may work for The HI Theory,To be endowed means something ot someone did some endowing. Etc. How sweet it is.
No. The gift of writing science fiction is natural.
That involves giving FYII didn't use the word endow either.
Explain how one gets a gift with no one or noting giving that gift then.Again, no it doesn't.
Been there, done that. One of the most valueable test taking skills I learned in school was to go back and check your work for errors. Good advice since the most obviuos errors are sometimes the easiest to make. I suggest doing the same as it would be a much better learning expierence for you rather than me explaining it yet again.Explain how one gets a gift with no one or noting giving that gift then.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?