• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Re-Thinking Hell

Status
Not open for further replies.

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Matt 10 text does not "fear Him who can make you lost"

And...?

Not sure why you think that statement is relevant to anything I said.

The Lost Sheep of Israel are already lost. That is who Christ came to minister to in fulfillment of the Law, Prophets, and Psalms. It is a separate ministry from the Ministry of Reconciliation.


It is the "details" in the Bible as seen in this post that I am in favor of -- #284

And the details are wrong, not details of the Bible, not relevant to the post.

You are trying to make a temporal context eternal. Physical Sodom was completely destroyed, but the people still await judgment.


There was no
"destruction but not death" in Matt 10

So Israel was physically dead?

Israel had Eternal Life?

No, Israel was dead. They did not have eternal life. That is the very reason Christ came, that men might not perish but have everlasting life. The perishing is not physical, it is eternal. It steps outside of the physical and into the eternal.

They were in a state of destruction (translated "lost") yet they were physically alive. Sodom is physically dead but still awaits eternal judgment. When they are judged they will fare better than those that rejected Christ:


Matthew 11:23-24
King James Version

23 And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.

24 But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.



"destruction but only incomplete" in Matt 10

"Incomplete" implies that further destruction awaits those in Hell. Simply not in the text, and not found in any other text either. If you have such a text please present it.

The Lost Sheep of Israel were in a state of destruction when Christ came to minister to them. They were lost. This is the state of men today that have not been born again.


"eternal life but not very happy in that life" in Matt 10

?

Where exactly do you see eternal life in...


Matthew 10:28 King James Version (KJV)

28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.


...?


Also not in Ezek 28 as noted above.

Not relevant to Matthew 10:28. Or 10:15 either, for that matter.


Sola scriptura testing - means that these inconvenient details cannot just be dismissed out of hand as if that is the highest form of accuracy.

I agree.

It also means not imposing into Scripture what isn't there.

This lends itself to not imposing into another member's posts that which isn't there.


God bless.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
When I mention sola scriptura testing, list bible details that don't fit your suggested solution -- you simply respond with "you are wrong all the time". Imagine a protestant reformation where "you are wrong all the time" was their "sola scriptura" compelling response.

I don't think anyone is going to be able to charge me with "responding simply."

What I said is that you have a knack for being wrong all the time. This is true of your position as a loss of salvation teacher as well.

I listed the Bible details about Matthew 10:28 and you responded with a vague statement about it which turned into an off-topic response to what it is I said.

And you were wrong, sorry.


You have free will and can choose as you wish of course. But I suggest your "you are wrong all the time" conclusion aptly sums the way you are treating the details in the texts that I keep pointing out.

It sums up my interchanges with you. Could you point out a post where you actually made a point that was valid?

As far as you "pointing out" anything, this happened...where?

How does speaking about Sodom being a pile of ashes have anything to do with the Lost Sheep of Israel? With a state of destruction which is not a cessation of existence?


My main focus is on the "objective unbiased readers" of these exchanges.

How magnanimous of you, lol.


I am blessed beyond that if the person I am dialoging with also is interested in the Bible details I keep pointing out

So you have been blessed with our exchanges discussing the Biblical Truth that Eternal Salvation is in fact Eternal, not something that might be eternal if someone works hard enough?

That's awesome!


but that does not always happen.

Gee, I wonder why...


What does almost always happen - is that an objective unbiased reader sees what is going in the exchange

Now this I agree with, lol.

And that is the reason for what I do.


You can't simply "tell them what to think"... they look at the details pointed out.

Not sure how addressing proof texts used out of context and showing why they are out of context is "telling people what to think."

Secondly, are you telling people "what to think" when you object to a doctrinal position?

Or does that only apply to people that disagree with you.

Perhaps you should read the posts before coming to conclusions. This is almost as bad as coming to doctrinal positions without reading Scripture.


God bless.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Now see - there is a perfect response sequence --

I say that the details in -- #284 make the case in triplicate..

And you say you can't see anything.

There's a difference between me saying you haven't pointed anything out and me not seeing anything.

Can you really not post what someone actually states?


I am very happy for the objective unbiased readers to view that and do their own evaluation of the details you claim are not pointed out in #284

So you aren't really interested in discussing what I said, you are seeking to do something other than what this forum is designed for.

Good to know.

But if you want to discuss the actual statement I made and try to address it, if in fact you are opposed to it, then I will be glad to further entertain you, Bob.

Here it is again:


Matthew 10:28 King James Version (KJV)

28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.


At first glance, it seems that the Lord is speaking about destruction that is complete and most will understand this in physical terms. The word translated destroy is apollymi, and it needs to be pointed out, first, that (in the above verse) is not the same word translated as "kill," which is apokteinō. Why that is significant is that many will read this and correlate the two as though the same fate is in view.

It's not.

The use of the term "soul" also has to be understood, in that while many view "soul" to be a reference to an immaterial aspect of man...it isn't. "Soul" is a reference to the person, rather than his spirit. Man was created with a body and a spirit, and became a living soul, so he is a soul, rather than "has" a soul.

So look back at our proof-text and consider that the soul, the person, can be killed by men, but then there is nothing more they can do. Now note that God does not kill the body and soul, but "destroys both body and soul. Here is the key: The body refers to the physical existence of men which can be killed, but body and soul refer to the totality of the man. When the dead are raised to be judged, they too will receive bodies suited to eternal torment. Similar to being glorified with one primary exception, they do not have the life we receive when we are placed in Christ. Then we look at what God can do to both body and soul, which is to destroy them, and we ask—can this have an unending context?

All we have to do is back up and see a people that already exist in a state of destruction:

Matthew 10:5-6 King James Version (KJV)

5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.


The word translated "the lost" is the same word translated "destroy" in v.28, apollymi. Israel was in a "state of destruction" because they were what the "Lost" will be for eternity...separated from God.

Again, we consider the difference between an eternal context and a physical. They were separated on a basis of relationship through the Covenant of Law, which earns them their designation as "lost sheep."

But being Lost has a greater context, an eternal context (meaning that context pertaining to Eternity, God's Realm). All men are born lost, that is...separated from God. Those who go into Hell (the Lake of Fire) will be for eternity separated from God. The primary point of all this being...we consider those who are "lost," in a state of destruction, "destroyed" by God...who have not ceased to exist. The same will be true in regards to Eternal Judgment. The destruction points to something not possible among men in regards to imposing damage in the physical sense.

God will destroy the person in a physical sense forever.

Another point would be found in the correlation of statements made in Jude and 2 Peter 2 where the description does not really allow for a cessation of existence.

Another point would be the Lord's rebuke of the original Annihilationists...the Sadducees (Matthew 22:23-32). They believed that when men died that was it. The Lord rebukes them for not knowing the Scriptures or the power of God. While this would not immediately deny plausibility for Annihilation and it could be argued that it doesn't speak towards Eternal Judgment being everlasting, or, that it simply makes the point "they haven't passed out of existence yet," when we balance everything said it leaves little room for embracing Annihilation as Biblical, thus should be rejected.

It is not just the teachings of Christ we must take into account, but the entirety of what Scripture teaches.

Just as a note, I have not seen a distinction drawn between Hades and Gehenna in this thread that clearly distinguishes between the "place of the dead" which will be emptied at the Great White Throne:


Revelation 20:11-15
King James Version

11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.

12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.



No one has been cast into what most view as Gehenna Hell, the Lake of Fire, that we know of. When men die today they go to hades/sheol (which I believe is still divided between the just and unjust (both of which were not eternally redeemed during their lifetimes)). A few of the doctrines necessary, in my view, to understand this properly would be whether man is a dichotomy or a trichotomy, whether men were born again in Old Testament Ages, and when men are placed in the Book of Life. Understanding Eternal Judgment requires more than just a look at what the Lord taught.

God bless.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,381
11,921
Georgia
✟1,095,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The Lost Sheep of Israel are already lost. That is who Christ came to minister to in fulfillment of the Law, Prophets, and Psalms.

Jesus' teaching was "God so loved the World" John 3:16 -- before the cross.

Not "God just loved the Jews back then"
 
  • Like
Reactions: wendykvw
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,381
11,921
Georgia
✟1,095,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:
It is the "details" in the Bible as seen in this post that I am in favor of -- #284

looks like this - for those who are losing track --

I am very happy for the objective unbiased readers to view that and do their own evaluation of the details you claim are not pointed out in #284

Matthew 10:28 King James Version (KJV)

28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

end of story if one is going to accept it as it reads.

At first glance, it seems that the Lord is speaking about destruction that is complete

The "as it reads" part.


and most will understand this in physical terms. The word translated destroy is apollymi, and it needs to be pointed out, first, that (in the above verse) is not the same word translated as "kill," which is apokteinō.

Indeed it is going BEYOND what man can do - rather than claiming that God can do even LESS than what man can do.

=============================
Luke 17:29 apollumi

“ but on the day that Lot went out from Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. (destroy - Apollumi )

Which is why it is so instructive to see in 2 Peter 2 "destroyed by reducing them to ashes" that we see in 2 Peter 2

2 Peter 2:6
6 “and if He condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to destruction by reducing them to ashes,

The point, Bob, is that the destruction of those in Hell is a continual existence.


God bless.


Only if existing as a pile of ashes satisfies your criteria for "continued existence"

Apparently God does not equate the idea of continuing as a pile of ashes as "continued existence" in His Ezek 28 statement.


Ezek 28:
Therefore I have brought fire from the midst of you;
It has consumed you,
And I have turned you to ashes on the earth
In the eyes of all who see you.
19 All who know you among the peoples
Are appalled at you;
You have become terrified
And you will cease to be forever.”’”


And the details are wrong, not details of the Bible, not relevant to the post.
.

Wishful thinking again? Not very compelling.

You need to bring yourself to address the actual details.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,381
11,921
Georgia
✟1,095,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Matthew 10:28 King James Version (KJV)

28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

end of story if one is going to accept it as it reads.



and most will understand this in physical terms. The word translated destroy is apollymi, and it needs to be pointed out, first, that (in the above verse) is not the same word translated as "kill," which is apokteinō.

Indeed it is going BEYOND what man can do - rather than claiming that God can do even LESS than what man can do.

=============================
Luke 17:29 apollumi

“ but on the day that Lot went out from Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. (destroy - Apollumi )

Which is why it is so instructive to see in 2 Peter 2 "destroyed by reducing them to ashes" that we see in 2 Peter 2

2 Peter 2:6
6 “and if He condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to destruction by reducing them to ashes,

existing as a pile of ashes does not satisfy the your criteria for "continued existence" - obviously

Apparently God does not equate the idea of continuing as a pile of ashes as "continued existence" in His Ezek 28 statement.

Ezek 28:
Therefore I have brought fire from the midst of you;
It has consumed you,
And I have turned you to ashes on the earth
In the eyes of all who see you.
19 All who know you among the peoples
Are appalled at you;
You have become terrified
And you will cease to be forever.”’”

You are trying to make a temporal context eternal. Physical Sodom was completely destroyed, but the people still await judgment.

Christ is the one that said "destroy both body and soul in fiery Hell" -- not me. That is not "temporal" that is the final state of the wicked... eternally destroyed not "eternally not-yet-destroyed". You claim the word destroy does not allow such a final end - but as we see in the case of Sodom -- it most certainly does!

The point remains.

It is scripture that makes the case for Satan himself "turned you to ashes" and "cease to be"... which is an example of the end-points you are ignoring so far...

Still they are "details" in that post you say you cannot see.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: wendykvw
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,381
11,921
Georgia
✟1,095,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
That is the point you are missing: the destruction in Hell will not be a complete destruction. Israel was "lost" and yet walking around in the land. .

The Matt 10 text does not say "fear Him who can make you lost"

It is the "details" in the Bible as seen in this post that I am in favor of -- #284

There was no
  • "destruction but not death" in Matt 10
  • "destruction but only incomplete" in Matt 10
  • "eternal life but not very happy in that life" in Matt 10

Also not in Ezek 28 as noted above.

Sola scriptura testing - means that these inconvenient details cannot just be dismissed out of hand as if that is the highest form of accuracy.


So Israel was physically dead?

you are back to "quoting you" and then questioning me as if I said it. Did you lose focus on the fact that we are talking about Matt 10?

Israel had Eternal Life?

There is no such thing as eternal life given to "a nation" -- change subject much?

"God so loved the WORLD" is the statement of Christ before the cross. IT is a world that was lost "not just Jews".

"Incomplete" implies that further destruction awaits those in Hell.

Not a word that is used in Matt 10:28 -- did you forget that we are discussing that text?

There was no
  • "destruction but not death" in Matt 10
  • "destruction but only incomplete" in Matt 10
  • "eternal life but not very happy in that life" in Matt 10
Also not in Ezek 28 as noted above.

And...?

Where exactly do you see eternal life in...Matthew 10:28 King James Version (KJV)

Not relevant to Matthew 10:28. Or 10:15 either, for that matter.

You have apparently lost your focus on the discussion in Matt 10:28

I listed the Bible details about Matthew 10:28 and you responded with a vague statement about it which turned into an off-topic response .

your statements are getting harder to follow -- given the details in the actual post you are responding to.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,381
11,921
Georgia
✟1,095,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:
My main focus is on the "objective unbiased readers" of these exchanges.

How magnanimous of you, lol.

You apparently missed the point entirely. The point is not about magnanimity - it is about utility. The usefulness of a discussion where person A is not paying much attention to what person B is saying. My point was that I primarily rely on the utility of the discussion as it could benefit the unbiased objective viewer. I view person A in that case as having free will and am not bothered that they refused to stay focused on details raised since the unbiased objective readers can also "see that".
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Matthew 10:28 King James Version (KJV)
28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. * * *
You are aware of the difference between "able to destroy" and "will/shall destroy," aren't you?
I am not aware of any vs. anywhere in the Bible where Gods say He has destroyed "a soul" in hell or anywhere else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: P1LGR1M
Upvote 0

GTW27

Junior Member
Aug 31, 2007
1,027
1,097
66
Western Pa
✟235,093.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The entire working of God in sinners is to bring us by His love & grace into oneness within Himself. It is called at-one-ment. It is not a one time experience, but in the present progressive tense of being born anew. Seeing Him requires an awakening of mind & heart to enter where He dwells.

He sees us wrapped into Christ. Because of His great love He ordained us. Always His perfect plan is to adopt us through our union with Christ that His tremendous love that cascades over us would glorify His grace. ~TPT
Thank you so much for answering FineLinen. "that His tremendous love that cascades over us would glorify His grace." Perhaps, that His unending Love, that shines through us, that glorifies His Son(Jesus). Long ago, The Lord said to me, "My son, there will com
The entire working of God in sinners is to bring us by His love & grace into oneness within Himself. It is called at-one-ment. It is not a one time experience, but in the present progressive tense of being born anew. Seeing Him requires an awakening of mind & heart to enter where He dwells.

He sees us wrapped into Christ. Because of His great love He ordained us. Always His perfect plan is to adopt us through our union with Christ that His tremendous love that cascades over us would glorify His grace. ~TPT

Thank you for responding Fine Linen. I see you did not accept the challenge. Still quoting man to promote. Challenge number 2 should you choose to accept it. A slow reading of The Gospel of John. Since most do not know The Word of God is alive, perhaps The Words(all of them) of Jesus will touch your heart.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
FineLinen said:
The entire working of God in sinners is to bring us by His love & grace into oneness within Himself. It is called at-one-ment. It is not a one time experience, but in the present progressive tense of being born anew. Seeing Him requires an awakening of mind & heart to enter where He dwells.
He sees us wrapped into Christ. Because of His great love He ordained us. Always His perfect plan is to adopt us through our union with Christ that His tremendous love that cascades over us would glorify His grace. ~TPT
Lovely, comforting, heart warming words. Unfortunately not one single vs. of scripture to support these words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: P1LGR1M
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
28,152
15,264
PNW
✟980,322.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Lovely, comforting, heart warming words. Unfortunately not one single vs. of scripture to support these words.
So how often should a verse be applied? One verse after every ten words? Three verses per paragraph?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

David's Harp

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2021
762
528
Scotland
✟62,094.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Matthew 10:28 King James Version (KJV)

28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

end of story if one is going to accept it as it reads.

You are aware of the difference between "able to destroy" and "will/shall destroy," aren't you?
I am not aware of any vs. anywhere in the Bible where Gods say He has destroyed "a soul" in hell or anywhere else.

I would have to second Der Alte here. You're asking us to take Matthew 10:28 as read, but you are failing to highlight the crucial words 'is able to' before 'destroy both soul and body in hell'.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus' teaching was "God so loved the World" John 3:16 -- before the cross.

Not "God just loved the Jews back then"

I'm sorry that you cannot recognize a statement of Christ for what it means.

I'm also sorry you are not interested in serious discussion.

Nevertheless, I will continue to get you to recognize your error.

;)


The point of the post was to show that cessation of existence is not taught by Christ or the Apostles. A beginning to this discussion would be Christ's statement here:



Matthew 10:28 King James Version (KJV)

28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

At first glance, it seems that the Lord is speaking about destruction that is complete and most will understand this in physical terms. The word translated destroy is apollymi, and it needs to be pointed out, first, that (in the above verse) is not the same word translated as "kill," which is apokteinō. Why that is significant is that many will read this and correlate the two as though the same fate is in view.

It's not.

You have spent quite a bit of time, Bob, speaking about what this verse doesn't say, and the point I make here is what it does say: Man can kill the body, but they cannot destroy the body and soul (person) in Hell.

For men to kill the body we see the end of that person in the physical sense. So why doesn't God kill the soul (person) and body in Hell?

Because it is not the end. Just as it was not the end for the Lost Sheep to be in a state of destruction when Christ came. They were still alive physically, but their relationship with God was dead.


The use of the term "soul" also has to be understood, in that while many view "soul" to be a reference to an immaterial aspect of man...it isn't. "Soul" is a reference to the person, rather than his spirit. Man was created with a body and a spirit, and became a living soul, so he is a soul, rather than "has" a soul.

Most cults embrace a trichotomy. Many groups we might consider traditional do so as well. But man is a dichotomy, he has a spirit and he has a body. Matthew 10:28 refers to the soul (the person) and the body.. Men can kill the body but it ends there. They have no power over the spirit that departs from the body in physical death.

It is the spirit that is destroyed in Hell. They will receive resurrected bodies when they are raised again, but they will still be "dead," because they have never received the Life of Christ.

You didn't comment on that part of the post:


So look back at our proof-text and consider that the soul, the person, can be killed by men, but then there is nothing more they can do. Now note that God does not kill the body and soul, but "destroys both body and soul. Here is the key: The body refers to the physical existence of men which can be killed, but body and soul refer to the totality of the man. When the dead are raised to be judged, they too will receive bodies suited to eternal torment. Similar to being glorified with one primary exception, they do not have the life we receive when we are placed in Christ. Then we look at what God can do to both body and soul, which is to destroy them, and we ask—can this have an unending context?

Now we see Israel, who Christ Himself said He was sent to—only:

Matthew 10:5-6 King James Version (KJV)

5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

The word translated "the lost" is the same word translated "destroy" in v.28, apollymi. Israel was in a "state of destruction" because they were what the "Lost" will be for eternity...separated from God.

Again, we consider the difference between an eternal context and a physical. They were separated on a basis of relationship through the Covenant of Law, which earns them their designation as "lost sheep."

Consider:


Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.


Perhaps you could explain to me why your view is correct and Christ's is not?

And since you know more about it than Christ, perhaps you could explain what it means that the Lost Sheep of Israel are lost?

Here is my take:

But being Lost has a greater context, an eternal context (meaning that context pertaining to Eternity, God's Realm). All men are born lost, that is...separated from God. Those who go into Hell (the Lake of Fire) will be for eternity separated from God. The primary point of all this being...we consider those who are "lost," in a state of destruction, "destroyed" by God...who have not ceased to exist. The same will be true in regards to Eternal Judgment. The destruction points to something not possible among men in regards to imposing damage in the physical sense.


As I said, you are trying to take a physical/temporal context (the literal destruction of Sodom) and impose into that an eternal context (annihilation through that physical/temporal context) despite the fact I have given you Christ's Own statement that Sodom still awaits the final judgment:


Matthew 10:15
Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.



The Day of Judgment here is the Great White Throne. Those who are not in the Book of Life will be cast into the Lake of Fire. You already have them ashes, and ignore the coming judgment Christ foretells for them.

And if their judgment is more tolerable, Bob, how exactly does a one-size-fits-all judgment work into what the Lord Jesus Christ teaches?

It doesn't. If they are all going to be burned up into ashes—how exactly is Sodom's judgment more tolerable?

But I know, it isn't a question your view can answer.


God bless.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus' teaching was "God so loved the World" John 3:16 -- before the cross.

Not "God just loved the Jews back then"

That is correct. However, you make obsolete an indisputable and incontrovertible statement of Christ:


Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.



When He sent out the disciples to preach the veiled Gospel of Christ, which was the Gospel of the Kingdom (and was relevant to those in Covenant Relationship with God through the Law because it was the Prophecy of the Restored Kingdom of Israel) He forbade them to go to Samaritans and Gentiles:


Matthew 10:5-7
King James Version

5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

7 And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand.



His earthly ministry had a focus on the fulfillment of Messiah as it pertained to Israel.

His Redemptive Ministry had a focus on fulfillment as it pertained to the Mystery of the Gospel.

That's why it was mystery, Bob—because He was not revealing the Gospel of Jesus Christ during His ministry.

And He limits his disciples from speaking of the revelation that was given to them, such as the divinely revealed truth that He was in fact the Promised Messiah, the Son of the Living God:


Matthew 16:15-17
King James Version

15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.



The Father revealed that He, Jesus, was the Christ, the Son of the Living God, but it was not meant to be made known to all men at that time:


Matthew 16:20
King James Version

20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.



Why?

Because the Gospel of Christ would remain mystery until the coming of the Comforter. Even after Christ rises from the dead they still don't get it.

Sadly, the Gospel of Jesus Christ remains a Mystery to many still. That is why we have people rejecting clear teachings of Christ. That is why people teach works-based salvation, because they are not trusting in Christ for salvation, but for their own works.

That is why Christ taught a many/few ration between the lost and the saved.

So here again is Christ's statement:


Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.


The people Christ came to minister to were lost, in a state of destruction, yet they had not ceased to exist. So too, those who are destroyed in Hell will be lost—and continue to exist.

I'm no happier about it than the Lord is, but I cannot remove from Scripture what is so obviously clear.


God bless.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Matthew 10:28 King James Version (KJV)

28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

end of story if one is going to accept it as it reads.

But you don't accept it as it reads, that is the problem.

I find it hard to believe that you cannot see the distinction between being "killed" and being "destroyed," especially when the word is used for people that are still alive.

That's the fearful thing about the statement: Men can bring an end to other men in the physical realm, but there is a realm to come for men where they are not "killed."


Indeed it is going BEYOND what man can do - rather than claiming that God can do even LESS than what man can do.

But you are the one saying God can do "less."

Man's existence in the physical realm ends, thus we see in the many physical proof texts of the annihilationist a "ceasing forever." Because they will never again be upon the earth. Not that they will cease to exist entirely.


Revelation 14:10-12
King James Version

10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:

11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.



Two groups of people in Judgment: those who keep the commandments of God and the Faith of Jesus Christ—and those who do not.

Over and over we see that the fate of these two groups defined in everlasting terms, not "for an age."


Revelation 3:5
King James Version

5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.



There will be those blotted out of the Book of Life. Universal Salvation is false doctrine.

There will be those in Eternal Torment. Annihilation is false doctrine.

Their fate is Eternal because they are removed from this creation and the one to come. They will be eternally separated from God and their judgments are said be differing.

You just can't support Universal Salvation and Annihilation from Scripture.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Luke 17:29 apollumi

“ but on the day that Lot went out from Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. (destroy - Apollumi )

Again...

Matthew 10:15
Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.


...there is yet a judgment for the spirits that died physically on that day.

Not sure why you won't cede such an obvious point.


Which is why it is so instructive to see in 2 Peter 2 "destroyed by reducing them to ashes" that we see in 2 Peter 2

Yes, the physical destruction is mentioned and their eternal fate is mentioned:


2 Peter 2
King James Version

6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:



Look at the link for "to be punished."

God is not going to be punishing ashes, Bob, He is going to be punishing the "spirits in prison."


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
2 Peter 2:6
6 “and if He condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to destruction by reducing them to ashes,

Physical judgment. Addressed numerous times already.

Just cede the point, Bob.


existing as a pile of ashes does not satisfy the your criteria for "continued existence" - obviously

That is correct because Scripture makes it clear that your notion they were completely destroyed on that day is false.


Apparently God does not equate the idea of continuing as a pile of ashes as "continued existence" in His Ezek 28 statement.

Ezek 28:
Therefore I have brought fire from the midst of you;
It has consumed you,
And I have turned you to ashes on the earth
In the eyes of all who see you.
19 All who know you among the peoples
Are appalled at you;
You have become terrified
And you will cease to be forever.”’”

"I have turned you to ashes—on the earth."

What was that you were saying about details, Bob?

Using the Old Testament to proof text doctrines like Universal Salvation, Soul Sleep, and Annihilation show an utter disrespect for the revelation of mystery in the New Testament.

Those who fail to recognize the commentary of Scripture in the New Testament which should lead the Spirit taught Bible student should give pause and wonder why their doctrines fail so utterly.

It is true, this king is gone forever from the earth. But it is equally true that he will stand before God in judgment at the Great White Throne.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Christ is the one that said "destroy both body and soul in fiery Hell" -- not me.

Correct. Not—kill both soul (person) and body in Hell.


That is not "temporal" that is the final state of the wicked...

Correct: everlasting torment, everlasting destruction, everlasting separation...

...everlasting judgment.


eternally destroyed not "eternally not-yet-destroyed".

Correct: eternally lost, just as the Israel Christ came to minister to was.

And still in existence.


You claim the word destroy does not allow such a final end - but as we see in the case of Sodom -- it most certainly does!

Sure, if you are not able to distinguish between a temporal context and an eternal. Men went to Hades/Sheol (the place of the dead) prior to the Cross (and the lost still do):


Luke 16:23
And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.


And I quote:

Christ is the one that said "destroy both body and soul in fiery Hell" -- not me.


Luke 12:4-5
King James Version

4 And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.

5 But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.



That's the problem with Modern Christendom—no fear of God anymore.

That's the problem with this country—no fear of God.

The Liberal Agenda has infiltrated liberal churches and they are doing a good job of muting those who should be preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Instead, we have people more interested in making friends on forums than people who are intent on making disciples.

Being cast into Hell, the Lake of Fire, is not a cessation of existence. It is an unending existence of separation from God.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.