And those who accepted those anonymous sources previously have had a sudden about face.
Missed part of the quote : "according to two people familiar with the exchange."
Guess anonymous sources are back to being acceptable, kinda the mirror image of deficits suddenly mattering again.
Interesting because the last thing I want is a president who cannot make command decisions, there are no perfect solutions, not making a decision is a decision in itself. “A good solution applied with vigor now is better than a perfect solution applied ten minutes later.” General Patton.Personally, I don't have a problem with the President of the United States taking the necessary time to make important issues, consult with his advisors, listen to the experts, and not rush into any hasty decisions that could come back to bite him later. It's certainly refreshing compared to his predecessor who couldn't be bothered to read Intelligence reports and had a 92% turnover during his presidency.
AND what I find is funny is that those same people who believed everything that the NYT wrote about Trump now find what they have written about Biden to be so untrue. Talk about inconsistencies.
AND what I find is funny is that those same people who believed everything that the NYT wrote about Trump now find what they have written about Biden to be so untrue. Talk about inconsistencies.
Let me explain it like this for some people it is accurate when it bashes Trump and inaccurate when is critical of Biden, do you see now?I can’t speak for others, but as I wrote in my post, I find the article refreshing that we have a Leader who take time, who push his aids, who try to relate a complex policy like climate change would effect truck driver in southern PA.
It’s not about Biden supporter or Trump supporter, my post is about your view.. in one thread you say NYT is not credible, yet you start a thread with their article.
I'll note you haven't actually named any of these people, just asserted that they exist.And those who accepted those anonymous sources previously have had a sudden about face.
Let me explain it like this for some people it is accurate when it bashes Trump and inaccurate when is critical of Biden, do you see now?
Let me explain it like this for some people it is accurate when it bashes Trump and inaccurate when is critical of Biden, do you see now?
It’s not about others. It’s about you . Either you take NYT as a credible media or you don’t. In past thread, as I pointed out in my post, you say “ NYT is not a credible media”, yet, you start a thread with their article and want to “catch” others for double standard.
AND what I find is funny is that those same people who believed everything that the NYT wrote about Trump now find what they have written about Biden to be so untrue. Talk about inconsistencies.
Imagine that? A chief executive who demands details and then deploys resources to save American lives.
They might be. And you're entitled to your own view of the matter.
Other people with somewhat different perspectives are entitled to their preferences, too.
What I said was that I would "feel better" if his own grandchildren were not his "his lifeline to popular culture and consumer technology." And yes, I would feel better about it if he chose someone else.
It not about me, Much of what the NYT published about Trump was found to be wrong when all the facts were determined.It’s not about others. It’s about you . Either you take NYT as a credible media or you don’t. In past thread, as I pointed out in my post, you say “ NYT is not a credible media”, yet, you start a thread with their article and want to “catch” others for double standard.
I think we all want that but we still have a border crisis and nothing seems to be happening to resolve it, it has been going on since Biden came into office, how long does he need to think it over? He created the problem, maybe he should have used some of that thinking and consulting before he fixed something that was not broken.I don't see anyone saying the article is inaccurate, just that we don't see what it describes as being a problem. Personally I WANT leaders to think about things in detail and consult widely before making decisions that can effect millions of people.
I would be more than happy to discuss double standards, there is one example after another of double standards and they almost all come from one side of the debate.It's an apparent attempt to "own the libs" and an attempt to accuse liberals of a double standard while clearly exhibiting a double standard. "Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones."
Interesting because the last thing I want is a president who cannot make command decisions, there are no perfect solutions, not making a decision is a decision in itself. “A good solution applied with vigor now is better than a perfect solution applied ten minutes later.” General Patton.
It not about me, Much of what the NYT published about Trump was found to be wrong when all the facts were determined.
I think we all want that but we still have a border crisis and nothing seems to be happening to resolve it, it has been going on since Biden came into office, how long does he need to think it over? He created the problem, maybe he should have used some of that thinking and consulting before he fixed something that was not broken.
Thinking is for girly-men! Some folks prefer a man who makes his business decisions by the seat of his pants, and judging by the number of mistresses, makes his marital decisions by the front of them.
Says the guy who supports the last president, who got his whole extended family into office in a grand nepotism bonanza and who spent most of his days in front of the TV or golfing.I'd feel better if his preferred advisors were not his grandchildren, and he did spend a whole day at work.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?