Questions about origins of life timeline

[bhsmte]

Science is only defeated with evidence. No evidence, no win.

It's usually a red flag, when someone needs to declare themselves a winner and in this case, it is quite obvious.

 

[dad]

Science is only defeated with evidence. No evidence, no win.

Fine! We can leave that, I don't expect you to understand that here and now. I don't give a rat's hienie about so called science's inability to deal with the truth of the future or past.

The issue I addressed was that you claimed I do not agree with the bible about the different past. Unless you show us how a man in this nature can live 1000 years, I suggest that the bible does indicate a big difference indeed did exist.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Fine! We can leave that, I don't expect you to understand that here and now. I don't give a rat's hienie about so called science's inability to deal with the truth of the future or past.

The issue I addressed was that you claimed I do not agree with the bible about the different past. Unless you show us how a man in this nature can live 1000 years, I suggest that the bible does indicate a big difference indeed did exist.

Unless you can provide evidence that people didn't just add zeros to the ends of biblical ages to make them seem more impressive, your position has no foundation.

 

[dad]

It's usually a red flag, when someone needs to declare themselves a winner and in this case, it is quite obvious.

Whether you get it yet or not, the failure of science to be able to prove the same state past, upon which it bases ALL claims about the far past leaves it defeated totally and sidelined something fierce. Period.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Whether you get it yet or not, the failure of science to be able to prove the same state past, upon which it bases ALL claims about the far past leaves it defeated totally and sidelined something fierce. Period.

What makes you think we haven't proven it?

 

[dad]

Unless you can provide evidence that people didn't just add zeros to the ends of biblical ages to make them seem more impressive, your position has no foundation.

Not a valid bible case...sorry. Let's get real.

 

[dad]

What makes you think we haven't proven it?

I don't think..I know.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Not a valid bible case...sorry. Let's get real.

Let's get real, people exaggerate.

 

[PsychoSarah]

I don't think..I know.

How?

 

[dad]

Let's get real, people exaggerate.

They have old copies of the Scripture. Name me any Jew who really thought that the ages were not real say, even a few hundred years BC???

 

[dad]

How?

By observing the repeated failure of anyone to be able to prove a same state past for years now, in a thousand different ways. Done deal.

 

[PsychoSarah]

By obderving the repeated failure of anyone to be able to prove a same state past for years now, in a thousand different ways. Done deal.

Maybe they have, and you just don't accept it.

 

[dad]

Maybe they have, and you just don't accept it.

Maybe they haven't and you don't accept it. Fact is they can't. Almost all attempts have been efforts where they FIRST want us to accept the same state past, and then engage in some inbred circular thinking.

 

[Kylie]

By observing the repeated failure of anyone to be able to prove a same state past for years now, in a thousand different ways. Done deal.

And this logic is no different to proving elephants don't exist because you can't see one in your kitchen.

You really need to learn how science works. Because your ideas about it are so wrong they're not even funny.

 

[Kylie]

The fossil record...have any evidence that man could fossilize pre flood? You might as well give topical evidence, as I think you want to wave off history and Scripture. Let's see your stuff from down under.

You got any evidence that he couldn't?

Oh, and have you got any evidence that explains why all the many different sources of evidence agree so well if they are all wrong? Or just more half baked ideas that fall apart at the slightest scrutiny?

 

[biggles53]

By observing the repeated failure of anyone to be able to prove a same state past for years now, in a thousand different ways. Done deal.

The oceans of the world used to be filled with pink lemonade....in a former state of course.....

Prove that they weren't......

Easy, isn't it....? When all you do is make evidence-free assertions you can make up any....err....manure you like....

 

[AV1611VET]

Oh, and have you got any evidence that explains why all the many different sources of evidence agree so well if they are all wrong?

My explanation for that phenomenon is that scientists calibrate their machines to agree with each another.

 

[AV1611VET]

The oceans of the world used to be filled with pink lemonade....in a former state of course.....

Do you believe that?

If not, is it okay with you if I don't believe it either?

 

[biggles53]

Do you believe that?

If not, is it okay with you if I don't believe it either?

Of course not.....but there's just as much evidence to support it as dad's past state nonsense.....

 

[AV1611VET]

Of course not.....but there's just as much evidence to support it as dad's past state nonsense.....

How much evidence supports Jesus walking on water?

Okay with you if I believe it -- despite zero evidence?