Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then show me the containment wall that surrounded Mesopotamia at the time.It can't. Water tends to flow downhill.
Then show me the containment wall that surrounded Mesopotamia at the time.
(For the sake of your junk science, I'll pretend Noah lived in Mesopotamia ... not New Jersey ... just to make your task easier. [Not that it's going to get me an honest answer.])
Sorry, another verse that you do not understand does not take away the obvious errors in the Bible.
God created three universe.
Right....
And once again, scientists did not discover that life came from water. We've known about water's vitality for life for centuries. You are now repeating things I have shown you to be false, as well as some really unorthodox views on the interpretation of Genesis. I don't see how I can have a rational discussion with you.
This is just dishonest. This argument can support any claim, regardless of the truth value of said claim; it is thus fallacious.
Most likely some form of monotreme.Ok so if primates do not go back to Pangaea then what did they evolve from. What common ancestor was alive back at the time of Pangaea?
What change is that? That as new evidence gets found, theories have to be adjusted to take those new findings into account, sometimes even being discarded completely? Even if that means textbooks have to be rewritten?Whatever statement you want to make about what evolution is going to "evolve" and go through constant change and revision. Just like text books are constantly being revised. I looked once and the ONLY changed in a text book was one chapter in the book. A $200 book can turn into a $5 book because they revise one chapter. This is the sort of change we can expect from science.
Absolutely. Why else?Often revisions are a result of new information.
Sounds like he doesn't really care about the accuracy of information he presents.My brother wrote a text book and he did not want to put the work into doing the revisions.
You have not answered my question. Which animals were on the Ark that were not already present on this earth? Specifically. Lions but not tigers? Kangaroos but not possums?It's the difference between temporary and eternal creatures. Jesus made the temporary (His kinds) and God the Trinity created ETERNAL creatures, which means that they will be in Heaven. They are THEIR kinds.
Noah brought His kinds or the kinds which Jesus made since they might or might not have been on our planet. It depends on whether they were Eternal (Their kinds) or temporary (His kinds). Remember that Jesus made the creeping kinds like Mosquitoes, which could easily be deleted IF God the Trinity chooses to delete them. All The Trinity would have to do is to NOT create them, eternally. God Bless you
The plants and animals on the Ark were what we call domesticated from the Tigris Euphrates river valley. By definition because plants and animals can only be transported if they are domesticated. A word that science uses today is botany. This includes the study of wild plants becoming domesticated.Which animals were on the Ark that were not already present on this earth?
Then how do you explain the fact that different Christians interpret the Bible differently?This thinking comes from the skeptics Bible and is the product of a reprobate mind. There is no error in the Bible - there is an error in the way skeptics, scoffers and infidels understand and interpret the Bible.
The people that interpret the Bible certainly aren't perfect, are they? Or do you claim to have perfect knowledge of what God intended as the correct interpretation of His Word?Since God the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, authored the Bible, i would be careful if I were you. Blasphemy/Slander of the Holy Spirit is the unpardonable sin. Amen?
I'm not asking about the real world that most of us live in. I'm asking about Aman777's version of reality, in which Adam and Eve's "universe" was hidden under Lake Van in Turkey.The plants and animals on the Ark were what we call domesticated from the Tigris Euphrates river valley. By definition because plants and animals can only be transported if they are domesticated. The modern word that people use today is botany. This includes the study of wild plants and animals becoming domesticated.
Being a Christian does not mean you represent God. Many are called to the ministry but few are choose because we are called to be Holy and Sanctified before God. We are called to be of one mind and one accord.Then how do you explain the fact that different Christians interpret the Bible differently?
Sorry I did not mean to interrupt your conversation. He has to answer for himself about Lake Van. My understanding of Ancient Mesopotamia comes from Science and having studied ancient history for the last 50 years.I'm asking about Aman777's version of reality, in which Adam and Eve's "universe" was hidden under Lake Van in Turkey.
The original Hebrew is perfect and we need to study the Bible in the original language. Just about every original Hebrew word would require a whole modern book to define and explain. Those who study Kabbalah really get into the expository meaning of the words.The people that interpret the Bible certainly aren't perfect, are they?
How do you know? And please don't say "because Kaballah". Any interpretation framework where if you don't get what you expect you can just add things up differently until you get what you're looking for is not something to be relied upon.The original Hebrew is perfect
Since God the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, authored the Bible, i would be careful if I were you. Blasphemy/Slander of the Holy Spirit is the unpardonable sin. Amen?
My disagreement is that you are being fallacious. It is utterly juvenile to discredit me by saying "you're being vague therefore you are afraid of me."Please be more specific in your disagreement unless you are afraid that I can refute your every word. Amen?
This is a specific form of a rather common argument against science; namely, the argument that science disagrees with itself, or changes its mind, whereas [insert alternative here] is always confident and never changes its mind. This is a purely emotional argument; humans prefer the comfort of certainty when they can get it. But if we cannot be certain about anything, what is better? To arbitrarily pick a belief and stick by it, regardless of the evidence? Or to shift one's beliefs as theories become more refined, as new evidence comes in, as the feedback loop of science and technology provides more opportunities to test previously untestable claims? Which is more likely to approach the truth? If your religion is false, its dogma will stand against all evidence to the contrary; but if science contains a false claim, it can eventually be rooted out and replaced with a more truthful alternative.Whatever statement you want to make about what evolution is going to "evolve" and go through constant change and revision. Just like text books are constantly being revised. I looked once and the ONLY changed in a text book was one chapter in the book. A $200 book can turn into a $5 book because they revise one chapter. This is the sort of change we can expect from science.
Often revisions are a result of new information. My brother wrote a text book and he did not want to put the work into doing the revisions.
But how can you tell which YouTube prophets are false and which true? How can one distinguish them, if religion is impervious to evidence?Being a Christian does not mean you represent God. Many are called to the ministry but few are choose because we are called to be Holy and Sanctified before God. We are called to be of one mind and one accord.
Right now people are complaining about so called prophets on YouTube that does not represent God. Even though there are a few people there that does represent God and they are in agreement with each other.
Paul tells us that we see dimly as a reflection in a mirror. Now we know in part and when we arrive then we shall fully know and understand.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?