daveleau said:
I didn't ask what was right. I asked a very different question that has nothing to do with what you are talking about. Frankly speaking, I think SDA has several incorrect theologies or else I would be SDA. (Christians gravitate to whatever you think is most Scriptural.) I am asking how divergent SDA can get and still be considered under the most liberal terms an SDA.
I do not believe that Branch Davidians can be called SDA's
Livingstone Fagan states that
"God is Thought" (Fagan, p. 14) and as a result the Branch Davidians are greatly concerned with the "Mind of God." Their idea of God is not, however, impersonal, as they believe in a Godhead with a Heavenly Father, and with a feminine Holy Spirit as a Heavenly Mother (
The Holy Spirit, She, 1979 and other works by Lois Roden).
That statement is not main stream SDA Theology.
To the
Branch Davidians "salvation" entails knowing and understanding the Seven Seals, as Koresh "Prophesied" and wrote
Again the SDA Church does not accept this concept at all.
Jesus is seen as having achieved this unity and becoming Christ sometime before his 40 days of fasting in the wilderness, this 40 day fast proved that he was one with the Eternal Mind of God, and could live forever, even without food and water (Fagan, p. 28). Jesus is seen as having come to teach the Seven Seals. But, mankind did not accept the Seals. Jesus had failed in his mission and was crucified. Fagan explains:
Just not Biblical at all.
Back to your original question.
I am asking how divergent SDA can get and still be considered under the most liberal terms an SDA
There are always going to be some members who will try and stretch the limits of what is acceptable and what is not.
One must believe in the Second Coming and the 7th day Sabbath.
The belief in the Trinity is also a must.
Belief in basic Christianity as along with other Christian denominations is required. In other words one must believe that Jesus Christ is the Saviour and Redeemer.
To be a geniune historic SDA I believe that one must believe in the "Sanctuary" doctrine. That includes end time prophecy, investigative judgement.
Creation of the world in 6 days and about 6,000 years old.
The "State of the Dead", soul sleep.
There are probably a few others but others can add to them if they so desire.
Once you start to leave the above list then it starts to get a bit tricky.
Take the "Trinity", if one openly disagrees with that then they may be asked to come forward and state what they believe. If there is too much difference then that person may be asked to surrender their membership. I have seen it happen.
If one smokes, drinks, or uses/sells drugs the same will also happens.
I do not go to the movies, but if someone else does then that person will not be asked to come and present a case for movie going so they can remain members. Same as coffe and tea drinking. It is something that is not promoted but one does not surrender Church membership for using them.
Most SDA's do not wear or use jewellery, but if one does then in most cases will not be asked to give up membership.
I suppose there are two main groups of SDA's, the liberals and the conservatives.
Trust that this will help you.