Vap841
Well-Known Member
- Jun 5, 2021
- 431
- 252
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian Seeker
- Marital Status
- Private
Millions of people having small details wrong is not on par with “Having millions of witnesses” for something, it’s not on par with the claim that 90 witnesses saw Mike Tyson punch a guy out in a nightclub…rather it’s on par with those 90 witnesses being inconsistent about whether Tyson was wearing a belt or not when he did it. Or the difference between 20 people witnessing a certain person robbing a store vs those 20 people inconsistently describing the guy’s sneakers.
You are overselling the “Millions of people” angle with regards to the Mandela Effect, the Mandela Effect is always precisely those little details that independent witnesses DO scramble up, as opposed to how witnesses are very consistent with the basic main facts. This is why Mandela Effect is always about inconsequential things like a punctuation mark missing or “I could have sworn the bottom piece of Japan zigged instead of zagged, as opposed to something like “Tom Brady was really a baseball player.”
Here’s something else to think about, how many Mandela Effects can you name? IF reality was really in constant flux there would easily be tens of thousands of them, and actually that would be a low number. Just think about how many things in reality would be Mandela Effects if the ground of reality itself was really moving all over the place like the Mandela Effect suggests! You need to juxtapose the enormous number of Mandela Effects that would exist if the theory is true with the extremely humble amount that are always talked about. It would be endless! If the theory was consistent you’d be able to name at least 25 Mandela Effects just in your living room alone right now.
You are overselling the “Millions of people” angle with regards to the Mandela Effect, the Mandela Effect is always precisely those little details that independent witnesses DO scramble up, as opposed to how witnesses are very consistent with the basic main facts. This is why Mandela Effect is always about inconsequential things like a punctuation mark missing or “I could have sworn the bottom piece of Japan zigged instead of zagged, as opposed to something like “Tom Brady was really a baseball player.”
Here’s something else to think about, how many Mandela Effects can you name? IF reality was really in constant flux there would easily be tens of thousands of them, and actually that would be a low number. Just think about how many things in reality would be Mandela Effects if the ground of reality itself was really moving all over the place like the Mandela Effect suggests! You need to juxtapose the enormous number of Mandela Effects that would exist if the theory is true with the extremely humble amount that are always talked about. It would be endless! If the theory was consistent you’d be able to name at least 25 Mandela Effects just in your living room alone right now.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
