Quantum Immortality Test

[JohnEmmett]

You have no evidence for your claims other than testimonials from people who claim that their memories MUST be right because they really REALLY think they're right.

In short, you got nothing.

Because of the history behind the memory.

 

[Kylie]

More straw men.

No. You don't understand what you are talking about.

Having a person disagree with you is not a strawman.

And you have NEVER supported your claims that memories are reliable.

 

[Kylie]

Because of the history behind the memory.

That means nothing. You have no evidence to support your position.

 

[JohnEmmett]

That means nothing. You have no evidence to support your position.

Romans 1:20

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

I know you believe there is no evidence.

Videos of people making claims is not evidence in support of those claims. That is all you've given us. Do you have any actual evidence?

 

[JohnEmmett]

Do you have any actual evidence?

Define evidence.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Define evidence.

Let's keep it really simple and broad to give you the biggest chance of having something - evidence in this instance would be anything that supports the claims being made. What you got?

 

[JohnEmmett]

What you got?

The truth is out there. The factor is you.

If you seek and if you find.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

The truth is out there. The factor is you.

If you seek and if you find.

Platitudes are not evidence in support of your claims.

It is obvious from your behaviour in your own thread that you cannot support your claims. Why can you not just admit that fact?

 

[JohnEmmett]

Why can you not just admit that fact?

…

 

[Kylie]

Romans 1:20

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

This is not an answer. You have no evidence for your position except for showing me a bunch of people who really believe what they claim.

And as I've already said, things are not true just because you really believe them to be true.

 

[JohnEmmett]

And as I've already said, things are not true just because you really believe them to be true.

That is a straw man argument.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

I know your karma…

Does it upset you that mine's better than yours?

 

[JohnEmmett]

Does it upset you that mine's better than yours?

…

 

[JohnEmmett]

This will continue indefinitely…

 

[Kylie]

That is a straw man argument.

No it's not.

You do not know what a strawman argument is.

 

[Kylie]

I believe that the Mandela effect is just a result of flawed memory. I know it is true because I really believe it. If you disagree, that's a strawman argument.

 

[JohnEmmett]

I believe that the Mandela effect is just a result of flawed memory. I know it is true because I really believe it. If you disagree, that's a strawman argument.

Think what you want.

 

[Kylie]

Think what you want.

You aren't actually interested in a discussion, are you?

 

[JohnEmmett]

You aren't actually interested in a discussion, are you?

No. Because you insist on flawed logic.