Psychologist says 80% chance Trump would push Nuclear button

[Open Heart]

Sounds like the stuff of which a false accusation is conjured up to rationalize the alleged need for a coup detat.

We'll never have a coup detat when we can legally impeach.

 

[Aldebaran]

Do you really think that if the uS and N Korea go to war it will be limited to those two countries? For one thing, N Korea is allied with Iran, and Iran is networked to many Nations and territories, including Gaza and Lebanon. What side do you think China would take? Russia? When it came down to a Nuclear war? Remember that the UN hates Trump as much as it hates Kim.

If NK launches nukes against the US, I don't think we'd respond by nuking them along with other countries. They weren't the ones who fired at us. As far as who NK is allied with--you make a good point for not allowing those other countries to have nukes. Iran seems to be chief among those who shouldn't have them for the reason you point out. As for China, I've heard that they are trying to distance themselves from NK. I would too if I were them. We buy their stuff all the time. I can't imagine China wanting to see us get nuked.

One big question that could be asked is: What does NK have that other countries want badly enough to ally themselves with that country and be willing to go to nuclear war to defend or avenge NK?

 

[Lukaris]

We'll never have a coup detat when we can legally impeach.

Perhaps, but in the name of “humanity” the clamor of “concerned citizens” in strategic places could render this allegedly necessary.


BTW, I originally thought this was in a politics forum. I do not mean to intrude in any way.

 

[pat34lee]

We'll never have a coup detat when we can legally impeach.

What do you think is going on in the courts today? If the President
has to go through the courts to do his job, then they have become
his masters, not his equals.

What would happen if Congress told the courts that they couldn't
touch any abortion laws passed by the states?

 

[pat34lee]

Perhaps, but in the name of “humanity” the clamor of “concerned citizens” in strategic places could render this allegedly necessary.


BTW, I originally thought this was in a politics forum. I do not mean to intrude in any way.

Politics is cross-denominational. As long as the thread
isn't marked Messianics only, then anyone can post, as
long as they follow forum rules.

 

[Open Heart]

If the President
has to go through the courts to do his job, then they have become
his masters, not his equals.

What about when he has to go before the courts because he is doing other people's jobs, or because he is going beyond the definition of his own job?

 

[pat34lee]

What about when he has to go before the courts because he is doing other people's jobs, or because he is going beyond the definition of his own job?

That actually happened with Obama. Note that the
Democrats in Congress never said a word about it.
Unanimous Supreme Court Rules Against the Obama Administration’s Unconstitutional Power Grab | myHeritage

Even the most current lawsuit, over his appointment
of a temporary leader to the CFPB is ridiculous. If the
Democrats in the Senate are going to try and block
every appointment he makes, then they are the ones
who are making it necessary to appoint temporary
ones. The current succession law that the SC is using
was not set up for Congress blocking him from doing
his duties.

The current state of politics is confusion and lawsuits.
The ACLU has taken over 100 legal actions against the Trump administration so far — here's a guide to the most notable ones

 

[Open Heart]

That actually happened with Obama

Of course it happened with Obama. And it's wrong whichever president does it, Trump, Obama, or Andrew Jackson.