proving evolution as just a "theory"

[The Times]

Looks like The Times has wandered firmly into Poe-land.

Have I said anything that the Evolutionist have not asserted in their jibber jabble to give credence to their religion. I have presented what they have taught me my friend.

 

[Ophiolite]

Have I said anything that the Evolutionist have not asserted in their jibber jabble to give credence to their religion. I have presented what they have taught me my friend.

Then you have misunderstood your lessons. I would be hard pressed to find a single assertion in any of your posts that matches reality. That is quite an achievement.

God, or evolution, or a combination gave us two ears and one mouth. You might take that lesson to heart and try listening more than you talk.

 

[pitabread]

Have I said anything that the Evolutionist have not asserted in their jibber jabble to give credence to their religion. I have presented what they have taught me my friend.

Like I said, you appear to have slept through those classes. Or had really crappy teachers.

Or maybe you're just posting goofy nonsense not meant to be taken the slightest bit seriously?

 

[The Times]

When an assertion is made for any theory, there must be made interwoven connections, that are qualitative and quantative, resulting in consistency and coherency. This definition is scientifically based and not pure heresay.

Evolution Theory fails to highlight the above, but rather appeal to ignorance or at times lack of data in the gaps of their fragmented pieces of assertions.

If there is no millions of chance existence of neomorph to xenomorph of species, whilst not confusing adaptation of species within their kind, then the definition of species must encompass form and intellegence together, this would mean that the absence of other transmutations of species from neomorph to xenomorph means that there is no contamination across species and all species were created simultaneously using the Fibonnaci embedded DNA algorithm that proves a single attempt at creation and an attempt by a single intelligent designer who is the Creator of all life, because this is his unique signature that is found everywhere Fromm hen finite to the infinite.

 

[The Times]

Like I said, you appear to have slept through those classes. Or had really crappy teachers.

Or maybe you're just posting goofy nonsense not meant to be taken the slightest bit seriously?

They tried to brain wash me and Evolution bash me in school, yet I knew deep down in my heart that something is wrong with these people. At the time I didn't know what was wrong, because I was young and very green. Now I see how they are tripping up as more and more real science highlights the signature of the one intellegencia.

 

[The Times]

Then you have misunderstood your lessons. I would be hard pressed to find a single assertion in any of your posts that matches reality. That is quite an achievement.

God, or evolution, or a combination gave us two ears and one mouth. You might take that lesson to heart and try listening more than you talk.

I have listened all my life, now it is high time that I talk and talk I will God wiling.

 

[Ophiolite]

I have listened all my life, now it is high time that I talk and talk I will God wiling.

Well, good luck with that. You'll need it.

 

[pitabread]

It cannot do that with qualitative and quantative coherent evidence, but by mere assertions and distorting of terms and concoction of bits and pieces of apparent real word adaptations that in no way, shape or form make it reality. The same methodology is used by Flat Earthers, who fail to present coherent connections. I call it the jibber jabble of fake news and this has been the flavour of the Evolution theory.

What you are describing is not how evolution is supported by the evidence. That's why I suggest you may want to update your familiarity with the modern Theory of Evolution, but you apparently have little interest in doing so.

Individual organisms are not species, they are organisms at the foundational level. This is how Evolutionist distort terms to give an appeal to the masses of species being organisms. No, you can't do that my friend.

I have no idea what you are even trying to say anymore.

I think we're done here.

 

[Tayla]

update your familiarity with the modern Theory of Evolution

I first learned of evolution decades ago. Recently I began studying modern views including the interactions with genetics, biochemistry, DNA, epigenetic activation of genes, mutations and frequency of occurrence, and etc. Much has changed.

Christians should accept the conclusions of modern science and modern psychology. I'd bet less than 1% of creationist Christians know about any of this.

 

[The Times]

Ladies and gentlemen biological organisms are not by defintion species. Species must have both form and intelligence.

Biological organisms, consisting of complex cellular structure are machines. These biological machines have plants, that is, they are a black box processing inputs and outputs in a feedback control manner. In engineering we call them plants, consisting of machinery.

These biomechanical plants, can within the constraint of the resultant species or kind, be experimented on, by injecting certain inputs into the plant, to get a variation of the same species, let us say for example a wolf to a dog specie.

These are merely adaptations and not evolution. The single intelligent designer has incorporated within each black box plant, an operating range, by which the same species can adapt across a range of environmental conditions, food conditions and other threats.

There is no organisms that evolve, rather it is evidence of adaptation within the constraint of the same species. For example an organism can be modified to produce a splicing within the same kind or seed or scale or whatever. You can have a splicing of orange and mandarin, called tangerine, however you cannot have the machinery plant of an orange be manipulated to produce a melonrange, that is an orange and a melon.

Each cellular plant has its mechanical constraints and variations are expected by design and not by evolution. If I built a device that can have a wide range of uses depending on its input configurations, then does that mean that it is evolving whenever I configure it with a different input?

Absolutely not!

Evolution Theory is a fictional assertion of life evolving, when there is evidence of life adapting. This is where Evolutionists confuse terms and never use the term adaptation, instead swap adaptation for evolution and then deceptively claim that organisms that are adapting are evolving and this assertion could be nothing further than the truth.

Don't be deceived by your teachers and those who brow beat and bash you with evolution religious doctrine.

 

[The Times]

I first learned of evolution decades ago. Recently I began studying modern views including the interactions with genetics, biochemistry, DNA, epigenetic activation of genes, mutations and frequency of occurrence, and etc. Much has changed.

Christians should accept the conclusions of modern science and modern psychology. I'd bet less than 1% of creationist Christians know about any of this.

You have a statement that is very vague. Please elaborate what modern psychology you speak of.

 

[The Times]

Well, good luck with that. You'll need it.

As a an engineer luck is not a position of a rationale mind. I have shown that to accept evolution theory one must throw away a rationale mind and to embrace a religious like doctrinal dogma, that is appealing on the surface.

I can see why evolution theory would be appealing to some who yearn for the sensationalist views, like the Earth is Flat theory.

I have no problem with people who religiously and piously hold their religious dogma.

 

[Tayla]

You have a statement that is very vague. Please elaborate what modern psychology you speak of.

Studies regarding perception, brain function, consciousness, mapping regions of the brain, memory of events by eyewitnesses -- there are so many areas.

 

[The Times]

Studies regarding perception, brain function, consciousness, mapping regions of the brain, memory of events by eyewitnesses -- there are so many areas.

That is adaptation of the plant mechanics that develop, not evolve.

 

[The Times]

The term evolution must trace neomorphs to xenomorphs to actual improved and completely different species. No such evolution exists, that even hints at species cross over or contamination. Cross species is unheard of. Evolution from rock to whale to man is absolute lunacy.

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

iam trying to prove to a friend that the christian way is the true way but he tells me to give an explanation of evolution and dinosaurs.

any things i could say to prove him wrong?

love
camila smith <3

< shrugs > ANy and all truth proves him wrong, but that doesn't mean he will believe.
RE the title - "evolution" has been a theory all along, with many theories, or many changes, several times a year I think as "new" information proves it wrong that often, and they are embarrassed but won't admit it, so change the "theory" instead, trying to cover up....

It has always been just a theory - why is any proof needed - it has never been any more than a theory !?

 

[Jimmy D]

The term evolution must trace neomorphs to xenomorphs to actual improved and completely different species.

If you're saying that evolution doesn't account for fictional aliens you're correct, I don't see why you think it "must" though.

No such evolution exists, that even hints at species cross over or contamination.

Did anyone suggest otherwise?

Evolution from rock to whale to man is absolute lunacy.

You're right! Only a lunatic would believe such a thing.

 

[Jimmy D]

< shrugs > ANy and all truth proves him wrong, but that doesn't mean he will believe.
RE the title - "evolution" has been a theory all along, with many theories, or many changes, several times a year I think as "new" information proves it wrong that often, and they are embarrassed but won't admit it, so change the "theory" instead, trying to cover up....

It has always been just a theory - why is any proof needed - it has never been any more than a theory !?

Are you really suggesting that biologists are aware that the TOE is wrong but keep lying to save face? All of them?

 

[The Times]

If you're saying that evolution doesn't account for fictional aliens you're correct, I don't see why you think it "must" though.

Life transmutations from neomorphs to xenomorphs species, through many evolutionary misses, over millions of millions of years, would indeed be alien species to the resultant human species that would arrive on the scene millions of years later. This is evolution 101!

Why are you surprised! Ha!

Did anyone suggest otherwise?

Yes, Evolutionists. Are you surprised?

You're right! Only a lunatic would believe such a thing.

You are right Evolution 101 is absolute baloney!

 

[AV1611VET]

Christians should accept the conclusions of modern science and modern psychology. I'd bet less than 1% of creationist Christians know about any of this.

Does that 1% include Martin & Deidre Bobgan?