proving evolution as just a "theory"

[Jimmy D]

Life transmutations from neomorphs to xenomorphs species, through many evolutionary misses, over millions of millions of years, would indeed be alien species to the resultant human species that would arrive on the scene millions of years later. This is evolution 101!

Why are you surprised! Ha!

I'm not following you there.

This is Evolution 101 - Welcome to Evolution 101! I couldn't find the bit about fictional aliens.

Yes, Evolutionists. Are you surprised?

Which one specifically? It sounds more like the ramblings of a fool to me, what exactly is "species crossover or contamination"?

You are right Evolution 101 is absolute baloney!

Except of course only a fool or a liar would believe that the Theory of Evolution implies such a thing.

 

[The Times]

If we saw and could both qualify and quantify neomorphs and xenomorphs of species as the result of the many misses of millions of millions of evolutionary misses, then we would see many embedded algorithmic DNA patterns.

We would not have a single path to life, rather the numerous paths, would be the failed paths, having different DNA embedded algorithmic signatures.

We would see fossil remains of species like this.......

Sorry too gory to show.....

I can't believe how some Christians fall for Evolution of humanity from the neomorph to xenomorph species.

Evolution teaches cross species contamination, which is unheard of and is taken right out of the Alien franchise movies. Maybe they need to realise the implications of their millions of millions of years of evolution of humanity as species who would be completely alien to today's humanity.

I am sad to see people fall for this Atheistic deityless delusion and it hurts me to say this, but it is a form of cognitive dissonance with only one cure, Jesus Christ.

Throughout these posts I have noticed Atheistic pundits of Evolution exhibit inconsistent thoughts, beliefs/attitudes, especially as relating to their dogmatic beliefs. They have a resistant attitude, refuse to change their fixation on their assertion of the absence of an intelligent designer.

I suppose no matter what is said or demonstrated, they religiously hold to what has been indoctrinated in them.

Indoctrination is what intelligence communities use and therefore I regard those who fall for the Evolution Theory delusion as victims.

There is only one cure.

 

[The Times]

.

 

[The Times]

This is Evolution 101 - Welcome to Evolution 101! I couldn't find the bit about fictional aliens.

Here is a perfect example of species cross contamination, where different kinds of species are mixed in a soup.

The above pic is from the link below.....

The history of life: looking at the patterns

What the article doesn't show is the millions of millions of years of failed neomorphs to xenomorphs, which eventually result in the actual species shown above.

Where is the evidence of transmutations of one species to another and the multidude of intermediate failed lifeforms, before the ones so elaborately displayed for the purpose of indoctrination.

 

[Jimmy D]

failed neomorphs to xenomorphs

What is a neomorph? (and a xenomorph)

 

[Jimmy D]

Where is the evidence of transmutations of one species to another and the multidude of intermediate failed lifeforms, before the ones so elaborately displayed for the purpose of indoctrination.

What do you mean intermediate failed life forms? Could you describe one? I really don't know what you mean.

 

[The Times]

There would be cases according to Evolution Theory where Neomorphs would come into being, when crossing over from sea based to amphibian, to then land based. These cross species would have skeleton forming outside of the flesh, before migrating into the flesh. The gore before perfection would be a complete alien species.

Evolutionists don't want to talk about that do they.

 

[The Times]

What do you mean intermediate failed life forms? Could you describe one? I really don't know what you mean.

When you go from one species to another, like from sea based to amphibian, to then land based, you would get countless mutations for the changing of sea based verebrea to bony skeleton of land based. These variation are transmutations and you will see gore before perfection.

 

[Jimmy D]

There would be cases according to Evolution Theory where Neomorphs would come into being, when crossing over from sea based to amphibian, to then land based. These cross species would have skeleton forming outside of the flesh, before migrating into the flesh. The gore before perfection would be a complete alien species.

Evolutionists don't want to talk about that do they.

This is only an artists impression, I'm not claiming it's evidence of anything but hypothetically it's possible that a transistion from fish to land based creatures could look like this.... which one would be the "Neomorph"?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

What is a neomorph? (and a xenomorph)

Well, neo is Greek for 'young', sometimes taken to mean 'new', so neomorph is 'new or young forms'.
And xeno comes from the Greek xenos for 'alien' or 'stranger', so xenomorph is a big black bug thing from LV-426.

 

[The Times]

God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. (Genesis 1:31)

Is this Biblical claim correct?

Absolutely!

Because each species existed simultaneously without any transmutations of species from Neomorphs to Xenomorphs.

The entire species on earth are never crossed and therefore existed simultaneously after their own kind. Each kind has an adaptable variation built in, which would allow a wolf species to dog transition and so forth.

There is no evidence of cross contamination of sea based and land based species.

Maybe if I considered a tadpole to an amphibian frog, then the basis here is adaptation of the same species, not evolution, because we are seeing it within a life cycle. Anything that can be seen within a life cycle cannot be evolution, rather it is adaption for what the intelligent designer purposed the tadpole to be, just like a butterfly.

The only evidence for Evolution of species from sea based to land based is if neomorphs to xenomorphs can be qualatively and quantitatively observed and measured as fossils being separated by substantial time to suggest evolution. This is never seen and those who claim evolution of organisms in a beaker are down right hilarious.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. (Genesis 1:31)

Is this Biblical claim correct?

Absolutely!

Because each species existed simultaneously without any transmutations of species from Neomorphs to Xenomorphs.

The entire species on earth are never crossed and therefore existed simultaneously after their own kind. Each kind has an adaptable variation built in, which would allow a wolf species to dog transition and so forth.

There is no evidence of cross contamination of sea based and land based species.

Maybe if I considered a tadpole to an amphibian frog, then the basis here is adaptation of the same species, not evolution, because we are seeing it within a life cycle. Anything that can be seen within a life cycle cannot be evolution, rather it is adaption for what the intelligent designer purposed the tadpole to be, just like a butterfly.

The only evidence for Evolution of species from sea based to land based is if neomorphs to xenomorphs can be qualatively and quantitatively observed and measured as fossils being separated by substantial time to suggest evolution. This is never seen and those who claim evolution of organisms in a beaker are down right hilarious.

What is a neomorph and a xenomorph?

 

[The Times]

This is only an artists impression, I'm not claiming it's evidence of anything but hypothetically it's possible that a transistion from fish to land based creatures could look like this.... which one would be the "Neomorph"?

I believe that the impression would be more like a skeleton forming outside of the flesh and slowly over time and after many death cycles, migrating inside of the flesh.

The fossils that are too numerous would easily be found across all species, but there is no such transitioning.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I believe that the impression would be more like a skeleton forming outside of the flesh and slowly over time and after many death cycles, migrating inside of the flesh.

The fossils that are too numerous would easily be found across all species, but there is no such transitioning.

... what? You think that the theory of evolution claims that skeletons came first outside of flesh and muscle, ignoring all laws of biological mechanics, then went inside the body?

 

[The Times]

What is a neomorph? (and a xenomorph)

A Neomorph is a failed attempt at the transitioning from one species to another. For example a sea based to a land based. The Xenomorph is the life permitting transition, though short lived, as the transitioning continues over time, until a more efficient model is established.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

A Neomorph is a failed attempt ar the transitioning from one species to another. For example a sea based to a land based. The Xenomorph is the life permitting transition, though short lived, as the transitioning continues until a more efficient model is established.

So you're just coming up with your own nonsense terms. Got it.

 

[The Times]

What do you mean intermediate failed life forms? Could you describe one? I really don't know what you mean.

From sea to land based there would be numerous transitioned mutations. Obviously the whale doesn't become a monkey overnight, does it?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

From sea to land based there would be numerous transitioned mutations. Obviously the whale doesn't become a monkey overnight, does it?

That's not how evolution works.
Where are you getting these ideas about evolution from?

 

[The Times]

... what? You think that the theory of evolution claims that skeletons came first outside of flesh and muscle, ignoring all laws of biological mechanics, then went inside the body?

That is exactly what would happen, because the transition is not a prety picture. When one species morphs with another, you get a confused state, where the land based wants to prematurely grow bones, before the bones are covered by flesh.

 

[Jimmy D]

LOL.

I believe that the impression would be more like a skeleton forming outside of the flesh and slowly over time and after many death cycles, migrating inside of the flesh.

The fossils that are too numerous would easily be found across all species, but there is no such transitioning.

Why couldn't it happen in a similar way to the picture I posted? You've got a vivid imagination.

Or more likely a POE.