G
GratiaCorpusChristi
Guest
Since this list seems to be errors that don't include all Protestants but are errors found among some Protestants, and some which are major points of division between Protestants, I'd really like to take issue with one or two that can be found among Catholics and Orthodox as well, and are therefore not really uniquely Protestant errors:
6. Prima Scriptura. Scripture is the final arbitor, but if scripture is the final arbitor as interpreted by a council then we're really just talking about Lutheran, Anglican, and Orthodox models of authority. And pre-Tridentine Catholics as well. Francis Oakley, The Western Church in the Later Middle Ages. Steven Ozment, The Age of Reform, 1250-1550: An Intellectual and Religious History of Late Medieval and Reformation Europe.
19. Lapsarianism. Although Catholicism has never held that God is the sole cause for damnation, double causation has a very long history in the philosophical work of the great scholastics. While God certainly did not preordain people directly to hell solely of his own volition, the idea that God has nothing to do with people's damnation or indeed has nothing to do with any given human actual is a post-Enlightenment understanding of single causation. William Placher, The Domestication of Transcendence.
20. Penal substitution. Neither Catholics nor Orthodox believe in double imputation, but the single imputation of our sin onto Christ, apart from his imputation of righteousness upon us, is the basis for the theology of the sacrament of penance. Of course Catholic theology insists that works infused with grace restore our actual righteousness, but the expiation of sin (getting us to "neutral") is grounded in the cross. If necessarily, just change #20 to double imputation.
37. Denominationalism. Very improperly defined. What's the problem? In what way does this qualify as solely a Protestant error?
49. Accountability partners. What? Seriously? Trust me, I know plenty of Catholics who look to one another for moral accountability. Heck, it's advised in some of the best Catholic moral literature!
51. Church discipline nullified because of a multi-denominational environment. Well come on, now, that's hardly a Protestant error. If anything, it's simply due to the fact that nations provided substantial religious liberty and had adequate space for offenders to run. That's how Rhode Island and Connecticut were founded, you know.
55. A specific pope will be the antichrist. This is absolutely not unique to Protestants. There is a very long tradition going back at least a thousand years predicting the rise of a papal antichrist who will corrupt the church. The accusation, of course, assumes the importance of the papacy- whether as God's appointed leader of the church or as a historically contingent office that has come to assume leadership- because the antichrist has long been regarded as a figure who arrives to corrupt the church from within. And where better than in the chair of St. Peter? You can find Catholics making this claiming throughout the Middle Ages, least of whom is Dante Alighieri. Bernard McGinn, Antichrist: Two Thousand Years of the Human Fascination With Evil.
I'm not debate whether on not any of these points are right or wrong. The important thing is that these are not uniquely Protestant errors. They may very well be errors, or they may not, or they may only be errors in a Protestant context, or only in a Catholic one. But they are not uniquely Protestant.
Honorable mention (uniquely Protestant, but simply wrong):
63.2. Selling of indulgences. The Catholic Church has never taught that indulgences are to be sold, and that is correct. But that gives the mistaken impression that the selling of indulgences was not authorized by high church authorities, including Cardinal Albrecht of Mainz and Pope Leo X. Dogmatically, they were not sold, but their sale was not confined to a few minor "unscrupulous people."
Upvote
0
