Prior infection and vaccine mandates

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,327.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A Systematic Review of the Protective Effect of Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Repeat Infection

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

We systematically reviewed studies to estimate the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection among those previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Of those, 10 studies were eligible for our systematic review. The weighted average risk reduction against reinfection was 90.4% with a standard deviation of 7.7% (p-value: <0.01). Protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection was observed for up to 10 months.

The protective effect of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on re-infection is high and similar to the protective effect of vaccination. More research is needed to characterize the duration of protection and the impact of different SARS-CoV-2 variants.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LeafByNiggle

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
928
631
75
Minneapolis
✟174,868.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
It does show no infections for that group, which means pretty good protection over 5 months for that many people.
I agree that it is "pretty good".

....it may be best not to use limited doses on those with prior infection when they already have substantial protection. This is especially true in the context of poorer nations not having doses.

That is also true. We should invest more heavily in exporting vaccines and get Pfizer and Moderna to refrain from enforcing their patents and provide the production info necessary.
 
Upvote 0