You don’t start with adaption. Adaption is what happens when a mutation (or genetic drift, or random assortment etc) is fixed in a population.When adaptations on their own cannot? There is a prohibition against perfect adaptations?
If you are just starting out with an adaptation, how can you get it wrong?
Sure it does, you're saying obscuring the truth makes it truer.
Jesus said "if you are unfaithful in what is least, you will be unfaithful in what is much"
You are putting mutation first, which is unfaithful and concluding you don't need to change the interpretation of what you believe according to the circumstances or expectations of others who might also want to believe it.
God never said "Let there be mutation" your head is in the clouds?
You can't. You have no conscious control of your own genetics.
It isn't physically possible to have a new evolutionary adaption without a mutation.
You still don't appear to understand how adaptions work.
Specifically describe a single example of a new adaptation that did not originate in a mutation but is still relevant to the evolutionary process.
Because your descriptions do not make any sense using accepted definitions.
If Evolution is true, the message of Evolution should change over time, too?
Studies in plants have shown that DNA changes position (within the plant) in conjunction with the seasons (Australian Science Magazine, exact reference beyond recollection)
You are assuming you know how adaptations work, out of an appeal to necessity.
I'm not saying mutation doesn't ever invoke a review of damaged DNA, I'm saying the focus of the DNA is never second place to mutation - the review of damaged DNA aims to restore the DNA to its best possible or better state. No one takes perfectly good DNA and hopes they'll get better, should more and more of it mutate - they simply settle for something close to restored, if it proves strong. Anything less than that and you have cancer or death.
That's what your DNA is screaming at you "mutate less, not more!"
The first creatures on earth, did not mutate at random - their adaptations were a gift from God (as God added strength to them, in the form that He wished to give them) - they may have mutated at times, but on the whole they did not desire to stray from God, and so we have what we see today!
If Evolution is true, the message of Evolution should change over time, too?
What if the space that existed in DNA, for adaptations to fit into, was limited?
Then you would be forced to evolve, the most adaptive set of all possible sets?
No. The mutation is only relevant to it's context.I think what is missing is that you are suggesting that the mutation is greater than its context: the context of a mutation is in principle just as important as the mutation itself.