No, that's experience speaking, not declaration of the parties. Look at the thousands of victims.
Sure, any individual could possibly be celibate, but when making an issue of being a couple to the Catholic Agency, that is quite unlikely. That's not the point anyway.
Same logic prevails when the RCC declines to take a priest that declares homosexuality. That is still the official position, despite the flagrant rebellion today. You don't take vows and then say, "Screw you. I'm doing what I want!"
Here's one example of what it is dealing with today:
"In his new book and in several interviews Father Pierre Valkering has talked openly and in detail about his homosexuality.
The Dutch priest, who works in a parish in Amsterdam, spoke about his sexual relationships and also said he visits gay saunas and dark rooms, and likes to watch porn.
In a statement to
De Gaykrant, a Dutch newspaper for the gay community,
Bishop Jos Punt said that while he appreciates Valkering’s honesty and understands his struggle, he nevertheless asked him to lay down his priestly duties because the priest refuses to abide by his vow of celibacy.
“
This is incompatible with a worthy exercise of the priesthood.”
This is the sort of flagrant opposition that the RCC is dealing with today, and at least it has, in form anyway, upheld scripture so far on this issue.
Dutch bishop suspends gay priest after he refuses to live celibate lifestyle