I never said anything about their sexual activities interfering with being good parents. That was never my position.
I meant to say 'of coarse not'. I believe that they can be loving, kind, good disciplinarians, etc. But I don't believe it's in the best interest of the child. I have already stated some of the reasons why, you can go back and read those post.
They will ask about their relationship with each other. Are you a couple or are you friends/room mates? They will ask about the relationships of everyone living in the home.
It shows how important it is for children to have a close relationship to both a female and male as they are growing up.
No, that's experience speaking, not declaration of the parties. Look at the thousands of victims.
That's false. A child is best off with a mom and a dad who love each other and the child. Full stop. The rest is just recent noise.
He explained that several times. Children need their MOM AND DAD. It's irresponsible to intentionally deprive your child of this. Sure, people sometimes die, and some leave, due to their own issues. But none of that should happen to a child and a child deserves his own mom and dad loving each other and him. This is what is best for children.
Except there's to many kids in foster care . And not enough moms and dads. Turning decent people away over being gay. Just means a good amount of kids dont get adopted. And get lost in the system. They basically turn into adults. And become what Conservative Christians and Republicans complain about. So loving parent or parents are better than foster care.
But nothing about their sex lives, despite what was asserted earlier? Seems like I'm not getting a straight story here.
You said this: Just as much as the Catholic ban on gay clergy says that priests have heterosexual sexual proclivities. Doesn't mean that either can't be celibate - meaning your claim that the group's problem was with behavior rather than orientation is incorrect.
Absolutely false. It is directly and specifically because the religious tenets define family, and the agency has always abided by this. Until now.
I haven't seen any proof. That kids are better off with a female and male only parents. I think the perfect thing for children , is for bio parents to be raising their child. Even same sex couples. That used a donor. Unless the bio parents cant or don't want to parent their child.
Same sex couples are not and cannot ever be "bio parents" (plural). We aren't created to reproduce this way, for good reason.
Actully, one can. If hey use donor sperm. Or donor egg. My niece just had a boy. Her eggs with a sperm donor. The sperm donor even got to see the baby. Her wife has a few girls. With the wifes eggs and a sperm donor. So they are raising their kids. But used some elses sperm. So far , very happy kids ,and teens.
So, only one bio parent, just as I said.
