Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Mail Online
American Thinker: Climategate's Phil Jones Confesses to Climate Fraud
To some extent I don't think this changes much, but while I to ascent to the idea that the main issue of global warming hasn't been addressed:
1 CO2 is a greenhouse gas
2 Accumulation of CO2 will cause the earth to warm
3 We are accumulating CO2
4 Therefore the earth will warm
Would it be fair to say that the scepticism and even high suspscion was both probably well founded, and justified?
I know this forum seems to lean predominantly toward the veiw of the scientific "authorities" (for lack of a better term). So what are the opinions here?
American Thinker: Climategate's Phil Jones Confesses to Climate Fraud
To some extent I don't think this changes much, but while I to ascent to the idea that the main issue of global warming hasn't been addressed:
1 CO2 is a greenhouse gas
2 Accumulation of CO2 will cause the earth to warm
3 We are accumulating CO2
4 Therefore the earth will warm
Would it be fair to say that the scepticism and even high suspscion was both probably well founded, and justified?
I know this forum seems to lean predominantly toward the veiw of the scientific "authorities" (for lack of a better term). So what are the opinions here?