• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

"People have lost the ability to judge what is true and what is not," - Tyson

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟177,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
What do we need the magical expansion of nothing for except to explain Fairie Dust?

Quit ignoring those charged particles and you won't need DE or DM for that matter.

A New Non-Doppler Redshift

Nor will you need to keep trying to uselessly modify Newtons laws since they don't apply to 99.9% of the universe anyways.

Of course when you got people that want to treat a universe 99.9% plasma with the wrong physics, you need all that Fairie Dust to make the equations work. But even if not one single scientist in one single laboratory anywhere uses anything but particle physics and electromagnetic theory to describe plasma behavior in that lab, people think it's not needed once you leave the laboratory and barely apply it to a universe 99.9% plasma.

And you people actually wonder why they need that 96% Fairie Dust....because they used the wrong physics to begin with......start using the correct physics for the correct states of matter and we can get back to laboratory experimentation again instead of fantasies of the mind.

Had they let redshift die when technology advanced and falsified it instead of changing it to magical expanding nothing, cosmology would be a lot further along and rid of half of its epicycles by now.
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,725
USA
Visit site
✟150,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

I was recently wondering about the same thing. Especially with the numerous islands being inundated and the north polar region's Polar Bears being in severe survival distress due to diminishing ice floes.

The Pacific islands losing a way of life to climate change – in pictures

Global Warming and Polar Bears - National Wildlife Federation
 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟177,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others

Which is offset by the Antarctic sea ice reaching new levels.

Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches New Record Maximum

Things change naturally. What was once mountains were sea beds at one time. What are now sea beds were once mountains. The Sahara Dessert was once a vibrant flourishing tropic. Don't blame natural changes on man, he has nothing to do with any of it except to watch the natural cycle as a passenger.

It goes up and down, always has, always will.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,725
USA
Visit site
✟150,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single


Please note that the article you provided is describing a local increase in sea ice but is not denying that the overall effect of global warming is a net decrease in sea ice. It compares this with the way in which general global temperature is increasing while regionally some areas might hit record lows.


 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟177,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others

Well lets just look at the temperatures over the last 10,000 years and put this in perspective



Well, were is your global warming when put in perspective? The Medieval Warm Period was warmer than it was today, and I know your not going to blame man made Co2 for that, are you?

Or maybe youd like to break it down over the last 2,000 years and get a little perspective.




Or perhaps we should zoom out further and get even more perspective.

 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,725
USA
Visit site
✟150,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

Well, I guess that clinches it. We are free to dump as much greenhouse gasses as we want into the atmosphere without having to worry about the consequences!
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian

Thanks for that link.

I think that this information only goes to demonstrate that global warming is a complex topic, there may be many influences that we just aren't aware of yet, and the environmentalists are focused on too narrow of an issue. They should be focused on *air pollution* in general, which we know kills millions of humans every single year.
 
Reactions: ananda
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟349,292.00
Faith
Atheist
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
The PSI page I linked to provided many direct quotes from the papers themselves. How was this misrepresentative?

How is this Skolnick individual (whose site you linked to) more credible?
 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟177,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Well, I guess that clinches it. We are free to dump as much greenhouse gasses as we want into the atmosphere without having to worry about the consequences!

No one said pollution is a good thing. It's their trying to pawn off the false belief that Co2 is the cause of global warming.

Push to fight pollution and I'll back you all the way. But never will I support any made up false belief that is NOT supported by the data.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟349,292.00
Faith
Atheist
The PSI page I linked to provided many direct quotes from the papers themselves. How was this misrepresentative?
I'm just reporting an article that says the authors claim they were misrepresented. You'll have to ask them, or check the original contexts.

How is this Skolnick individual (whose site you linked to) more credible?
I'm not saying he's more credible, but you can easily check what he says. He's just one of many pointing out that the site and its owners don't seem to be everything they claim.

My point is just to provide another perspective on that site - I was intrigued by its claims and did some browsing about it. What I found raised a few red flags. YMMV, DYR.
 
Upvote 0